Case law

Henkrick v. Kurn

352 Mo. 848 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1944

Krause v. Pitcairn, 350 Mo. 339 , 359, 167 S.W.2d 74 ; Bates v. Brown Shoe Co., supra. … Bates v. Brown Shoe Co., supra. The plaintiff's insurmountable difficulty is aptly illustrated by the cases upon which she relies.

State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Mummert

875 S.W.2d 108 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 22, 1994

The MSD Plan provides for a board of six trustees — three appointed by the Mayor of St. … II Article V vests the judicial power of the state in the Supreme Court and other courts. Mo. Const, art. V, § 1.

State v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

242 Mo. 380 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1912

BROWN, J. The issues involved in this appeal are precisely the same as those adjudicated by this *381 court in Banc at the present term in the case entitled State of Missouri v.

Schulenburg v. Bascom

38 Mo. 188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1866

persons who were joint defendants in an execution, it was held to be sufficiently explicit to render mistake impossible, and that it gave substantial information of all that was required in that particular case—Alexander v. … Brown, 1 Pet. 683 . But the same strictness was not required there as in these cases of mechanics’ liens, with regard to which the most rigid rules of construction have generally been adopted.

Miles v. Armour

239 Mo. 438 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

[Brown on Jurisdiction, sec. 4.] … That court in Hammond Packing Company v. Arkansas, 212 U.

Clark v. Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co.

324 Mo. 544 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 3, 1930

[Stauffer v. Railway Co., supra; Goucan v. Cement Co., 317 Mo. 919 , 929, 298 S.W. 789 ; Morris v. Cement Co. (Mo. Sup.), 19 S.W.2d 865 , 872.] … [Gannon v. Gas Light Co., 145 Mo. 502 , 515, 47 S.W. 907 ; Trust Co. v. Hill, 283 Mo. 278 , 282, 223 S.W. 434 ; Keller v. Butchers' Supply Co. (Mo. Sup.), 229 S.W. 173 , 175; Morris v. Cement Co. (Mo.

Banks v. Kansas City Railways Co.

280 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1919

[O’Donnell v. Railroad, 197 Mo. l. c. 117.] Macfarlane, J., in the case of Schepers v. Union Depot Ry. … The Schepers and Schaefer oases, supra, are also cited with approval, in the following: Reynolds v. Transit Co., 189 Mo. l. c, 418; Devoy v. Transit Co., 192 Mo. l. c. 210; Nolan v. Railroad, 250 Mo. l. c. 617.

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. North Kansas City

367 S.W.2d 561 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1963

The City could act only through its authorized governing body, its board of aldermen, with respect to the establishment of its sewers. Barton County Rock Asphalt Co. v. … Glidewell v. Hughey, Mo., 314 S.W.2d 749, 756 [10]; State ex rel. State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75, 79 [5], and see State ex rel. Kemper v.

State v. Finley

234 Mo. 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1911

[State v. Coleman, 199 Mo. 112 ; State v. Finley, 193 Mo. 202 ; State v. Tooker, 188 Mo. 438 .] … Ferriss, J., and Brown, J., concur.

Coney v. State

491 S.W.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1973

This procedure occurred in the presence of Officers Brown, Jacobsmeyer and Niemeyer. … State v.

Hite v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

130 Mo. 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1895

Plaintiff boarded at a hotel just south of and adjoining the first curve. … Smith v. Railroad, 32 Minn. 1 ; Railroad v. Gibson, 96 Pa.

Miller v. Continental Assurance Co. of America

233 Mo. 91 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1911

[State ex rel. v. Phillips, 97 Mo. 331 ; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. l. c. 387 to 393; Cape, etc., Railroad v. Bridge Co., 215 Mo. 287 .] … [Haggerty v. Morrison, 59 Mo. 324 ; Marx v. Hart, 166 Mo. l. c. 517; Dulaney v. Buffum, 173 Mo. l. c. 13; Wait v. Railroad, 204 Mo. l. c. 506.]

Roe v. City of Kansas

100 Mo. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Conceding, as was decided in Tritz v. … Moreover, that case was overruled in the recent case of Walker v. City, 99 Mo. 647 . Judgment affirmed. All concur.

State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 2 of Pike County v. Haid

328 Mo. 739 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 5, 1931

Moss v. Hamilton, 303 Mo. 302 , 260 S.W. 466 ; Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Northwestern Bank, 290 Mo. 311 , 235 S.W. 435 ; Ib., 315 Mo. 849 , 288 S.W. 359 ; Kellogg v. Moore, 271 Mo. 189 , 196 S.W. 15 ; Blodgett v. … Waddell v. Johnson, 316 Mo. 21 . 296 S.W. 806 ; Black v. *Page 749 Early, 208 Mo. 281 , 106 S.W. 1084 ; Sayre v. Tompkins, 23 Mo. 443 ; Gray v. School District (Mo. App.), 28 S.W.2d 683 .]

State v. Schaal

806 S.W.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1991

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). Schaal began dating L.L. in July, 1986. … State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). Appellant admits that a victim’s uncorroborated testimony is generally sufficient, but cites State v.

State Ex Rel. Public Service Commission v. Shain

342 Mo. 867 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 8, 1938

Louis v. Public Service Commission, 329 Mo. 918 , 47 S. W. (2d) 102 ; State ex rel. and to use of Henson v. Brown, 326 Mo. 230 , 31 S. W. (2d) 208 ; State ex rel. City of Harrisonville v. … [State ex rel. and to use of Henson v. Brown, supra; State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 233 S. W. 425 .] Respondents ruled that appellants sustained that burden.

President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Gaming Commission

13 S.W.3d 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 2000

City of Marshfield v. Brown, 337 Mo. 1136 , 88 S.W.2d 339, 340 (1935). The Highway Patrol reimbursements are a fee that is reasonably related to the administrative costs. … See id. at 498-99; City of Warrensburg v. Board of Regents of Central Missouri State University, 562 S.W.2d 340, 343-44 (Mo. banc 1978).

American Paper Produce Co. v. Carroll

290 Mo. 204 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1921

[Remmers v. Remmers, 217 Mo. l.c. 557.] … App. 200 ; Kreitz v. Egelhoff, 231 Mo. 703 .]

Starks v. Lincoln

316 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1927

Sup.) 8, was ruled upon facts showing insufficient delivery, and the facts in Newell v. Edom, 242 S. W. (Mo. App.) 701, presented no semblance of a trust. In Pitts v. … In Jones v.

Spencer v. O'Neill

100 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Spencer, he (Spencer) remained at that house, boarding with me, from her death until January 19, 1880, and paid nothing for his board, which I told him he must pay, as I could not afford to keep him; occasionally he sent … Ekey v. Inge, 87 Mo. 493 ; Avery v. Fitzgerald, 94 Mo. 207 . It is because of this, that it becomes necessary, in order to put a stop to repeated actions of ejectment, to resort to bills of peace. Primm v.