Case law

State v. Robinson

484 S.W.2d 186 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1972

State v. Andrews, Mo.Sup., 371 S.W.2d 324, 327 [6] (no women); State v. Selman, Mo.Sup., 433 S.W.2d 572, 577 ; State v. Ramsey, 355 Mo. 720 , 197 S.W.2d 949 (absence of negroes). … Sanders, Mo.Sup., 365 S.W.2d 480 [3], and as truly reflecting the conditions at the scene, within the doctrine of State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 312 S.W.2d 818 [3]. See State v.

Ellerbe v. National Exchange Bank

109 Mo. 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

S. 1889, secs. 2100, 2303, 2304; Fitzgerald v. Barker, 96 Mo. 661 ; Orth v. Dorschlein, 32 Mo. 366 . II. … V.

Southern Hotel Co. v. Newman

30 Mo. 118 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860

question in this case arises upon the offer of the appellant, (who was a subscriber to the capital stock of the Southern Hotel Company,) to prove by one of the corpora-tors, Joseph Chambers — who was also a member of the first board … See also Edgerly v. Emerson, 3 Foster, 566 .) In Trustees of St. Mary’s Church v.

Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of Revenue

476 S.W.2d 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1972

State (Jersey City Printing Co., Prosecutor) v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N.J.L. 36 (as to one of the claimants) ; Press Printing Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 51 N.J.L. 75 , 16 A. 173 ; Assessors of Boston v. … City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co., 193 Ky. 107 , 235 S.W. 31 ; State (Jersey City Printing Co., Prosecutor) v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N.J.L. 36 ; Press Printing Co. v.

State ex rel. Robert H. Mammen, Relator v. The Honorable Thomas N. Chapman

464 S.W.3d 513 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 2015

The Missouri Board of Probation and Parole informed the circuit court that Mr. Mammen had successfully completed the program. The board advised the court that Mr. … Jones v. Carnahan, 965 S.W.2d 209, 213 (Mo. App. 1998). Additionally, mandamus is inappropriate if the relator has an alternative adequate remedy. State ex rel. J.C. Nichols Co. v.

Gieselmann v. Stegeman

443 S.W.2d 127 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1969

Katz Drug Co., 351 Mo. 731 , 173 S.W.2d 906 , ended its existence, and destroyed its every faculty, including the capacity to hold meetings of the stockholders or of the board of directors. Leibson v. … Johnson v.

Eichorn v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

130 Mo. 575 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1895

This is a misapprehension of Moore v. Railroad. … Railroad v. Ives, 144 U. S. 408 ; O’Mellia v. Railroad, 115 Mo. 205 .

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Steers

44 Mo. 223 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1869

, the duties of the board being ministerial, and not judicial. … (Mayo v. Freeland, 10 Mo. 629 ; State v. Harrison, 38 Mo. 540 ; State v. Rodman, 43 Mo. 256 ; Ex parte Heath, 3 Hill. 42 ; Brower v. O’Brien, 2 Ind. 423 ; People v. Hilliard, 29 Ill. 413 ; People v.

Spring v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority

873 S.W.2d 224 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 22, 1994

On May 2,1989, Charlotte Spring boarded a Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA) bus driven by Cornelius J. Gottstein. As Ms. … What the driver knew or could have known may be shown by what the driver actually saw, by the amount of time that elapsed after boarding, Stoddard, v. St.

O'Neill v. Kansas City

178 Mo. 91 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1903

The boards of which the walk was constructed had become loose and the stringers on which the boards were laid were rotten. The cross-walk had been in this condition two or three months. … [Rogers on Expert Testimony (2 Ed.), p. 67; Stearns v. Field, 90 N. Y. 640 .]

Hockenberry v. Cooper County State Bank

338 Mo. 31 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1935

[Patton v. Shelton, 328 Mo. 631 , 40 S.W.2d 706 ; Manahan v. Manahan (Mo.), 52 S.W.2d 825 ; Klaber v. Unity School of Christianity, 330 Mo. 854 , 51 S.W.2d 30 ; Loehr v. … [Gilliland v.

Edwards v. French

304 Mo. 194 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1924

In Law v. … [Law v. Ware, 238 Ill. 360 -69; Clark v. Allen, 125 Cal. 276 ; Cox v. Haun, 127 Ind. 325 ; Montross v. Eddy, 94 Mich. 100 ; Litts v. Morse, 145 Wis. 472 ; Jordan v. Anderson, 36 S.D. 508 ; Knaus v.

Burdett v. May

100 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Angell on Limit. [6 Ed.] sec. 477 and notes; Hunt v. Wall, 75 Pa. St. 413; Warn v. Brown, 102 Pa. St. 347; Bradley v. Burgess, 10 S. W. Rep. 5 ; Medlock v. Suter, 80 Ky. 101 ; Mantle v. Beal, 82 Ky. 122 ; Valle v. … Browning, 31 Ark. 364 ; Wood on Limitations, sec. 251, et seq. and cases. The heirs, then, of Mrs.

Bass v. Nooney Co.

646 S.W.2d 765 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1983

Stewart v. Brown, 546 S.W.2d 204 (Mo.App.1977); Household Finance Company, Inc. v. Watson, 522 S.W.2d 111 (Mo.App.1975); Bolhofner v. Jones, 482 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App.1972); Franklin v. Farmers Mut. Ins. … At another point in her testimony, plaintiff estimated that she boarded the elevator “at about quarter of eleven.” .

Fitzpatrick v. Garver

253 Mo. 189 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1913

BROWN, C. jec men . … The same question was before this court in’Alexander v. Campbell, 74 Mo. 142 .

West v. Martin

31 Mo. 375 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1861

(Sills v. Brown, 9 Carr & P. 601; 16 Conn, 428.)

Haggerty v. Ruth

259 Mo. 221 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1914

BROWN, J. Action to determine and quiet title to real estate, and for partition. … [State v. Griffin, 98 Mo. 672 ; State v. Handley, 144 Mo. 118 ; Simcoe Realty Co. v. Brewing Co., 247 Mo. 29 ; Blanchard v. Dorman, 236 Mo. 416 , l. c. 439, and cases cited in saic last-named decision.]

State ex rel. St. Louis Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Gehner

320 Mo. 1172 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1928

Cunningham v. Board of Assessors, 52 La. Ann. 223 , 26 So. 872 .] … Society v. Board of Review, 290 Ill. l. c. 115.] The Odd Fellows conducted an organization for charitable purposes and raised a fund-to aid in such purposes.

Rashall v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

249 Mo. 509 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1913

[Citing Cahill v. Railroad, 205 Mo. l. c. 408; Evans v. Railroad, 178 Mo. l. c. 517; Aerkfetz v. Humphreys, 145 U. S. l. c. 419.] … [Brown v. Brown, 237 Mo. l. c. 668; Burge v. Railroad, 244 Mo. l. c. 94 et seq.] *523 Its application in this case shows that no ground existed for a recovery. The judgment is therefore reversed. Woodson, P.

State ex rel. Daniels v. Kasten

368 S.W.2d 429 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1963

Barnett v. Sappington, Mo., 260 S.W.2d 669, 670-672 ; Cohen v. Ennis, Mo., 308 S.W.2d 669, 672 ; Community Fire Protection District of St. Louis County v. … Board of Education of Pattonville Consolidated School District R-3, Mo., 312 S.W.2d 75, 76-77 . The case cited by appellants, Hays v.