Case law

Grossman v. Public Water Supply District No. One

339 Mo. 344 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 22, 1936

And the board of directors cannot contract away its power to exercise its discretion in the proper manner and at the proper time, 46 Corpus Juris, section 296, page 1034. On an analogous question see City of Moberly v. … Shields v. Loveland, 74 Colo. 27, 218 . Pac. 913, and Searle v.

Gibson v. Perry

29 Mo. 245 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1860

Among these cases is that of Brown v. Quilter, Ambler 619, which is the only one cited by counsel for the plaintiffs in error. … But that case, as well as that of Steele v. Wright, cited in Doe v. Standham, 1 T.

Hamilton v. Scull's Administrator

25 Mo. 165 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1857

There is no doubt of the correctness of the principle asserted in the case of Brown’s Adm’r v.

Reddick v. Newburn

76 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1882

Partenheimer v. Van Order, 20 Barb. 479 ; Van Steenburgh v. Tobias, 17 Wend. 562 ; Auchmuty v. Ham, 1 Denio 495 ; Chipman v. Palmer, 77 N. Y. 51 . … Vide also Rossell v. Cottom, 31 Pa. St. 525; Ward v. Brown, 64 Ill. 307 , and Cook v. Morea, 33 Ind. 497 .

State Ex Rel. Phillips v. Barton

300 Mo. 76 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1923

These rulings, the court held in Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 , were not in harmony with the purpose of the statute, and that the enforcement of the rule as thus announced would fender contests of elections nugatory. … These cases, therefore, are as they should have been, under the wholesome interpretation given to the statute in Gantt v. Brown, overruled.

Moore v. Moore

169 Mo. 432 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1902

[Briggs v. Greene, 10 R. I. 495; McGuire v. Brown, 41 Iowa 650 ; Gregley v. Jackson, 38 Ark. 487 ; Butler v. Elyton Land Co., 84 Ala. 384 .] … [Dickinson’s Appeal, 42 Conn. 491 ; Heath v. White, 5 Conn. 228 ; Brown v. Dye, 2 Root (Conn.) 280.] In Briggs v. Greene, supra, it is said by the Supreme Court of Ehode Island, speaking through Bratton, C.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Feuerstein

529 S.W.2d 371 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1975

V, Sec. 3, Mo.Const.1945, V.A.M.S. The facts are presented by the stipulations of the parties. In 1972, the total assessed valuation of real property in St. Charles County was increased from the year 1971 by 12.25%. … This precise issue, however, was decided to the contrary in Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Campbell, 502 S.W.2d 354 (Mo.1973).

Evans v. Blackiston

66 Mo. 437 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

In the case of Dilworth v. Rice, 48 Mo. 124 , a similar question to the one under consideration, was presented. In disposing of it, Judge Wagner approvingly quotes the case of Brown v. … It will be observed that in the case of Brown v.

State v. Havens

95 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1888

The indictment and the motion to quash, was properly overruled on the authority of the following cases: State v. Brown, 60 Mo, 141; State v. Moore, 65 Mo. 606 ; State v. Hays, 67 Mo. 692 . … State v. McDonald, 85 Mo. 539 ; State v. Burk, 89 Mo. 635 .

State v. Randolph

496 S.W.2d 257 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1973

State v. Peal, supra, l. c. 842. With respect to the second ground, respondent cites State v. Browning, Mo., 442 S.W.2d 55 , and asserts that “Appellant’s assault upon Mr. … Substantially the same argument was rejected in State v. Ameen, supra. In State v. Browning, supra, the court held the facts did not demonstrate homicide by accident in the course of a lawful act.

State v. Mitchell

237 Mo. 212 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1911

BROWN, J. … [State v. Smallwood, 68 Mo. 192 ; State v. Glasscock, 232 Mo. 278 .]

McDonnell v. De Soto Savings & Building Ass'n

175 Mo. 250 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1903

[Brown v. Archer, *270 62 Mo. App. 277 ; Moore v. Building & Loan Ass’n, 74 Mo. App. 468 ; Barnes v. Sav. & Bldg. Ass’n, 83 Mo. App. 466 ; Clark v. Mo. Guar. Ass’n, 85 Mo. App. 388 ; Fry v. Savings & Bldg. Ass’n, 88 Mo. … [Bray v. Marshall, 75 Mo. 327 ; Noble v. Blount, 77 Mo. 235 ; Avery v. Railroad, 113 Mo. 561 .] It was so held on an objection to testimony in Bray v. Marshall, supra. In Noble v.

State v. Briscoe

237 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1911

S. 1909, sec. 5258; State v. Rosenblatt, 185 Mo. l. c. 117; State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. l. c. 704; State v. Riley, 228 Mo. l. c. 433.] … Ferriss and Brown, J J., concur.

State v. Thompson

985 S.W.2d 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1999

State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 290 (Mo. banc 1995). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for sanctions. C. … Defendant cites State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797 (Mo. banc 1977), for the proposition that limiting voir dire as the trial judge did here is reversible error. Brownis, distinguishable from the present case.

State v. Scobee

255 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

[State v. Johnson, 81 Mo. 60 ; Barbee v. Hereford, 48 Mo. 323 .] … J., and Brown,. J., concur.

Cuivre River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

769 S.W.2d 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1989

TO ALL COUNTY ASSESSORS AND BOARDS OF EQUALIZATION ORDER 1.1 The State Tax Commission exercises general supervision over all assessing officers of this state, over county boards of equalization and appeal in the performance … Howard Electric Cooperative v. Riney, 490 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1973).

State ex rel. Gracy v. Bank of Neosho

120 Mo. 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1894

Smith v. Chenault, 48 Tex. 455 ; Goodgion v. Gilreath, 32 S. C. 388. … S. 1879, sec. 6719; Meyer v. Rosenblatt, 78 Mo. 495 ; Potosi v. Casey, 27 Mo. 372 , and other cases.

Collins v. A. Jaicks Co.

279 Mo. 404 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 7, 1919

In Shelby v. … In Carstens v.

State v. Shay

339 S.W.2d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1960

Compton, 317 Mo. 475 , 296 S.W. 137 ; Brown v. McDaniel, 140 Mo.App. 522 , 120 S.W. 642 . … In Brown v. McDaniel, 140 Mo.App. 522 , 120 S.W. 642 , that court specifically held that negligence of counsel was insufficient to justify exclusion.

Dyer v. Wm. M. Sutherland Building & Contracting Co.

321 Mo. 1015 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1929

[State v. Miller, 45 Mo. 495, 497, 498 .] … Olsen v.