Case law

Division of Labor Standards, Department of Labor & Industrial Relations v. Friends of the Zoo of Springfield, Missouri, Inc.

38 S.W.3d 421 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2001

V, section 10. Reversed and remanded. I. The Springfield-Greene County Park Board is a department within the city of Springfield. The Board administers the Dickerson Park Zoo, which is owned by the city. … Ashcroft v. City of Sedalia, 629 S.W.2d 578, 583 (Mo.App.1981) (citations omitted).

State Ex Rel. Walker v. Big Medicine Drainage District No. 1

355 Mo. 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1946

Ashby v. … Chamberlin v. Grand River Drainage Dist. of Cass and Bates Counties, supra; State ex rel. Ashby v. Medicine Creek Drainage Dist., supra. See also Camden Special Road Dist. v. Willow Drainage Dist., Mo.

State v. Parker

458 S.W.2d 241 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1970

Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 ; Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 , No. 750, June 2, 1969. … She had thought his hair dark black when it was described as dark brown at the trial.

Winningham v. Trueblood

149 Mo. 572 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1899

[Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 ; Wickham, Adm’r, v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. loc. cit. 370.] … [State ex rel. v. Board, 108 Mo. loc. cit. 241; State ex rel. v. Laclede Gaslight Co., 102 Mo. loc. cit. 485; Sutherland, Stat. Const., sec.334; State v.Grant,79 Mo. loc. cit.122; State ex rel. v.

Nowden v. Div. of Alcohol & Tobacco Control

552 S.W.3d 114 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 2018

Sys. v. Pemiscot Cty. , 256 S.W.3d 98 , 102 (Mo. banc 2008). "[T]he trial court's judgment may be affirmed on any basis supported by the record." Nail v. … Furlong Cos., Inc. v. City of Kan. City , 189 S.W.3d 157 , 165 (Mo. banc 2006).

Peppers v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

316 Mo. 1104 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1927

The instruction conflicts with the ruling in Hite v. Railroad, 225 S.W. 916 ; Trautmann v. Trautmann, 300 Mo. 314 , 254 S.W. 286 , and Brown v. Foundry Co., 271 S.W. 540 . VI. … State v. Matthews, supra, relying on Prewitt v.

Thompson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

140 Mo. 125 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1897

You stepped down with your right foot on the running board? A. Didn’t get quite down on the running board. *134 “Q. Which post, did you take hold of? There was a'back to this seat? A. Yes, sir. “Q. … Hewitt v. Steele (1893) 118 Mo. 463 ( 24 S. W. Rep. 440 ) ; Bank v. Wood( 1894) 124 Mo. 72 ( 27 S. W. Rep. 554 ); Parker v. Cassingham (1895) 130 Mo. 348 ( 32 S. W. Rep. 487 ).

Branner v. Klaber

330 Mo. 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1932

[See Booth v. Scott, 276 Mo. l.c. 20, 39.] The proposition, which the board accepted, provided that Dr. S.W. … The court in Rogers v. Brown, supra, after discussing former cases, such as Hunter v.

State v. Timeus

232 Mo. 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911

[State ex rel. v. Brown, 141 Mo. 21 ; 8 Cyc. 798.] … Ferriss and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Collet v. Errington

317 S.W.2d 326 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1958

See also State v. Smith, supra, 135 S.W. loc. cit. 470(6); State v. Evertz, Mo., 190 S.W. 287 ; State ex rel. Collet v. Scopel, Mo., 316 S.W.2d 515 ; Hitchcock v. Collenberg, D.C. … Collet v.

Raymore Special Road District v. Huber

212 Mo. 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1908

In State ex rel. v. … We are not prepared to say that a valid law may not be passed and made applicable to counties under both systems of our road law discussed in State ex rel. v. Gordon, supra.

Sipes v. Vaca

397 S.W.2d 658 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1965

Penney v. Warren, 217 Ala. 120 , 115 So. 16 . To the extent that such relief is penal in its nature, it is all the more clearly not granted to the Board by the Federal Acts. Republic Steel Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 7, 10-12 , 61 S.Ct. 77, 78-79, 85 .

Smith v. Culligan

74 Mo. 387 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Darrett v. Donnelly, 38 Mo. 492 ; Nelson v. Brodhack, 44 Mo. 596 . … Armstrong, 62 Mo. 59 ; McGonigle v. Daugherty, 71 Mo. 259 ; Davis v. Brown, 67 Mo. 313 .

Kluck v. Metsger

349 S.W.2d 919 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1961

In Creek v. … In Therrien v.

State v. Davis

194 Mo. 485 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906

v. … [Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114 ; Myer on Vested Rights, sec. 952; People v. Phippin, 70 Mich. 6 ; Board of Med. Exam. v. Fowler, 50 La. Ann. 1358 ; People v. Fulda, 52 Hun (N. Y.) 67.]

Bauer v. City of Berkeley

278 S.W.2d 772 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1955

Holland v. City of St. … Latshaw v. Reeves, 237 Mo.App. 812, 818 , 177 S.W.2d 537, 539 [1-4].

State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Evans

240 Mo. 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1912

Randolph County v. Evans, decided at this term. In this case the State Superintendent of Schools admits that the enumeration of the St. … J., Woodson and Ferriss, JJ., concur; Lamm, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur in result.

State v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

365 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1955

Jones v. Nolte, 350 Mo. 271 , 165 S. … Co. v. Road Improvement Dist. No. 6, 256 U.S. 658 ; 41 S. Ct. 604 , 65 L. Ed. 1151 ; Hillsborough Twp. v. Cromwell, 326 U. S. 620 , 66 S. Ct. 445 , 90 L. Ed. 358 ; State ex rel. Ashby v.

State v. Ross

334 Mo. 870 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1934

[State v. Daily, supra; State v. Kelsay, supra; State v. Cantrell, supra; State v. Pieski, supra; State v. … For cases illustrative of the applicability of such procedure see State v. Kaiser, supra; State v. Daily, supra; State v. Brown, supra; State v. Cantrell, supra; State v. McHenry, supra; State v.

State Ex Rel. Knese v. Kinsey

314 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1926

Louis v. Dreisoerner, 243 Mo. 217 .] … Louis v.