Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.29s
45 Mo. 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869
In Sparks v. … In New York the board of supervisors settle with the county treasurer, and in Supervisors of Chenango v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedCarpenter v. City of St. Joseph
263 Mo. 705 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1915
[State ex rel. v. Tate, 109 Mo. l. c. 269; Mueller v. Kaessmann, 84 Mo. l. c. 330; Snell v. Harrison, 83 Mo. l. c. 660; Weil v. … [Field v. Mark, 125 Mo. l. c. 516; Price v. Breckenridge, 77 Mo. l. c. 451; State v. Wells, 70 Mo. l. c. 637; State v. Walters, 69 Mo. l. c. 465; State v.
Cited 14 timesPublished67 Mo. 694 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878
Burgess v. Gray, 15 Mo. 220; Aubuchon v. Ames, *704 27 Mo. 93 ; LeBeau v. Armitage, 47 Mo. 138 ; Landes v. Brant, 10 How. 374 ; Burgess v. Gray, 16 How. 48 ; McGuire v. Tyler, 8 Wall. 657 . … Gibson v. Chouteau, 13 Wall. 92 ; McIlhinney v. Ficke, 61 Mo. 329 ; Millers. Dunn, 62 Mo. 216 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedEgan v. ST. ANTHONY'S MEDICAL CENTER
244 S.W.3d 169 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 5, 2008
V, sec. 10. Reversed and remanded. 1 BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Robert Egan, a board-certified general and vascular surgeon, has practiced surgery in the state of Missouri for forty-two years. … Anthony’s board of directors. 3 . Clemons v. Fairview Med. Ctr. Inc., 449 So.2d 788 (Ala.1984); Kiester v. Humana Hosp. Alaska, Inc., 843 P.2d 1219, 1222 (Alaska 1992); Bock v. John C.
Cited 17 timesPublished76 Mo. 660 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1882
Sharpe v. Johnston, 59 Mo. 557 ; VanSickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627 ; State v. Railey, 35 Mo. 168 ; Brant v. Higgins, 10 Mo. 728 ; Graham v. Noble, 13 Serg. & R. 233; Bacon v. Towne, 4 Cush. 217 . … Sharpe v. Johnston, 59 Mo. 557 ; Casperson v. Sproule, 39 Mo. 39 ; Brant v. Higgins, 10 Mo. 728 .
Cited 43 timesPublished21 Mo. 142 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1855
There was, then, no necessity to state that such work was done “ on the boat” or “on board of the boat,” in so many words. It appears sufficiently certain that it was done on board. In the case of Luft v. … the boat or vessel,” or for services performed on board the boat or vessel.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCarrington v. City of St. Louis
89 Mo. 208 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886
Bassett v. St. Joseph, 53 Mo. 298 ; Russell v. Columbia, 74 Mo. 490 . … No such declarations seem to have been made in the statute with respect to the board of police commissioners of Baltimore, under which the case of Attwater v. The Mayor, etc., 31 Md. 462 , was decided.
Cited 53 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Better-Built Home & Mortgage Co. v. Davis
302 Mo. 307 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1924
Both would he invalid under the late ruling in State ex rel. v. McKelvey, recently decided, on the ground of taking private property for public use without compensation, if not upon other grounds. … Co. v. O’Connor and Kansas City, 256 S. W. 798 .] So it is immaterial whether the lawmakers cannot act before the action of the commission, or whether or not such body must enact into ordinance their report.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCity of St. Louis v. Alexander
23 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1856
(Per Harrington, Judge, in Rice v. Foster, 4 Harrington, 499 . See Parker v. Commonwealth, 6 Barr, Penn., 510; State v. Field, 17 Mo. 529 ; Aurora v. United States, 7 Cranch, 882 .) … In Gordon v. Preston, ( 1 Watts, 886 ,) a mortgage wa_s made by a quorum of the board, but at a meeting not regularly called.
Cited 59 timesPublished342 Mo. 851 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1938
Blue Springs v. … Clark County v. Hackmann, 280 Mo. 686 , 218 S.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmelser v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.
262 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1914
In Hegberg v. Railroad, supra, and Johnson v. … Brown and Far Is, JJconcur in paragraph three and the result.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState ex rel. Gibson v. Lounsberry
125 Mo. 157 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1894
In the recent case of State ex rel. v. … In Thomas v.
Cited 2 timesPublished232 Mo. 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 7, 1911
[State v. Fraser, 220 Mo. 34 ; State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. l. c. 704; State v. Maddox, 153 Mo. l. c. 473; State v. Brooks, 92 Mo. l. c. 596.] In the recent case of State v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.
Cited 3 timesPublishedF. G. Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County
121 Mo. 614 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1894
In State ex rel. v. … Hill v. Fogg, 41 Mo. 563 ; Bank v. Robidoux, 57 Mo. 446 ; Hotel Co. v. Sauer, 65 Mo. 279 . The decision of Moore v.
Cited 22 timesPublished328 Mo. 843 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 28, 1931
[Minneapolis Railway Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U. S. 26 ; Jones v. Brim, 165 U. S. 180 .] In Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. … The right is sustained because the act of such board is in no sense judicial. State v. Bonham, 93 Wash. 489 , 161 Pac. 377 , L. R. A. 1917D 996; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 , 23 Sup. Ct. 390, 47 L.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 2020
V, § 3. … , Loren Cook Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Gehner
315 Mo. 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1926
of Equalization; that in the assessment thereof the State Board of Equalization was of the opinion that the total value of all of relators’ property did not exceed the value placed by said board upon the tangible property … [State ex rel. v. Lesser, 237 Mo. 318 .] An opinion by Hon. George W. Crowder of the Attorney-General’s office, rendered to the State Tax Commission, is appended to relators brief.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Penrose Investment Co. v. McKelvey
301 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 6, 1923
Louis v. … Louis v.
Cited 22 timesPublished342 Mo. 322 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1938
[Sheffer v. Schmidt, 324 Mo. 1042 , 26 S.W.2d 592 , and cases cited; Waldman v. Skrainka Construction Company, 289 Mo. 622 , 233 S.W. 242 ; Welch v. McGowan, 262 Mo. 709 , 172 S.W. 18 .] … [See, also, Hamra v. Helm (Mo. App.), 281 S.W. 103 ; Patton v. Jewel Tea Co. (Mo. App.), 15 S.W.2d 360 ; Kaley v. Huntley, 333 Mo. 771 , 63 S.W.2d 21 ; Hill v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState v. Division 1287 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway, & Motor Coach Employees
361 S.W.2d 33 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1962
State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75 ; State v. … State Board of Mediation v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna