Case law

State Ex Rel. Kansas City Missouri Navigation Co. v. Dew

312 Mo. 300 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1925

Penfield, 233 Mo. 391, 429 ; State ex rel. v. Poster, 225 Mo. 171 .] … [Milliken v. Commis *320 sion Co., 202 Mo. 654 .] The hill must therefore be considered as a whole and characterized according to its general scope and tenor.

Josephine Hospital Corporation v. Modoc Realty Co.

307 Mo. 336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1925

[Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Bank, 290 Mo. 312 ; Union National Bank v. State National Bank, 155 Mo. 95 ; McKeag v. Collins, 87 Mo. 164 ; Hall v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 145 Mo. 418 .] … In Tyler Estate v. Hoffman, 146 Mo. App. 510 , and Sinclair Coal Co. v. Mining Co., 207 S.

State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Elliott

326 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 5, 1959

See also Handlan-Buck Company v. State Highway Commission, Mo., 315 S.W.2d 219, 223 ; Selecman v. Matthews, 321 Mo. 1047 , 15 S.W.2d 788, 789-790 , 63 A.L.R. 512 ; Board of Commissioners of Harmon County v. … Taylor v. Nangle, Mo., 227 S.W.2d 655, 657 . The provisional rule in prohibition is made absolute. All concur. . Now 23 U.S.C.A. §§ 103 (d), 101(b), 111. . Now 23 U.S.C.A. § 109 (b).

State Ex Rel. School District of Independence v. Jones

653 S.W.2d 178 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1983

Reorganized School District R — 9 v. Windes, 513 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.1974) (certiorari from determination of arbitration board on apportionment of property); School District of Mexico v. … Francois County School District R-I1I v. Lalumondier, 518 S.W.2d at 643 , followed in City of Richmond Heights v. Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338, 341-42 (Mo. banc 1979) (see also pp. 343-44). 12 .

Davidson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

301 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1923

[Mangold v. Bacon, 237 Mo. l. c. 511, paragraph 2 on pages 511 et seq. and cases cited. See also dissenting opinion in the Mangold Case, 237 Mo. l. c. 525.] II. … Judge Brown concludes by citing approvingly Neth v. Delano, 184 Mo.

Ensworth v. Albin

46 Mo. 450 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1870

(See Sharpless et al. v. The Mayor of Philadelphia, 21 Penn. 147 ; Morrison v. Springer, 15 Iowa, 304 .) 3. … The case presents no issue as to the action of the board in receiving *455 or rejecting applicants for registration.

Smith v. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co.

326 Mo. 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 4, 1930

There was a board walk, about three feet wide, running the length of the bridge between said tracks. The bridge extended from east to west. … Co., 312 Mo. 173 ; Edmondson v. Hotels Statler, 306 Mo. 216 ; Brown v. St. L. S.F. Ry. Co., 227 S.W. 1069 ; Koonse v. Standard Steel Works Co., 221, Mo. App. 1231; Johnson v. K.C. Bolt Nut Co., 172 Mo.

State ex rel. Christopher v. Matthews

362 Mo. 242 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 1951

The court may feel that the decision of the board was the best that could have been rendered under the circumstances. It may thoroughly disagree with the reasoning by which the board reached its decision. … It may feel that the decision of the board was *248 a substandard piece of logic and thinking.

City of St. Louis v. Boffinger

19 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1853

Louis v. McCoy, it may be well again to state the principles upon which the decision rests. … Any steamboat coming from New Orleans, or any point below the city of Memphis, having on board, on her arrival within the quarantine limits, or having had on board at any time during her voyage, a greater number of deck or

Rambo v. Lawson

799 S.W.2d 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1990

I believe that O'Grady v. Brown, 654 S.W.2d 904 (Mo. banc 1983), is incorrect. On the rationale employed by the principal opinion in this case O'Grady should be overruled. … Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Southworth, 704 S.W.2d 219, 224 (Mo. banc 1986).

Seymour v. Citizens' Railway Co.

114 Mo. 266 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1893

Burns v. Railroad, 50 Mo. 139 ; Railroad v. Walling, 97 Pa. St. 55; Maguire v. Railroad, 115 Mass. 239 ; Railroad v. May, 27 American & English Railroad Cases, 151; Meesel v. Railroad, 8 Allen, 234 ; Nolan v. … . *273 In Geitz v. Railroad, 72 Wis. 307 , the plaintiff took passage on an open street railroad ear. The seats were all occupied, and passengers were standing upon the foot-boards running from platform to platform.

Erdman v. Auer

444 S.W.2d 427 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1969

Kansas City v. … Bohon, 349 Mo. 667 , 162 S.W.2d 867, 871 [9]; Butler v. Board of Education, Mo., 16 S.W.2d 44 , 45 [6].

Ex Parte Albright v. Clinger

290 Mo. 83 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1921

Upon being apprised of relator’s violation of his parole, the Board of Prison Managers of that State revoked same. At the time his whereabouts were unknown to the board. … [Kurtz v. State, 22 Fla. 36 .]

State Ex Rel. Harry L. Hussman Refrigerator & Supply Co. v. City of St. Louis

319 Mo. 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1928

In Pitman v. … Attorney-General v.

State ex rel. Funkhouser v. Spencer

164 Mo. 23 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1901

Francis, 88 Mo. 557 ), nor in a proceeding before a school board to contest the election of one of its directors (State ex rel. v. … Thomas v.

McAnany ex rel. McAnany v. Henrici

238 Mo. 103 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 29, 1911

[Benjamin v. Street Railway Co., 133 Mo. l. c. 289 ; Gregory v. Chambers, 78 Mo. 294 ; Hurt v. Railroad, 94 Mo. 255 ; Railroad v. Union Stock Yards Co., 120 Mo. 541 .] … [See cases previously cited; also Benjamin v. Railway, 50 Mo. App. 602 ; Riley v. Sparks, 52 Mo. App. 572 ; Bradford v. Railway, 64 Mo. App. 475 ; Turner v. Haar, 114 Mo. 335 ; Goins v. Railway, 47 Mo.

State v. Priesmeyer

327 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1931

He signed his name Frank Brown. The defendants offered evidence to show that there was a Frank Brown, and the State offered evidence to show there was no such person. … [State v. Buckley, 318 Mo. 25 ; State v. Forshee, 199 Mo. 145 ; State v. Strait, 279 S. W. 109 ; 16 C. J. 661-2.]

Pfarr v. Union Electric Co.

389 S.W.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1965

I am of the opinion that the rule applied in the case of Board of Commissioners for Clarendon County v. Holliday, 182 S.C. 510 , 189 S.E. 885 , 109 A,L.R. 1496, should be applied here. … Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., Mo., 287 S.W.2d 761, 766-767 ; State ex inf. Shartel ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co., Banc, 331 Mo. 337 , 53 S.W.2d 394 , 89 A.L.R. 607 .

Strandberg v. Kansas City

415 S.W.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1967

Coffin v. City of Lee’s Summit, Mo.App., 357 S.W.2d 211 ; Kansas City v. Brown, 286 Mo. 1 , 227 S.W. 89, 95 [9]; State ex rel. Russell v. Gardner, 218 Mo.App. 217 , 265 S.W. 996, 1002 [5]; 101 C.J.S. … Joint Council of Women’s Auxiliaries Welfare Ass’n, Mo., 265 S.W.2d 374, 377 [5]; Hedin v. Board of County Commissioners, 209 Md. 224 , 120 A. 2d 663, 666 [3].

State Ex Rel. Vance v. Nodaway Drainage District No. One

313 Mo. 302 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1926

Jones v. Chariton Drainage Dist., 252 Mo. 345 ; State ex rel. McWilliams v. Little River Drainage Dist., 269 Mo. 444 ; State ex rel. Caruthers v. Little River Drainage Dist., 271 Mo. 429 ; State ex rel. Kinder v. … McWilliams v.