Case law

Crothers v. LaForce

241 Mo. 365 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1912

[Whiting v. Lead Co., 195. Mo. 509; Vandeventer v. Goss, 190 Mo. 239 , and cases cited.] … Kennish and Brown, JJconcur.

State Ex Rel. McClure v. Dinwiddie

358 Mo. 15 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1948

See, Browne v. Creek, 357 Mo. 576 , 209 S. W. (2d) 900 ; Camden v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 206 S. W. (2d) 699 ; Vol. … Bates v. Miller, 133 Fed. (2d) 645, certiorari denied, 63 S. Ct. 1446 , 320 U. S. 210 , 87 L. Ed. 1848 ; Brown v. Cranston, 2 F. R. D. 270, 132 Fed. (2d) 631; General Taxicab Assn. v.

State v. Grant

372 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 11, 1963

Kiburz v. Loc-Wood Boat & Motors, Inc., Mo., 356 S.W.2d 882, 887 [6]. Defendant’s final “assignment” is that Instruction No. 4 was prejudicially erroneous. … State v. Aitkens, 352 Mo. 746 , 179 S.W.2d 84, 93 [19-22]; State v. Hinojosa, Mo., 242 S.W.2d 1, 10 [21].

Michael Holmes v. Sarah Steelman and Eric Schmitt

Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 2021

Louis board of police commissioners because the board was an agency of the state. Smith v. State, 152 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Mo. banc 2005). … Otherwise, “claims against employees of Police Boards would not be covered by the Fund.” Sherf v. Koster, 371 S.W.3d 903, 907 (Mo. App. 2012).

State v. Riley

270 S.W.2d 741 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1954

The three cases he relies on are: State v. Richards, 334 Mo. 485 , 67 S.W.2d 58 ; State v. Saale, 308 Mo. 573 , 274 S.W. 393 ; State v. Brown, 188 Mo. 451 , 87 S.W. 519 . … In the Brown case, the defendant’s prior, separate and distinct assault upon a third person was permitted to be shown, and on appeal to this court, this evidence was deemed reversible error.

Bennett v. O'Fallon

2 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1828

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Bennett against the defendant as executor of Stokes, to recover the value of goods sold to the wife of Stokes, and for her board and lodging. … Rep., 281, M’Cuthen v. M’Gahay, is a full answer to this argument, and lays down the law correctly.

Aaron v. Havens

758 S.W.2d 446 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 18, 1988

The trial judge relied on such cases as Brown v. National Supermarkets, 731 S.W.2d 291 (Mo.App.1987), and Warren v. Lombardo’s Enterprises, Inc., 706 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1986), in dismissing the petition. … Advance Rental Centers, Inc. v. Brown, 729 S.W.2d 644 (Mo.App.1987). Plaintiff’s counsel at oral argument suggested that the charges regarding the fire escape are more significant than those concerning the window.

State v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.

75 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

That notice is requisite under the provisions of said act we entertain no doubt, for it is expressly provided in section 4 of the act as follows : “ Said boards of directors, or boards of education, calling such election, … J. (1 Dutch.) 73; People v. Castro, 39 Cal. 65 ; Cardigan v. Page, 6 N. H. 189; Jordan v. School District, 38 Me. 164 ; Independent School District, 33 Pa. St. 297; People v.

Siemer v. Schuermann Building & Realty Co.

381 S.W.2d 821 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1964

Bogdanor, the Chairman of Metropolitan’s Board of Trustees. … Odom v. Langston, 356 Mo. 1140 , 205 S.W.2d 518, 520 (7); State ex rel. Gentry v. Curtis, 319 Mo. 316 , 4 S.W.2d 467, 475 (19).

State v. Hurst

347 S.W.2d 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1961

Appellant exhausted his remedy as to these points in the proceedings culminating in State v. Hurst, Mo.Sup., 280 S.W.2d 115 . That was a final judgment, State v. … Brown v. Stroeter, Mo.App., 263 S.W.2d 458 . No abuse of discretion in the 1954 proceeding has been shown. Appellant had an attorney. Evidence was presented.

Friedman v. Brandes

439 S.W.2d 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

The ancient case of Brown v. Union Ry. Co., 51 Mo.App. 192 , also involved a denial of new trial where the plaintiff was awarded $1.00 damages. … This is the proposition for which the Brown case stands.

Long v. Moon

107 Mo. 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Powell v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 80 ; Landis v. Hamilton, 77 Mo. 554 ; Jackson v. Hardin, 83 Mo. 175 ; Avery v. Fitzgerald, 94 Mo. 207 . II. Conceding that the injuries received by Mrs. … Ency. of Law, p. 830, and cases cited, note 3; Barry v. St. Louis, 17 Mo. 121 , and cases cited; Morgan v. Bowman, 22 Mo. 538 ; Clark's Adm'x v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 202 ; Hilsdorf v. St. Louis, 45 Mo. 94 ; Dillon v.

Haley v. Sippley

317 Mo. 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 1927

[Hamilton v. Boggess, 63 Mo. l. c. 251; St. Louis v. Railroad, 272 Mo. l. c. 85; Wiley v. Harlow, 274 Mo. l. c. 175.] … [Bray v. Marshall, 75 Mo. l. c. 330; Noble v. Blount, 77 Mo. l. c. 242; Avery v. Railroad Co., 113 Mo. l. c. 565; Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Northwestern Bank, 290 Mo. l. c. 332; Laughlin v. Wells, 283 S. W. 990 .]

Wiggin v. St. Louis

135 Mo. 558 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 11, 1896

Bassett v. St. Joseph, 53 Mo. 298 ; Kiley v. Kansas City, 69 Mo. 108 ; 87 Mo. 107 . … Ed gell v. Sigerson, 26 Mo. 583 ; Young v. Byrd, 124 Mo. 590 ; Nave v. Adams, 107 Mo. 414 .

Powell v. Huffman

358 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1948

Wilson v. Drumrite, 21 Mo. 325 ; Slowey v. McMurray, 27 Mo. 113 , 116; Book v. Beasley, supra; Bobb v. Wolff, supra. … Brown, 177 S.W. (2), l.c. 509-510) the instrument relied upon when considered with the allegations of the petition sufficiency charges that the transaction was in fact a mortgage. Sheppard v. Wagner, supra; Hargadine v.

State v. Wade

253 Mo. 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1913

No such showing has been made in the case, and under the authority of the statute above cited, as construed in the case of State v. Pieski, 248 Mo. 715 , we are constrained to hold tire motion to dismiss well taken. … -Brown, P. J., and WalJcer, J., concur.

State Ex Inf. McAllister Ex Rel. Cole v. Norborne Land Drainage District Co.

290 Mo. 91 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1921

Crow v. … Rose v.

In re Extension of Boundaries of Glaize Creek Sewer District of Jefferson County

574 S.W.2d 357 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1978

If approval is granted by the board the clerk of the board shall indorse his certificate of the fact of approval by the board upon the petition. … In Wright v. Town Board of Carlton, 70 Misc.2d 1 , 332 N.Y.S.2d 233 , aff’d as mod. on other ground, 41 A.D.2d 290 , 342 N.Y.

Plahto v. Merchants' & Manufacturers' Insurance

38 Mo. 248 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1866

It only develops and explains a latent ambiguity—Wise v. Mar. Ins. Co., 23 Mo. 80 ; 1 Arnold Ins. 25, n. 1; 2 Duer Ins. 40, 10; Rider v. Ocean Ins. Co., 20 Pick. 259 ; Jeff. Ins. Co. v. Cotheal, 7 Wend. 82 ; Davis v. … In Harmon v.

State v. Hathaway

106 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

of health, upon which he could be enrolled or which could be filed with the county clerk for record, or that he had failed to apply to the said state board for such certificate. … Proc., sec. 508 ; United States v. Cook, 17 Wall. 174 ; State v. Saunders, 63 Mo. 482 . The motion in arrest should have been sustained.