Case law

St. Louis County v. City of Manchester

360 S.W.2d 638 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 8, 1962

Casper v. Hetlage, Mo., 359 S.W.2d 781 ; Wippler v. Hohn, 341 Mo. 780 , 110 S.W.2d 409, 411 [3,4]; Dallas v. City of St. … In City of Richmond v.

State v. West

202 Mo. 128 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1907

In State v. … [State v. Sneed, 91 Mo. 552 ; State v. Wilson, 86 Mo. 520 .]

Papin v. Hines

23 Mo. 274 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1856

It is apparent that Brazeau asserted before the first board of commissioners three claims, and that the board acted upon them as three distinct claims ; the first for ten arpens in front on the river, extending to the road … , then, in this branch of it, is to be regarded as depending upon the plaintiff’s confirmation under the act of 1886 and the defendant’s patent of 1826, and, as such, it is disposed of by reference to the case of Menard v.

Attaway v. Third National Bank

93 Mo. 485 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

It appears the board •ordered the bond to be issued on the twenty-seventh of November, 1879, and it was then signed by the president, and the board adjourned. … Altee v. Fink, 75 Mo. 100 ; Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 476 ; Bliss v. Matterson, 45 N. Y. 22 ; Tobey v. Robinson, 99 Ill. 223 ; Harrington v. Victoria Graving Dock Co., 47 Law Jour. (N. S.) 594.

Des Moines & Mississippi Levee District No. 1 v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

240 Mo. 614 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 29, 1912

[Crowley v. Copley, 2 La. Ann. 329 ; Sessions v. Crunkilton, 20 Ohio St. 349 ; Yeatman v. Crandall, 11 La. Ann. 220 ; Wallace v. Shelton, 14 La. Ann. 498 ; Bishop v. Marks, 15 La. Ann. 147 ; McGehee v. … Mathis, 21 Ark. 40 ; Jones v. Board Aid., 104 Mass. 461 ; Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; Hagar v. Supervisors, 47 Cal. 231 ; People v. Hagar, 52 Cal. 183 ; People v. Mayor, 4 N. Y. (Com.) 430, 495; Sears v.

Maynard v. Doe Run Lead Co.

305 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1924

[Johnson v. United Rys. Co., 243 Mo. 1 . c. 298, and cases cited; Shelby County v. Bragg, 135 Mo. 1 . c. 298.] … [Hudson v. Cahoon, 193 Mo. 1 . c. 560; Board of Commissioners v. Renshaw, 99 Pac. (Okla.) 638, 1. c. 640, note; Thompson v. Lyons, 281 Mo. 1 . c. 449.]

County of Jackson v. J. H. Fayman & Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

329 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1931

[State v. Roberts, 60 Mo. 402 ; State v. Roberts, 62 Mo. 388 ; Cole Co. v. Dallmeyer, 101 Mo. 57 ; State v. McGonigle, 101 Mo. 353 .] … See also People v. Klokke, 92 Ill. 134 . In State v.

City of St. Louis v. O'Neil Lumber Co.

114 Mo. 74 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1893

The city had no right under the decision of Luthy v. Woods, 6 Mo. App. 67 , and St. Louis v. Keane, 27 Mo. … The moving creditor, who, as in Rieper v.

Person v. Ozark County

82 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

At the time this order was made, the expense of boarding and lodging juries kept together by order of the court in case of felony, was not a proper item of costs, and could not be taxed as such by the court. … Winship v. State Auditor, 57 Mo. 25 ; Bright v. Pike County, 69 Mo. 519 . In 1880, the subject matter of the claim passed upon by the county court, could not be made the basis of a lawful ■demand against the county.

Thierry v. Thierry

298 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1923

V. … Brown and Lindsay, CC., not sitting.

State v. Hill

419 S.W.2d 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1967

This case was tried January 4, 1967, after Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 S.Ct. 1758 , 12 L.Ed.2d 977 , and Miranda v. … Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 , which was held, however, in Stovall v.

Layne v. City of Windsor

442 S.W.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1969

In Fulton v. … Needles v. Kansas City, supra; Grauf v. City of Salem, supra.

Bank of Washington v. McAuliffe

676 S.W.2d 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1984

The circuit court affirmed the Board’s order. … Wayland, v.

State v. Worley

375 S.W.2d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1964

On the trial, the state’s evidence showed that, near 10:00 P.M., on March 10, 1962, Detectives Frederick Abernathy and Isaiah .Brown of the St. … Louis v.

State Ex Rel. Hog Haven Farms v. Pearcy

328 Mo. 560 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 29, 1931

J. 81; Johnson v. Railroad, 227 Mo. 423, 450 , 127 S. W. 63 ; Horine v. Peoples Sewer Co., 200 Mo. App. 233, 237 , 204 S. W. 735 ; and Steinmetz v. Federal Lead Co. (Mo. App.), 176 S. W. 1049 , 1051. … J. 958, 959; Behrmann v. St. Louis, 273 Mo. 578 , 201 S. W. 547 ; State ex rel. v. Sedalia, 241 S. W. 656 , 657 (Mo. App.); and Gibson v. Baton Rouge, 161 La. 637 , 47 A. L. R. 1151, 1152.

State ex inf. Walker ex rel. Goodin v. Cainsville Reorganized School District R-1 of Harrison County

331 S.W.2d 629 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1960

Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. Flint, Mo.App., 303 S.W.2d 200, 206 , citing State ex rel. Corder School Dist. No. R-3 v. Oetting, Mo.App., 245 S.W.2d 157, *631 160 ; State ex inf. Goodman ex rel. Crewdson v. … Kansas City v. North Kansas City, 360 Mo. 374 , 228 S.W.2d 762 .

Wurth Ex Rel. Gershenson v. Wurth

322 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1959

There is this difference: in the Wood case, the minor did not pay her parents anything for her board while in the case at bar, the plaintiff did pay board. … In the case of Zozaski v.

State v. Gross

306 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1924

This motion is based upon the majority opinion in the case of State of Missouri v. Wilson, 265 Mo. 1 . c. 23. … a divided court that the case was essentially a criminal case because the bond was given in a criminal case and therefore the proceedings in scire facias were also criminal in character; but three of the judges, Graves, Brown

State v. Williams

606 S.W.2d 777 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1980

State v. Brown, 554 S.W.2d 574, 578 [7] (Mo.App.1977); State v. Blankenship, 536 S.W.2d 520 , 521—522[7] (Mo.App.1976); State v. Harris, 356 S.W.2d 889, 890-891 [2] (Mo.1962). … See State v. Brown, 528 S.W.2d 503, 506 [7] (Mo.App.1975); State v. Washington, 549 S.W.2d 547 — 549[3] (Mo.App.1977).

State Ex Rel. Kirchner v. McElhinney

302 Mo. 564 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1924

[State v. Bockelman, 240 S. W. 209 , 212.] Since the issuance of our preliminary rule herein the act above referred to has gone into effect. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the Circuit Court of St. … [State ex rel. v.