Case law

Hill v. City of St. Louis

159 Mo. 159 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1900

App. 160 ; State v. Noland, 111 Mo. l. c. 484; State ex rel. v. Slover, 113 Mo. 202 ; Rogers v. … The distinction drawn by the court of appeals between cases where there is no remedy afforded, as illustrated by the School Board cases, of School District v. Livers, 147 Mo. 580 , and St. Louis Public Schools v.

State v. Rebasti

306 Mo. 336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1924

In Brown v. New Jersey, supra, Mr. … [Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.

City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.

263 Mo. 508 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 25, 1915

Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant, numbered 17254, decided at 'this term. The judgment, therefore, in the instant case (No. 17579) is affirmed, and it is so ordered. Lamm, G. … J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in a separate opinion filed in No. 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 2 v. Ingram

317 Mo. 1141 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 16, 1927

[State ex rel. v. Meek, 129 Mo. 431 ; State ex rel. v. Rombauer, 101 Mo. 499 , 104 Mo. 619 , 105 Mo. 103 ; State ex rel. v. Bus, 135 Mo. 325 ; State ex inf. v. Fasse, 189 Mo. 532 ; Ramsey v. … [State ex rel. v. Dillon, 90 Mo. 229 ; State ex rel. v. Spencer, 91 Mo. 206 ; State ex rel. v. Bus, 135 Mo. 325 ; State ex rel. v. Higgins, 144 Mo. 410 ; Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Blake, 242 Mo. 23 ; Hasting v.

State Ex Rel. Ashby v. Medicine Creek Drainage District

284 Mo. 636 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1920

In the first case (State ex rel. v. … [Rex v. Lindsey, 14 East, (Eng.) 317; Rex v. Kerrison, 3 M. & S. (Eng.) 526; Penn. Railroad Co. v. Irwin, 85 Pa. St. 336; Richardson Co. v. Drainage Dist., 92 Neb. 776 .]

Padgitt v. Moll

52 L.R.A. 854 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1900

Railroad, 72 Mo. 62 ; Whitehead v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 263 ; Buck v. Railroad, 108 Mo. 185 . … In Muehlhausen v.

Stepp v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road District

257 Mo. 624 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

Embree et al. v. Kansas City-Liberty Boulevard Road District of Clay County, just decided. [Ante, p. 593.] … J., dubitante; Brown, J., dissents; Paris, J., not sitting.

Dorriss v. Carter

67 Mo. 544 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

In Kennedy v. … In Keithley v. May, 29 Mo. 220 ; Browning v. Chrisman, 30 Mo. 353 , and Adderton v.

Donahoo v. Thompson

291 S.W.2d 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1956

Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 383 , 71 S.Ct. 359 , 95 L.Ed. 364 ; Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 . … Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 332, 335 , 64 S.Ct. 576, 579 , 88 L.Ed. 762, 766 ; Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 3 Cir., 210 F.2d 623, 626 .

State v. Moore

106 Mo. 480 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

State v. Broderick, 59 Mo. 318 . II. The instruction, authorizing a conviction of petit larceny, was properly refused. … State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 . Finding that the court and jury committed no error in the trial of defendant the judgment is affirmed. All concur.

Pfarr v. Union Electric Co.

389 S.W.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1965

I am of the opinion that the rule applied in the case of Board of Commissioners for Clarendon County v. Holliday, 182 S.C. 510 , 189 S.E. 885 , 109 A,L.R. 1496, should be applied here. … Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., Mo., 287 S.W.2d 761, 766-767 ; State ex inf. Shartel ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co., Banc, 331 Mo. 337 , 53 S.W.2d 394 , 89 A.L.R. 607 .

State v. Green

263 Mo. 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1915

From said writ, it appears that, on November 21, 1911, appellant became surety upon a recognizance for the appearance of one Ethel Green, alias Ethel Brown, before the St. … , the surety was, upon the above showing, entitled, as a matter of right, to “be discharged from any further liability upon the recognizance. ’ ’ This is the view taken of said section by this court in the case of State v.

State ex rel. Allen v. Mayor of St. Louis

73 Mo. 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1881

Similar adjudications upon a like point have been made in the states of Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska, in the following cases: People v. Brown, 11 Ill. 478 ; Chestnutwood v. Hood, 68 Ill. 132 ; Bayard v. … Klinge, 16 Minn. 249 ; State v. Swift, 69 Ind. 505 ; State ex rel. v. Lancaster Co., 6 Neb. 474 .

Bank of Oak Ridge v. Duncan

328 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1931

Charles Savings Bank v. Denker, 275 Mo. 607 , 205 S.W. 208 .] … [Secs. 394, 395, R.S. 1929; Judson v. Walker, 155 Mo. 166 , 55 S.W. 1083 ; Webb v. Hayden, 166 Mo. 39 , 65 S.W. 760 .] This court in Bank of Darlington v.

Meredith v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

467 S.W.2d 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1971

Respondent, in support of the trial court’s ruling, relies primarily upon the decision of the court en banc in Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo.Sup., 421 S.W.2d 255 . … Under the authority of Brown v. St.

State Ex Rel. Bank of Nashua v. Holt

348 Mo. 982 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1941

Jones v. Cook, 174 Mo. 100 , 73 S.W. 489 .] … [For a case recognizing the right of an educational corporation to change location see Grand River College v. Robertson, 67 Mo. App. 329 ; see also, 7 Am. Jur. 44 , sec. 31; 13 Am.

Vinyard v. St. Louis County

399 S.W.2d 99 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1966

Andrews v. Metropolitan Bldg. Co., 349 Mo. 927 , 163 S.W.2d 1024 ; Noel v. Hill, 158 Mo.App. 426 , 138 S.W. 364 ; Sanders v. Dixon, 114 Mo.App. 229 , 89 S.W. 577 ; Miller v. … Klein, 177 Mo.App. 557 , 160 S.W. 562 ; Pierce v. Harper, 311 Mo. 301 , 278 S.W. 410 . 2 . Mellitz v. Sunfield Co., 103 Conn. 177 , 129 A. 228 ; Laughlin v. Wagner, 146 Tenn. 647 , 244 S.W. 475 ; Starmount Co. v.

State ex rel. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Public Service Commission

333 Mo. 426 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 3, 1933

Ponath v. Hamilton (Mo.), 240 S. W. 445 ; Custer v. Kroeger, 313 Mo. 130 , 280 S. W. 1035 , 44 A. L. R. 1328; Bushman v. Barlow, 321 Mo. 1052 , 15 S. W. (2d) 329 ; Kinnerk v. Smith, 328 Mo. 513 , 41 S. … Egan on the board of directors of the Laclede Company has already resulted in litigation.

Barnes v. Imhoff

238 Mo. 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1911

BROWN, C. The facts in this case are identical with those shown by the record in Butler v.

Bushong v. Taylor

82 Mo. 660 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Church v. Shulze, 61 Ind. 511 ; Linn v. Carson, supra; Price v. M. E. Church, 4 Ohio 515 ; Trustees M. E. Church v. Garvey, 53 Ill. 401 ; Van Houten v. Dutch Church, 17 N. J. Eq. 126. … V.