Case law

City of Richmond v. Creel

253 Mo. 256 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913

Louis v. … [State v. Campbell, 214 Mo. 363 , and cases cited: Bank v.

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McCooey

273 Mo. 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1917

BROWN, C. … Louis as the board of directors shall determine.

Evans v. Wilder

7 Mo. 359 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1842

Simonds v. Catlin, 2 I. R. … Simonds v. Catlin, ib.

Thomas v. Black

113 Mo. 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1892

Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 311 ; Pounds v. Dale, 48 Mo. 270 ; Wetherall v. Harris, 51 Mo. 65 . … Sutton v. Casseleggi, 77 Mo. 397 ; Jones v. Manly, 58 Mo. 559 ; Brown v. Moore, 74 Mo. 633 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 280 . III.

First National Bank v. North Missouri Coal & Mining Co.

86 Mo. 125 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

Burk v. Flournoy et al., 4 Mo. 117 ; State ex rel. v. Sanderson, 54 Mo. 203, 206 ; Alexander v. Horner, 1 McCrary, 634 ; *138 Bliss on Code Plead., secs. 72, 96, 97; Story’s Eq. Plead. (9 Ed.) secs. 136, 138. … Bk., 80 Mo. 165 ; Ringling v. Kohn, 6 Mo App. 333.

State ex rel. Rolston v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

246 Mo. 512 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1912

S. 150 ; Billings v. Illinois, 188 U. S. 97 ; State v. Loomis, 115 Mo. l. c. 314; Powell v. Sherwood, 162 Mo. 605 ; State v. Gregory, 170 Mo. l. c. 604, 605 ; State v. Cantwell, 179 Mo. l. c. 265; State v. … Tower, 185 Mo. l. c. 94; State v. Swagerty, 203 Mo. l. c. 523; State ex inf. v.

Doemker v. City of Richmond Heights

322 Mo. 1024 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1929

[Webb v. Strobach, 143 Mo. App. 459 ; Hinerman v. Williams, 205 Mo. App. 364 .] … Pflueger v.

Charles Green Real Estate Co. v. St. Louis Mutual House Building Co. No. 3

196 Mo. 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1906

In Goode v. … [Keith v. Browning, 139 Mo. 190 ; Hardwicke v. Hamilton, 121 Mo. 465 ; Phillips v. Stewart, 59 Mo. *373 491 ; Maloney v. Webb, 112 Mo. 575 ; Harlin v. Nation, 126 Mo. 97 ; Markwell v. Markwell, 157 Mo. 326 .]

State ex rel. Hahn v. Westport

135 Mo. 120 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1896

Brewington v. Lowe, 1 Ind. 21 , and cases there cited; Smith v. Railroad, 29 Ind. 546 ; California v. Railroad, 149 U. S. 308 ; 91 Cal. 545 . … In Lord v.

State v. Richardson

340 Mo. 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937

Davis told me that he was on the running board talking to him, standing on the running board, talking to them when Mr. … [State v. Shawley, 334 Mo. 352 , 67 S. W. (2d) 74 , l. c. 86 (23, 25); State v. Majors, 329 Mo. 148 , 44 S. W. (2d) 163 , l. c. 166 (5); State v. Buckner, 80 S.

State ex rel. Hadley v. People's United States Bank

197 Mo. 574 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1906

In Hill v. … For example: Towle v. Building & Loan Ass’n, 60 Fed. 131 ; Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co., 93 Mich. 97 ; Stevens v. Davison, 18 Gratt. 819 ; Blatchford v. Ross, 54 Barb. 42 ; Wayne Pike Co. v.

Bass v. Nooney Co.

646 S.W.2d 765 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1983

Stewart v. Brown, 546 S.W.2d 204 (Mo.App.1977); Household Finance Company, Inc. v. Watson, 522 S.W.2d 111 (Mo.App.1975); Bolhofner v. Jones, 482 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App.1972); Franklin v. Farmers Mut. Ins. … At another point in her testimony, plaintiff estimated that she boarded the elevator “at about quarter of eleven.” .

Wilhite v. Wilhite

284 Mo. 387 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1920

[Williamson v. Brown, 195 Mo. l.c. 331; Corrigan v. Tiernay, 100 Mo. l.c. 280-281; McKim v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 196 Mo. App. l.c. 547-8.] … [Viers v. Viers, 175 Mo. l.c. 453; Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. l.c. 92.]

Holland Realty & Power Co. v. City of St. Louis

282 Mo. 180 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1920

Louis, are officials of the city and constitute- its Board of Public Improvements. … The court held it was improbable the space eighty feet above the surface would be thus needed; that the statute should not be interpreted to vest the board with control at that height. [Wandsworth Board of Works v.

State Ex Rel. Jacoby v. Missouri Valley Drainage District

353 Mo. 1005 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1945

She brings this action against the district and against the members of its board of supervisors to compel the latter to levy a tax for the purpose of paying the judgment. … Emerson v. City of Mound City, 335 Mo. 702 , 73 S. W. (2d) 1017 , supra; and Coleman v. Kansas City, 351 Mo. 254 , 173 S. W. (2d) 572 . Also see our recent decision in State ex rel. County of St. Louis v. St.

Ready v. Smith

170 Mo. 163 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 18, 1902

Obviously the wrong, if any, primarily was to the university company, and the board of directors of the company were the parties entitled to represent said corporation. [Loomis v. Railroad, 165 Mo. 469 .] … ), and if there was no board, he was not a member of it.

Logsdon v. Duncan

316 S.W.2d 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1958

Upon the former trial there was doubt that there was a board more than four, five or six feet in length on the scaffold and that he could have reached the distance of nine feet with such a board. … This time he definitely says that the board he used was six or seven feet long.

Clay & Bailey Manufacturing Co. v. Anderson

344 S.W.2d 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1961

Respondents admit in their brief that the Electrical and Mechanical Appeal Board “may be classed as an administrative body” within the meaning of Constitution of Missouri, Article V, Section 22. … In Rollins v.

State v. Barker

294 Mo. 303 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1922

[State v. Stenzel, 220 S.W. l.c. (Mo.) 884; Christine v. Luyties, 280 Mo. l.c. 431, 217 S.W. l.c. 60; Hayes v. McLaughlin, 217 S.W. l.c. 264; Frick v. Insurance Co., 279 Mo. l.c. 157-8, 213 S.W. l.c. 855; Vahldick v. … *Page 317 In State v.

State ex rel. Wyatt v. Hoyt

123 Mo. 348 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1894

Defendant never had a hearing before the county board of equalization, nor was the matter of his assessment ever brought before said board. … Charles, 47 Mo. 462 , and cases cited; Railroad v. Maguire, 49 Mo. 483 .