Case law

Cuivre River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

769 S.W.2d 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1989

TO ALL COUNTY ASSESSORS AND BOARDS OF EQUALIZATION ORDER 1.1 The State Tax Commission exercises general supervision over all assessing officers of this state, over county boards of equalization and appeal in the performance … Howard Electric Cooperative v. Riney, 490 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1973).

State ex rel. Gracy v. Bank of Neosho

120 Mo. 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1894

Smith v. Chenault, 48 Tex. 455 ; Goodgion v. Gilreath, 32 S. C. 388. … S. 1879, sec. 6719; Meyer v. Rosenblatt, 78 Mo. 495 ; Potosi v. Casey, 27 Mo. 372 , and other cases.

Collins v. A. Jaicks Co.

279 Mo. 404 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 7, 1919

In Shelby v. … In Carstens v.

Dyer v. Wm. M. Sutherland Building & Contracting Co.

321 Mo. 1015 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1929

[State v. Miller, 45 Mo. 495, 497, 498 .] … Olsen v.

Birmingham Drainage District v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

274 Mo. 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1918

BROWN, C. … [Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; Columbia Bottom Levee Co. v. Meier, 39 Mo. 53 ; Morrison v. Morey, 146 Mo. 543 ; State ex rel. v. Drainage District, 192 Mo. 517 ; Mound City Land & Stock Co. v.

State v. Briscoe

237 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1911

S. 1909, sec. 5258; State v. Rosenblatt, 185 Mo. l. c. 117; State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. l. c. 704; State v. Riley, 228 Mo. l. c. 433.] … Ferriss and Brown, J J., concur.

Saint Louis Univ. v. Masonic Temple Ass'n of St. Louis

220 S.W.3d 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 2007

Support for SLU’s arguments that it is not controlled by a religious sect is shown by the fact that it is controlled and operated by this independent, lay Board of Trustees. See, e.g., Americans United v. … United v.

MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, ETC. v. Dealers Transport Co.

343 S.W.2d 40 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1961

City of Louisville, Ky., 240 S.W.2d 560 ; Loeffler v. City of Louisville, 308 Ky. 629 , 215 S.W.2d 535 ; City of El Paso v. Tuck, Tex.Civ.App., 282 S.W.2d 764 ; Couch v. … The cases cited are City of Milwaukee v. Town of Oak Creek, 8 Wis.2d 102 , 98 N.W.2d 469 , and In re Incorporation of Village of Brown Deer, 267 Wis. 481 , 66 N.W.2d 333 .

State v. Shay

339 S.W.2d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1960

Compton, 317 Mo. 475 , 296 S.W. 137 ; Brown v. McDaniel, 140 Mo.App. 522 , 120 S.W. 642 . … In Brown v. McDaniel, 140 Mo.App. 522 , 120 S.W. 642 , that court specifically held that negligence of counsel was insufficient to justify exclusion.

State v. Scobee

255 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

[State v. Johnson, 81 Mo. 60 ; Barbee v. Hereford, 48 Mo. 323 .] … J., and Brown,. J., concur.

McCormack v. Sawyer

104 Mo. 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

In Brown v. … Kent v. Highleyman, 17 Mo. App. 9 ; Powell v. Railroad, 65 Mo. 658 .

Stocking v. Howard

73 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

In Pippet v. … Morris v. Scott, 21 Wend. 281 ; Stone v. Stevens, 12 Conn. 219 ; Shaul v. Brown, 28 Iowa 37 ; s. c., 4 Am. 151; Stancliff v. Palmeter, 18 Ind. 324 . Many respectable authorities sustain the doctrine announced by Mr.

State v. Conners

258 Mo. 330 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

S. 1909) shall cause to be made out, certified and returned to this court, a transcript, as in civil cases (State v. Pieski, 248 Mo. 715 ; State v. … Brown and Baris, JJ., concur.

Bair v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

647 S.W.2d 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1983

The situation in the present case is analogous to that in Brown v. Parker, 375 S.W.2d 594 (Mo.App.1964). … In Flanigan v.

First National Bank v. American National Bank

173 Mo. 153 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1903

[Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co. v. Riche, L. R. 7 H. L. 653; Attorney- *161 General v. Great Eastern Railway Company, 5 App. Cas. 473; Baroness Wenlock v. The River Dee Company, 10 App. Cas. 354; Trevor v. … [Thilmany v. Paper Bag Co., 108 Iowa 333 , and cases cited; Groos v. Brewster, 55 S. W. (Tex.) 590.] The rule is thus tersely stated in Bank v.

Bradshaw v. Yates

67 Mo. 221 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

(Ranken et al. v. Patton et al., 65 Mo. 378 .) … In Kelly v.

McDermott v. Village of Calverton Park

454 S.W.2d 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1970

The Board of Trustees thereafter denied the application. … The case of Valley View Village v. Proffett, 6th Cir., 221 F.2d 412 , and Connor v. Township of Chanhassen, 249 Minn. 205 , 81 N.W.2d 789 , support our view. The contrary view is indicated in Dowsey v.

Burnau v. Whitten

642 S.W.2d 346 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1982

Eagleton v. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d 449, 453 (Mo. banc 1964); Wellston Kennel Club v. Castlen, 331 Mo. 798, 804 , 55 S.W.2d 288, 289 (1932). … Id. at 453-54 ; Wellston Kennel Club, 331 Mo. at 804 , 55 S.W.2d at 289 ; Browning v. City of Poplar Bluff, 370 S.W.2d 179, 183 (Mo.App.1963).

In the Matter of Proceedings Against Elam

357 Mo. 922 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1948

A.; Cooley on Torts (Student’s Ed.), p. 379, sec. 210; Manning v. Ketcham, 58 Fed. (2d) 948 (2, 3); Sandrowski v. Sandrowski, 230 Mo. App. 1056 , 93 S. W. (2d) 81 . 2 Gray v. … L. 690, 692, 56 Atl. 644 ; People v. Dohring, 59 N. Y. 374 et seq.; Ross v. Buhler (La.) 2 Mart. (N. S.) 312; Maitland v.

State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. Riley

203 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1907

Co. v. Evans, 97 Mo. 55 ; McFarland v. Railroad, 94 Mo. … "boards of county commissioners, or city courts in civil eases, etc.”