Case law

Hite v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

130 Mo. 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1895

Plaintiff boarded at a hotel just south of and adjoining the first curve. … Smith v. Railroad, 32 Minn. 1 ; Railroad v. Gibson, 96 Pa.

Stevens v. Stevens

309 Mo. 130 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 5, 1925

[McGehee v. Garringer, 224 S.W. (Mo.) 828, 831 (3).] … [Bender v. Bender, 281 Mo. 473 , 478; Wilhite v. Wilhite, 284 Mo. 387 , 396; Gilliland v. Gilliland, 96 Mo. 525 ; Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 82 , 92; 1 Perry on Trusts, sec. 143; 21 Cyc. 1255.]

Fink v. Bruihl

47 Mo. 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870

In Cummings v. … This may not be precisely like the case at bar, inasmuch as the plaintiff had leave to discontinue; but in Branham v. Brown’s Adm’x, 1 Bailey, S.

Starks v. Lincoln

316 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1927

Sup.) 8, was ruled upon facts showing insufficient delivery, and the facts in Newell v. Edom, 242 S. W. (Mo. App.) 701, presented no semblance of a trust. In Pitts v. … In Jones v.

Roe v. City of Kansas

100 Mo. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Conceding, as was decided in Tritz v. … Moreover, that case was overruled in the recent case of Walker v. City, 99 Mo. 647 . Judgment affirmed. All concur.

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. North Kansas City

367 S.W.2d 561 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1963

The City could act only through its authorized governing body, its board of aldermen, with respect to the establishment of its sewers. Barton County Rock Asphalt Co. v. … Glidewell v. Hughey, Mo., 314 S.W.2d 749, 756 [10]; State ex rel. State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75, 79 [5], and see State ex rel. Kemper v.

Jackson County v. State Tax Commission

521 S.W.2d 378 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

The Board’s decision that the property was taxable was appealed to the Commission, with an apparent agreement not to challenge the action of the Board as discriminatory, arbitrary or capricious in that these three hospitals … Luke’s and Baptist) who is salaried and responsible to *381 (though not a member of) the board of directors or trustees.

Crews v. Wilson

312 Mo. 643 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1926

Wimer, 23 Mo. l.c. 78; State v. Dwire, 25. Mo. 553; Paulette v. Brown, 40 Mo. l.c. 57; State v. Elkins, 63 Mo. l.c. 166; Brown v. Ry. Co., 66 Mo. l.c. 600; State v. Patrick, 107 Mo. l.c. 162; McFadin v. … Shelton, 223 Mo. l.c. 138-9; State v. Barnes, 274 Mo. 625 ; State v. Marlin, 259 S.W. l.c. 434; State v. Houston, 263 S.W. l.c. 219 and following; State v. Brown, 270 S.W. l.c. 275; State v. Hogan, 273 S.W. l.c. 1062.

President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Gaming Commission

13 S.W.3d 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 2000

City of Marshfield v. Brown, 337 Mo. 1136 , 88 S.W.2d 339, 340 (1935). The Highway Patrol reimbursements are a fee that is reasonably related to the administrative costs. … See id. at 498-99; City of Warrensburg v. Board of Regents of Central Missouri State University, 562 S.W.2d 340, 343-44 (Mo. banc 1978).

Miles v. Armour

239 Mo. 438 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

[Brown on Jurisdiction, sec. 4.] … That court in Hammond Packing Company v. Arkansas, 212 U.

Missouri Wesleyan College v. Shulte

346 Mo. 628 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 16, 1940

Detsch, 61 Mo. 290 ; Pitt et al. v. Gentle, 49 Mo. 74 ; Workman v. Campbell, 46 Mo. 305 ; Trustees of Westminister College v. Estate of Gamble, 42 Mo. 411 ; Koch v. Lay, 38 Mo. 147 ; Heinrich et al. v. Mo. Ill. … Estate of Livingston, 57 Iowa 307 ; Simpson College v. Tuttle, 71 Iowa 596 ; Trustees v. Garvey, 53 Ill. 401 ; Amherst Academy v. Cowls, 6 Pick. 427 ; Pitt v. Gentle, 49 Mo. 747 ; Richelieu Hotel Co. v.

Jump v. McClurg

35 Mo. 193 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1864

It has been held by this court (Davis v. … (Foot v. Knowles, 4 Met. 391 ; Brewer v. Libby, 13 id. 175.) And in New York it is settled, that a writ without the seal of the court is not void, and therefore amendable. (The People v. Dunning, 1 Wend. 17 ; Culver v.

Hughes v. Littrell

75 Mo. 573 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

The case of Rogers v. … It was also held that the case of Hunter v. Hunter, 50 Mo. 445 , to which plaintiff’s counsel has cited us, has no application to such a case as the above.

Russell v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.

332 Mo. 645 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 20, 1933

In the case of O'Callahan v. … In the case of Schulz v.

Offenbacker v. Sodowsky

499 S.W.2d 421 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1973

Appellant asserts that there was no necessity to modify MAI 17.04 in the respect which was done, and pursuant to Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Company, 421 S. … We do not in any way relax the rule announced in Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Company, supra, and any unnecessary modification of MAI should not be made.

Spencer v. O'Neill

100 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Spencer, he (Spencer) remained at that house, boarding with me, from her death until January 19, 1880, and paid nothing for his board, which I told him he must pay, as I could not afford to keep him; occasionally he sent … Ekey v. Inge, 87 Mo. 493 ; Avery v. Fitzgerald, 94 Mo. 207 . It is because of this, that it becomes necessary, in order to put a stop to repeated actions of ejectment, to resort to bills of peace. Primm v.

Curators of the University of Missouri v. University of Kansas City

442 S.W.2d 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1969

Kansas City and its Board of Trustees, the Board of Trustees of Park College, and Norman H. … be used by the Trustees for such purposes of said University as the Trustees may in their sole judgment and discretion deem to be of the greatest advantage to the University, not including the erection of buildings. * ,* v

American Paper Produce Co. v. Carroll

290 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1921

[Remmers v. Remmers, 217 Mo. l.c. 557.] … App. 200 ; Kreitz v. Egelhoff, 231 Mo. 703 .]

State v. Schaal

806 S.W.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1991

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). Schaal began dating L.L. in July, 1986. … State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). Appellant admits that a victim’s uncorroborated testimony is generally sufficient, but cites State v.

Sperry v. Hurd

267 Mo. 628 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1916

[Sauter v. Leveridge, 103 Mo. 615 ; State ex rel. v. Bank, 160 Mo. 640 ; Dakan v. Chase & Son Mercantile Co., 197 Mo. 238 ; Ewing v. Vernon County, 216 Mo. 681 .] In the main opinion in the case of Shohoney v. … [Cook v. Globe Printing Co., 227 Mo. 471 , l. c. 547; Moore v. Transit Co., 226 Mo. 689 ; Clifton v. Railroad, 232 Mo. 708 .]