Case law

State Ex Rel. Keitel v. Harris

353 Mo. 1043 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1945

This was held of the former State Board of Mediation and. … A., unless otherwise indicated, 2 Lucas v. Murphy, 348 Mo. 1078, 1082 , 156 S. W. (2d) 686, 688 ; Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Comp. Comm., 348 Mo. 147, 162 , 152 S. W. (2d) 184, 191 ; Streckfus Steamers v.

Steinmetz v. Nichols

352 Mo. 1047 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 2, 1944

In Fisher v. Pullman Co., 212 Mo. … Bryant v. Kansas City Rys. Co., 286 Mo. 342 , 228 S.W. 472 , 474; Mueller v. Schien, 352 Mo. 180 , 176 S.W.2d 449 , 455.

State ex rel. Greene County v. Lydy

242 Mo. 316 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 23, 1912

BROWN, J. The issues in this case are precisely the same as those decided by this court In Banc in State ex rel. Buchanan County v. … Joe Railroad Company v. Knudson, 62 Mo. 569 , l. c. 571; State ex rel. Gilbert v. Eldridge, 65 Mo. 584 ,l. c. 586; Christie v. Railroad, 94 Mo. l. c. 456.]

Bloomfield Reorganized School District No. R-14, Stoddard County v. Stites

336 S.W.2d 95 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 9, 1960

Moore v. Board of Regents, 215 Mo. 705 , 115 S.W. 6 ; Austin-Griffith, Inc. v. Goldberg, 224 S.C. 372 , 79 S.E.2d 447 , 42 A.L.R.2d 1123 . … Thompson v. St. Charles County, 227 Mo. 220 , 126 S.W. 1044 , and compare Ward v. Haren, 139 Mo.App. 8 , 119 S.W. 446 , and Christopher & Simpson Architectural Iron & Foundry Co. v. E. A.

Shannon Robinson v. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Respondent; St. Louis County, Appellant; Board of Trustees, Livingston County Health Center and Melanie Hutton, Administrator, Cooper County Public Health Center, Appellants; Jefferson County Health Center, Appellant; Jackson County, Missouri

Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 2023

Wilson v. City of St. … This Court, in Frost v.

Gates ex rel. Gates v. Tauchen

497 S.W.2d 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 16, 1973

McCloskey v. Koplar, 329 Mo. 527 , 46 S.W.2d 557, 558 (banc 1932); Walsh v. Phillips, 399 S.W. 2d 123 (Mo. 1966); Brown v. Bryan, 419 S.W.2d 62, 63 (Mo.1967). McLaughlin v. … Plaza House, Inc., 471 S.W.2d 207, 213 (Mo. banc 1971), or it can be implicit in the requirement of management and control in the defendant, as in Brown v. Bryan, supra 419 S.W.2d at 67 and Epps v.

City of Joplin v. Jasper County

349 Mo. 441 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 5, 1942

[Contra: Town of Manchester v. Town of Townshend, 109 Vt. 65 , 192 Atl. 22 .] And so Maricopa County and its Board of Supervisors could sue the Arizona Board of Social Security and Public. … Welfare and obtain a declaration as to which party was under the duty of furnishing and paying for the quarters to be occupied by the County Board of Social Security. [Maricopa County v.

Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of Potosi

355 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1946

In Baum v. City of St. … .: compliance with the charter requirement that the Board of Public Service of the City recommend the passage of the proposed ordinance. Thornburgh v. School Dist.

Junkins v. Local Union No. 6313, Communication Workers of America

263 S.W.2d 337 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1954

Inasmuch as the divisional executive board was to be abolished April 2, 1951, plaintiff’s appeal was forwarded to the Executive Board of the International Union at Washington, which board, upon review, set aside the decision … Teague v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 53 ; Mason v. Hitchcock, 1 Cir., 108 F.2d 134 ; Lundberg v. Chicago Great Western Ry.

State v. Watson

356 Mo. 590 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1947

Brown (Mo.), 267 S.W. 871 , 872[3]. Note instructions in State v. Tetrick, 199 Mo. 100 , 97 S.W. 564 . … State v. Porter (Mo.), 81 S.W.2d 316 , 318[4]. See State v. Brown, supra. Instruction No. 1 told the jury if they found, beyond a reasonable doubt, "that . . . defendants . . .

Mudd v. Quinn

462 S.W.2d 757 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1971

Under Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255, 257 , when an MAI instruction is applicable, its use is mandatory. The trial judge had no alternative but to give MAI 5.03 and to refuse defendants’ No. … Tripp v.

State ex rel. Pehle v. Stamm

165 Mo. 73 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1901

Section 7518 and 7519 confer power upon such board to hear and determine complaints and equalize the valuation of both real and personal property, while section 7520 gives the board of equalization power to hear appeals from … In Thomas v.

State v. Pennick

364 S.W.2d 556 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1963

Brown had completely stopped. Mr. Brown stopped his car because he had seen defendant’s car approaching in the wrong traffic lane. The point of impact was 160 feet south of the north end of the viaduct. … Daggs v. McDermott, 327 Mo. 73 , 34 S.W.2d 46; Hume v. Wright (Mo.Sup.) 274 S.W. 741 .” Richards Brick Co. v. Wright, 231 Mo.App. 946 , 82 S.W.2d 274, 279 . See also Randall v. St. Albans Farms, Inc., Mo.

City of Kirkwood v. Venable

351 Mo. 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 , 555, 56 S.W. 298 ; Kansas City v. Hyde, 196 Mo. 498 , 513, 96 S.W. 201 . If the evidence discloses that the proposed use is a private one then there is no right to condemn. … Appellant, in support of her contention that the proceeding here was to serve a private purpose, cites Kansas City v. Hyde, supra; St. Louis v. Brown, supra; Aldridge v. Spears, 101 Mo. 400 , 406, 14 S.W. 118 ; St.

City of Kennett v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

610 S.W.2d 623 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1981

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners v. Industrial Commission, 363 S.W.2d 82 , 89 (Mo.App.1962). As stated in Board of Education v. … See Board of Education v. Shank, supra; City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission, supra at 695; and Woodman Engineering Co. v. Butler, 442 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Mo.App.1969).

Page Western, Inc. v. Community Fire Protection District

636 S.W.2d 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 2, 1982

As to the second question, § 321.220, RSMo 1978 provides: Powers of board. — For the purpose of providing fire protection to the property within the district, the district and, on its behalf, the board shall have the following … Hewlett v. Womach, supra; Vest v. City of Kansas City, supra; see Nickols v. North Kansas City, 358 Mo. 402 , 214 S.W.2d 710 (1948); City of Maryville v.

Long v. Seay

72 Mo. 648 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

Clark, to the board of education of the city of Rolla school corporation, of which he was appointed treasurer in 1873, and continued as such until 1876. … See Savings Bank of Hannibal v. Hunt, ante, p. 597. Appellant’s counsel, in his brief, insists upon no other error, and the judgment is affirmed. All concur..

Perkinson v. Hoolan

182 Mo. 189 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1904

The petition merely requested the Board of. … In Verdin v. St.

State v. Hubbard

223 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1909

Bobbitt, 215 Mo. l. c. 43; State v. Donnelly, 130 Mo. 642 ; State v. Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137 ; State v. Robinson, 117 Mo. l. c. 663.] … [State v. Blitz, 171 Mo. 530 ; State v. Brooks, 202 Mo. l. c. 117 and 118, and cases cited.]

Eminence Land & Mining Co. v. Current River Land & Cattle Co.

187 Mo. 420 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1905

Brown, one of plaintiff’s attorneys, but Mr. Brown said that Mr. Shuck was mistaken. Mr. Brown was the purchaser at the tax sale and was a witness for the plaintiff. … [State ex rel. v. Staley, 76 Mo. 158 ; Quigley v. Bank, 80 Mo. 289 ; Charles v. Morrow, 99 Mo. 638 .]