Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

7.21s

  • City of St. Louis v. Buss

    159 Mo. 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1900

    Such compensation shall be ascertained by a jury or board of commissioners of not less than three freeholders, in such manner as may be prescribed by law,” and the cases of Bridge Co. v. … Ring, 58 Mo. 491 , and Rochester Water Works v. Wood, 60 Barb. (N. Y.) 137, are cited.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hickman v. City of Kansas

    120 Mo. 110 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 5, 1894

    Such compensation shall be ascertained by a jury or board of commissioners of not less than three freeholders, in such manner as may be prescribed by law; and tintil the same shall be paid to the owner, or into court for … Railroad v. Waldo, 70 Mo. 629 ; Combs v. Smith, 78 Mo. 32 ; Allen v. Railroad, 84 Mo. 646 ; Railroad v. Calkins, 90 Mo. 538 ; Daugherty v. Brown, 91 Mo. 26 ; Railroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611 ; McReynolds v.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Pleasant View Reorganized School District No. 1 v. Springfield Reorganized School District No. 12

    341 S.W.2d 853 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 9, 1961

    No. 8, Shawnee Tp., Wyandotte County v. Board of Education of Kansas City, 1924, 115 Kan. 806 , 224 P. 892 . … Marked Tree Special School Dist., 1927, 173 Ark. 82 , 291 S.W. 1006 ; Walser v. Board of Education, 1895, 160 Ill. 272 , 43 N.E. 346 , 31 L.R.A. 329 ; Board of Education of Lyme Township v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. City of Carondelet

    38 Mo. 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1866

    An adjudication was made on this statute in the case of Miles v. Caldwell, 2 Wal. (U. … But in 1857 this statutory provision making judgments in ejectment a bar was repealed by the Legislature, and the law restored as it previously existed—Slevin v. Brown, 32 Mo. 176 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Inf. Mansur v. McKown

    315 Mo. 1336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1926

    V. … Simrall v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Abbott v. Marion Mining Co.

    255 Mo. 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 3, 1914

    Lansdown, 21 Mo. 399 ; Clark v. Railroad, supra; Gibson v. Railroad, 225 Mo. 473 . … PER CURIAM -The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Strode

    242 Mo. 210 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1912

    Louis at a meeting of the board held January 16,1883. This record furnished the best evidence obtainable. … Kennish and Brown, JJconcur.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Ranney v. Baeder

    50 Mo. 600 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1872

    In The State, etc., v. … In the case of Marsh v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Ludwig

    322 S.W.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1959

    Graves v. Purcell, 337 Mo. 574, 582-583 , 85 S.W.2d 543, 548 ; State ex rel. Transport Mfg. & Equipment Co. v. Bates, 359 Mo. 1002, 1007 , 224 S.W.2d 996, 999 ; Brown v. State, 323 Mo. 138 , 19 S.W.2d 12 . … Peck Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189, 1193 , 105 S.W.2d 909, 911 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Kansas City Railways Co.

    280 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1919

    [O’Donnell v. Railroad, 197 Mo. l. c. 117.] Macfarlane, J., in the case of Schepers v. Union Depot Ry. … The Schepers and Schaefer oases, supra, are also cited with approval, in the following: Reynolds v. Transit Co., 189 Mo. l. c, 418; Devoy v. Transit Co., 192 Mo. l. c. 210; Nolan v. Railroad, 250 Mo. l. c. 617.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stacy v. Truman Medical Center

    836 S.W.2d 911 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 22, 1992

    In Stallman v. … Corley v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Southers v. City of Farmington, 263 S.W.3d 603 (2008)Cited 46 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. City of Clarence v. Drain

    335 Mo. 741 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 17, 1934

    Official acts cannot be impeached collaterally. ’ ’ [Harbaugh v. Winsor, 38 Mo. 327 ; Wilson v. Kimmel, 109 Mo. 260 , 19 S. W. 24 ; Hill v. Kresge Co., 202 Mo. App. 385 .] … Wahl v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Missouri State Highway Commission v. Hensel Phelps Construction Co.

    634 S.W.2d 168 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1982

    Los Angeles, supra; or, the mistakes resulted from a clerical error: City of Baltimore v. De Luca-Davis Construction Co., 210 Md. 518 , 124 A.2d 557 (1956); State Board of Control v. … Brown v. Fagan, 71 Mo. 563 (1880); Houston v. Welch, 204 Mo.App. 279 , 223 S.W. 1076 (1920); Barrett, Fitch, North & Co. v. Hudson, 403 S.W.2d 944 (Mo.App.1966); S. G. Payne & Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Anton v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

    335 Mo. 188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

    He cites on this point Laurent v. U. Rys. Co. (Mo.), 191 S.W. 992 ; Thomas v. St. L.-S.F. Ry. Co. (Mo. App.), 293 S.W. 1051 ; Brooks v. Union Depot Bridge Term. Co., 215 Mo. App. 643 , 258 S.W. 724 ; Watts v. … one he is about to board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Annex Realty Co.

    173 Mo. 511 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 31, 1903

    [Tulk v. Moxhay, 15 Eng. Ruling Cases 254; Courdert v. Sayre, 46 N. J. Eq. 386; The Howard, etc., Company v. The Water Lot Company, 53 Ga. 689 ; Byers v. Trust Company, 175 Pa. *520 St. 327.] … [Tulk v. Moxhay, 15 Eng. Ruling Cases, 254.]

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McCormack v. McNamee

    274 S.W.2d 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1955

    See State v. … See also Massman v. Kansas City Public Service Co., Mo., 119 S.W.2d 833 , 837[5, 6]; Doran v. Ross, 240 Mo.App. 823 , 221 S.W.2d 756, 757 [1]; Sullivan v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Tebbetts v. Holtcamp

    252 Mo. 333 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1913

    Tebbetts, Petitioner, v. Rebecca Rickart and Lloyd H. Rickart, Respondents, decided at this term, involving the writ of habeas corpus. [Ante, p. 302.] … Brown and Walker, JJ., concur; Lamm, G. J., and Woodson, J., concur for reasons set out in concurring opinion of Graves, J., in In re Letitia Todd Breck et al., minors, Tebbetts, petitioners v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • M. F. A. Milling Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

    350 Mo. 1102 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1943

    Louis Court of Appeals in Wade v. William Barr Dry Goods Co., 155 Mo. App. 405 , 134 S. … The board was attempting to collect from every employee 10 per cent of his salary for unemployment relief. The patrolman brought suit against the board to restrain such collection.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Hampton

    653 S.W.2d 191 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1983

    In Antoine v. … Hickey v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 363 Mo. 1039 , 256 S.W.2d 775, 778 (Mo.1953). The burden of establishing its unconstitutionality rests upon the party questioning it. State v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Matacia v. Buckner

    300 Mo. 359 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 8, 1923

    [In re Sharp, supra, and cases cited; Com. v. Fisher, 213 Pa. 48 ; State v. Brown, 50 Minn. 353 ; Pugh v. Bowden, 54 Fla. 302 ; Ex parte Bowers, 78 Ore l. c. 395; In re Powell, 6 Okla. … The cases chiefly relied upon by relator are unlike this case and have been distinguished in cases cited, and In re Ferrier, 103 Ill. 367 ; Farnham v. Pierce, 141 Mass. l. c. 204; Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473 . III.

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.