Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

8.77s

  • Levin v. Hilliard

    266 S.W.2d 573 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

    Co, 126 Mo. 143, 151 [2], 28 S.W. 866, 867 [2]; O’Shaughnessy v. Rogers, Mo.App, 202 S.W.2d 92 , 96 [10, 11], . … Phillips v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dorton v. Hearn

    67 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

    The directors of the school district of the town of Orrick, at a regular meeting of the board, adopted a resolution authorizing the school building put up and furnished under the school law, by a levy of taxes on the people … A coi’poration, it was observed in Blair v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wooldridge v. Bryan

    307 Mo. 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1925

    Adams v. Darby and Barksdale, 28 Mo. 162 , and Myers v. Bank, 72 Mo. App. 4 . These cases are long prior to our Negotiable Instrument Law. [Laws 1906, p. 243, now Arts. I, II and III, Chap. 7, R. … [Napper v. Blank, 54 Mo. l. c. 134.] Under the Negotiable Instrument Law, Chapter 7, Revised Statutes 1919, this matter is covered.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kohner Props., Inc. v. Johnson

    553 S.W.3d 280 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 2018

    V, sec. 10. … See, e.g. , J.A.R. v. D.G.R. , 426 S.W.3d 624 , 629 (Mo. banc 2014) ; Brown v. Brown , 423 S.W.3d 784 , 788 & n.5 (Mo. banc 2014) (per curiam); St. Louis Cty. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Knight

    312 Mo. 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 6, 1926

    The defendant and the other men then got back into the car, put Ben Knight on the running-board, drove on up to their house, and laid Ben Knight on the grass nearby. Defendant and his companions then left town. … [State v. Forshee, 274 S.W. l.c. 422 and cases cited; State v. Cobb, 273 S.W. l.c. 738 and cases cited; State v. Brown, 262 S.W. l.c. 710-11; State v. Sadowski, 256 S.W. l.c. 755; State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

    285 Mo. 621 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1920

    V. … [Aronovitz v. Arky, 219 S.W. 620 ; Petersen v. Transit Co., 199 Mo. 331 ; Mockowik v. Railroad, 196 Mo. 550 ; King v. King, 155 Mo. 406 ; Jones v. Railroad, 178 Mo. 528 ; Barkley v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State ex inf. Latham v. Allen

    361 Mo. 963 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

    State ex rel. v. Holmes, 358 Mo. 1237 , 219 S. W. (2) 650; State ex inf. Burges v. Potter, (Mo.) 191 S. W. 57 . … State v. Morgan, 144 Mo. App. 35, 41-42 , 128 S. W. 839 ; Ex Parte Leach v. McDonald, 231 Mo. 586 , 132 S. W. 1075 ; Armantrout v. Bohon, 349 Mo. 667 , 162 S. W. (2) 867; State ex inf. Kamp v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Sitton v. Norman

    406 S.W.3d 915 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 2013

    In State v. … Similarly, in State v. Sardeson, 174 S.W.3d 598, 601 (Mo.App.2005), and Hudson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Croft v. Morehead

    316 Mo. 1213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1927

    "In Huffman v. … [Brown v. McKown, 265 Mo. 320 .] The plaintiffs, on that ground are entitled to the relief asked.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Curators of the University of Missouri v. McReynolds

    354 Mo. 1199 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1946

    Thompson v. Board of Regents, 305 Mo. 57 , 264 S. W. 698 . Such fees are expressly excepted by statute from those funds required to be placed in the State Treasury. Sec. 13051, R. S. 1939. … E. 567 ; Caldwell v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, etc., 176 La. 825 , 147 So. 5 . To the contrary see Alabama College v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Hughes

    258 Mo. 264 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

    Although it is not required that the testimony of a prosecutrix in a case of this character should be corroborated (State v. Stackhouse, 242 Mo. 444 ), it must, as was well said by Brown, J., in State v. … Brown and Faris, JJ., concur.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • City of Brunswick v. Myers

    357 Mo. 461 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1948

    Typical of the cases cited by appellants on this point are: Baum v. City of St. Louis, 343 Mo, 738, 123 S. W. (2d) 48 ; State ex rel. Asotsky v. Regan, 317 Mo. 1216 , 298 S. W. 747 , and Missouri Electric Power Co. v. … [City of Kansas City v. Corrigan, 18 Mo. App. 206 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • George v. Williamson

    26 Mo. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1858

    (Brown v. Finley, 18 Mo. 375 .) The other judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Leahy v. Leahy

    858 S.W.2d 221 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1993

    The costs of attending Boston University for 1992, including tuition and room and board, is $23,522 or $1,960 per month. … Brown v. Brown, 537 S.W.2d 434, 438 (Mo.App.1976). We hold that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion. Attorney’s Fees Mr.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Stanton v. Thompson

    234 Mo. 7 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 31, 1911

    The propositions announced are well within the reasoning and holding of a line of cases, such as: Cummings v. Brown, 181 Mo. 711 ; Tooker v. Leake, 146 Mo. 419 ; Van Natta v. … J., in Tooker v. Leake, supra, p. 434 ; by Burgess, J., in Young v. Downey, 150 Mo. 328 ; by Marshall, J., in Feurt v. Caster, 174 Mo. 303 ; by Valliant, J., in Kelly v. Murdagh, 184 Mo. 381 ; by Fox, J., in Vincent v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State ex inf. Wright v. Morgan

    268 Mo. 265 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1916

    Bryant, 213 Mo. l. c. 443; Reed v. Colp, 213 Mo. 577 ; Stark v. Zehnder, 204 Mo. 442 ; Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 625 ; State v. Ruck, 194 Mo. 416 ; State v. Revely, 145 Mo. 660 ; State v. … Brown, C., concurs. PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Railey, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur; Bond, J., in result.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. School District v. Dorton

    145 Mo. 304 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1898

    The Auditor of Wayne County v. Benoit, 20 Mich. 180 and State ex rel. v. Blossom, 19 Nev. 312 , are to the same effect. … This case is not like that of Orrick School District v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. St. Louis County v. Kirkpatrick

    426 S.W.2d 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1968

    V, § 29(a)-(g), 1945 Constitution, V.A. M.S., and another ordinance with the same proposal as to magistrate judges. The Board of Election Commissioners refused to place the two proposals on the ballot. … Louis County for a writ of mandamus requiring the Election Board to submit the proposals to the voters.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Glassburn v. Lakeland Development Co.

    340 S.W.2d 641 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960

    McLeod Infirmary, 219 S.C. 174 , 64 S.E.2d 524 , loc. cit. 529-531(5) (6), 24 *645 A.L.R.2d 60 ; Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co., 394 Ill. 94 , 67 N.E.2d 265 , loc. cit. 276(19-25); Gord v. … Iowana Farms Milk Co., 245 Iowa 1 , 60 N.W.2d 820 , loc. cit. 831(10); Knudsen v. Burdett, 67 S.D. 20 , 287 N.W. 673 , loc. cit. 674(2, 3); Textile Mills v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. Brisbin

    26 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1858

    (Brown v. Knox & Bogy, 6 Mo. 306 .) The judgment of the common pleas is affirmed ; the other judges concurring.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.