Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • Bell v. Campbell

    123 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1894

    Jur. [13 Ed.], sec. 300; Pinckston v. Brown, 3 Jones’ Eq. (N. C.) 494; Kitchen v. Greenabaum, 61 Mo. loc. cit. 115. Second. … Brown v. Bowen, 90 Mo. loc. cit. 190; McClanahan v. West, 100 Mo. loc. cit. 322, and cases cited.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • St. Louis County v. State Tax Commission

    562 S.W.2d 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1978

    The third is General Motors Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 125 N.J.L. 574 , *337 16 A.2d 632 (Ct.Err. & App.1940). … State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150, 158 (Mo.App.1974).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Missouri State Tax Commission

    426 S.W.2d 362 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1966

    Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board, 347 U.S. 590, 603 , 74 S.Ct. 757, 765 , 98 L.Ed. 967 : “Property in transit may move so regularly and so continuously that part of it is always in the State. … Ry. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 , where an assessment of $23,996,604.14 was held not excessive in comparison to the railroad’s figure of $16,021,296.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Gracy

    126 Mo. 472 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 5, 1895

    Board v. Dart (1881), 67 Ga. 765 ; Rogers v. Railroad (1883), 70 Ga. 717 . … This delay in the county tax proceedings was, no doubt, caused by delay in the action of the state board.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Anderson

    79 S.W.3d 420 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 2002

    He further argues that the Cape Girardeau County board of jury commissioners (hereinafter, “Board”) failed to substantially comply with relevant requirements of sections 494.400-.505 RSMo 2000, in that they allegedly (a) … Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 293 (Mo. banc 1995), and a defective additional aggravating circumstance therefore usually affords a defendant no basis for relief. State v. Black, 50 S.W.3d 778, 791 (Mo. banc 2001).

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Cas. Reciprocal v. Mo. Emp. Mut. Ins.

    956 S.W.2d 249 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1997

    Trimble v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Parker

    38 Mo. 160 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1866

    on for the appellants, in respect to the action of the court below in continuing the motion for a new trial to the next term, presents essentially the same question which was before us in the case of Riddlesbarger et al. v. … McCoon, 3 Comst. 378; Hyde v. Cookson, 21 Barb. 92 ; Martin v. Potter, 5 Mees. & W. 352; Wild v. Holt, 9 Mees. & W. 672; Baker v. Wheeler, 8 Wend. 505 ; Brown v. Sax, 7 Cow. 95 ; Rightmyer v. Raymond, 12 Wend. 51 .

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • State v. Whittington

    379 S.W.2d 518 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1964

    State v. Parks, Mo., 331 S.W.2d 547 ; State v. Hands, Mo., 260 S.W.2d 14 ; State v. Carson, Mo., 286 S.W.2d 750 ; State v. Churchill, Mo., 299 S.W.2d 475 . … See State v. Davis, Mo., 371 S.W.2d 270 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harrison & Mercer County Drainage District v. Trail Creek Township

    317 Mo. 933 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1927

    In Drainage District v. … And again, in Drainage District v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Major v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    240 Mo. 35 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1912

    BROWN, J. … [Sidway v. Live Stock Company, 163 Mo. 342 ; Shohoney v. Railroad, 223 Mo. 649 ; *50 Lackawanna Coal and Iron Co. v. Long. 231 Mo. 605 ; Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Nemnich, 169 Mo. 388 .] In. Shohoney v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Robinson

    484 S.W.2d 186 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1972

    State v. Andrews, Mo.Sup., 371 S.W.2d 324, 327 [6] (no women); State v. Selman, Mo.Sup., 433 S.W.2d 572, 577 ; State v. Ramsey, 355 Mo. 720 , 197 S.W.2d 949 (absence of negroes). … Sanders, Mo.Sup., 365 S.W.2d 480 [3], and as truly reflecting the conditions at the scene, within the doctrine of State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 312 S.W.2d 818 [3]. See State v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Bradshaw v. Yates

    67 Mo. 221 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

    (Ranken et al. v. Patton et al., 65 Mo. 378 .) … In Kelly v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Steers

    44 Mo. 223 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1869

    , the duties of the board being ministerial, and not judicial. … (Mayo v. Freeland, 10 Mo. 629 ; State v. Harrison, 38 Mo. 540 ; State v. Rodman, 43 Mo. 256 ; Ex parte Heath, 3 Hill. 42 ; Brower v. O’Brien, 2 Ind. 423 ; People v. Hilliard, 29 Ill. 413 ; People v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Birmingham Drainage District v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

    274 Mo. 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1918

    BROWN, C. … [Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; Columbia Bottom Levee Co. v. Meier, 39 Mo. 53 ; Morrison v. Morey, 146 Mo. 543 ; State ex rel. v. Drainage District, 192 Mo. 517 ; Mound City Land & Stock Co. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Fulwider v. Trenton Gas, Light & Power Co.

    216 Mo. 582 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1909

    The general rule is well put by our Brother Graves in Swinhart v. … They rely on the doctrine of eases like Baxter v. Railroad, 198 Mo. 1 , and cases cited, and Gross v. Watts, 206 Mo. 373 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • O'Neill v. Kansas City

    178 Mo. 91 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1903

    The boards of which the walk was constructed had become loose and the stringers on which the boards were laid were rotten. The cross-walk had been in this condition two or three months. … [Rogers on Expert Testimony (2 Ed.), p. 67; Stearns v. Field, 90 N. Y. 640 .]

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Blackwell v. City of Lee's Summit

    326 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1930

    V. … But in Kitchen v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Friend

    711 S.W.2d 508 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

    Id.; State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694 (Mo. banc 1983). A statute is presumed constitutional and will not be declared unconstitutional unless it clearly and undoubtedly violates some constitutional provision. State v. … Brown, supra. The burden of establishing its unconstitutionality rests upon the party questioning it. State v. Hampton, 653 S.W.2d 191 (Mo. banc 1983).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Black

    113 Mo. 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1892

    Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 311 ; Pounds v. Dale, 48 Mo. 270 ; Wetherall v. Harris, 51 Mo. 65 . … Sutton v. Casseleggi, 77 Mo. 397 ; Jones v. Manly, 58 Mo. 559 ; Brown v. Moore, 74 Mo. 633 ; State v. Moore, 61 Mo. 280 . III.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. Riley

    203 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1907

    Co. v. Evans, 97 Mo. 55 ; McFarland v. Railroad, 94 Mo. … "boards of county commissioners, or city courts in civil eases, etc.”

    Cited 32 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.