Case law

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Kirby

349 Mo. 988 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1942

[State ex rel. v. Davis, 44 Mo. 129 ; State ex inf. v. Evans, 166 Mo. 347 , 66 S. W. 355 ; Gregory v. Kansas City, 244 Mo. 523 , 149 S. W. 466 ; State ex rel. v. Kansas City, 310 Mo. 542 , 276 S. … Of recent years it is universally exercised by the so-called quasi-judicial boards and commissions.

Special District for the Education & Training of Handicapped Children of St. Louis County v. Wheeler

408 S.W.2d 60 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1966

In McVey v. … We must apply the statute as written. *64 Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Thomason, Mo., 384 S.W.2d 651, 659 . Our view is well stated in State v.

Bradley v. Goff

243 Mo. 95 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1912

S. 1909, sec. 11498; Vance v. Corrigan, 78 Mo. 94 .] It was the duty of the owners of the life estate to pay the ordinary annual taxes assessed against the property. [Hall v. French, 165 Mo. l. c. 438; Bone v. … S. 1909, sec. 2787; Brown v. Fulkerson, 125 Mo. l. c. 403; Godman v. Simmons, 113 Mo. 127 .]

State v. Rebasti

306 Mo. 336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1924

In Brown v. New Jersey, supra, Mr. … [Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U.

State v. Williams

515 S.W.2d 544 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 14, 1974

Strohmeyer described him as 35 or 40 years old, around 5'9" to 5'11" tall, skinny, with dark brown curly hair and wearing a brown corduroy coat. “He was Mexican or something like that.” … State v. Mills, 465 S.W.2d 554, 555 [1] (Mo.1971); State v. Cox, 478 S.W.2d 339, 341 [3, 4] (Mo.1972); State v. Austin, 496 S.W.2d 799 (Mo.1973).

State Ex Rel. Ashby v. Medicine Creek Drainage District

284 Mo. 636 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1920

In the first case (State ex rel. v. … [Rex v. Lindsey, 14 East, (Eng.) 317; Rex v. Kerrison, 3 M. & S. (Eng.) 526; Penn. Railroad Co. v. Irwin, 85 Pa. St. 336; Richardson Co. v. Drainage Dist., 92 Neb. 776 .]

State v. Hicks

959 S.W.2d 119 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1997

State v. Brown, 939 S.W.2d 882, 883 (Mo. banc 1997). … State v. Brown, 916 S.W.2d 420, 422 (Mo.App.1996). Juror McIntosh’s conversations, “while improper, was casual, brief and totally unrelated to anything associated with the trial.” State v.

Padgitt v. Moll

52 L.R.A. 854 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1900

Railroad, 72 Mo. 62 ; Whitehead v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 263 ; Buck v. Railroad, 108 Mo. 185 . … In Muehlhausen v.

Stepp v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road District

257 Mo. 624 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

Embree et al. v. Kansas City-Liberty Boulevard Road District of Clay County, just decided. [Ante, p. 593.] … J., dubitante; Brown, J., dissents; Paris, J., not sitting.

Dorriss v. Carter

67 Mo. 544 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

In Kennedy v. … In Keithley v. May, 29 Mo. 220 ; Browning v. Chrisman, 30 Mo. 353 , and Adderton v.

Rider v. Julian

365 Mo. 313 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1955

Co. v. … State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75 ; Kansas City v. Tiernan, 356 Mo. 138 , 202 S.W.2d 20 .

Donahoo v. Thompson

291 S.W.2d 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1956

Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 383 , 71 S.Ct. 359 , 95 L.Ed. 364 ; Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 . … Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 332, 335 , 64 S.Ct. 576, 579 , 88 L.Ed. 762, 766 ; Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 3 Cir., 210 F.2d 623, 626 .

State v. Moore

106 Mo. 480 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

State v. Broderick, 59 Mo. 318 . II. The instruction, authorizing a conviction of petit larceny, was properly refused. … State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 . Finding that the court and jury committed no error in the trial of defendant the judgment is affirmed. All concur.

Pfarr v. Union Electric Co.

389 S.W.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1965

I am of the opinion that the rule applied in the case of Board of Commissioners for Clarendon County v. Holliday, 182 S.C. 510 , 189 S.E. 885 , 109 A,L.R. 1496, should be applied here. … Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., Mo., 287 S.W.2d 761, 766-767 ; State ex inf. Shartel ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co., Banc, 331 Mo. 337 , 53 S.W.2d 394 , 89 A.L.R. 607 .

State v. Green

263 Mo. 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1915

From said writ, it appears that, on November 21, 1911, appellant became surety upon a recognizance for the appearance of one Ethel Green, alias Ethel Brown, before the St. … , the surety was, upon the above showing, entitled, as a matter of right, to “be discharged from any further liability upon the recognizance. ’ ’ This is the view taken of said section by this court in the case of State v.

State ex rel. Allen v. Mayor of St. Louis

73 Mo. 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1881

Similar adjudications upon a like point have been made in the states of Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska, in the following cases: People v. Brown, 11 Ill. 478 ; Chestnutwood v. Hood, 68 Ill. 132 ; Bayard v. … Klinge, 16 Minn. 249 ; State v. Swift, 69 Ind. 505 ; State ex rel. v. Lancaster Co., 6 Neb. 474 .

Bank of Oak Ridge v. Duncan

328 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1931

Charles Savings Bank v. Denker, 275 Mo. 607 , 205 S.W. 208 .] … [Secs. 394, 395, R.S. 1929; Judson v. Walker, 155 Mo. 166 , 55 S.W. 1083 ; Webb v. Hayden, 166 Mo. 39 , 65 S.W. 760 .] This court in Bank of Darlington v.

State Ex Rel. Bank of Nashua v. Holt

348 Mo. 982 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1941

Jones v. Cook, 174 Mo. 100 , 73 S.W. 489 .] … [For a case recognizing the right of an educational corporation to change location see Grand River College v. Robertson, 67 Mo. App. 329 ; see also, 7 Am. Jur. 44 , sec. 31; 13 Am.

Taylor v. Farmers Bank of Chariton County

349 Mo. 407 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1942

At that time, it was decided by the board that this loan would have to be reduced to the $10,000.00 basis. Four members of the board put up *413 a sufficient amount of money and paid all but $10,000.00 of this loan. … See, also, Asher v. West End Bank, supra; Todd v. Davidson, 19 N. E. (2d) 236; Shaw v. McShane, 50 S. W. (2d) 278 .

State ex rel. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Public Service Commission

333 Mo. 426 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 3, 1933

Ponath v. Hamilton (Mo.), 240 S. W. 445 ; Custer v. Kroeger, 313 Mo. 130 , 280 S. W. 1035 , 44 A. L. R. 1328; Bushman v. Barlow, 321 Mo. 1052 , 15 S. W. (2d) 329 ; Kinnerk v. Smith, 328 Mo. 513 , 41 S. … Egan on the board of directors of the Laclede Company has already resulted in litigation.