Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

4.14s

  • St. Louis County v. State Tax Commission

    515 S.W.2d 446 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1974

    Iron County v. … Koplar v. State Tax Commission, [ 321 S.W.2d 686 , l. c. 696, 697 (Mo.)].” Drey v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Linderman v. Carmin

    255 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

    [Wilson v. Board of Education, 63 Mo. l. c. 140; Heether v. Huntsville, 121 Mo. App. 495 .] … J., and Brown, J., concur.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • County of Audrain v. Muir

    297 Mo. 499 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1923

    [Johnson v. Briscoe, 104 Mo. App. 500 , opinion by GOODE, J.; Miller v. Brown, 47 Mo. 504 ; Barr v. Armstrong, 56 Mo. 577 -589; Sauter Adams v. Scrutchfield, 28 Mo. App. 150 ; Reese v. Chilton, 26 Mo. 598 .] III. … Lindsay C., concurs; Brown, C., not sitting.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Little River Drainage District v. Tomlinson

    245 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1912

    “The supervisors organized themselves into a board by electing John H. Himmelberger, president, and A. J. Matthews, secretary. … That precise question was presented to this court, in Banc, in the case of Little Tarkio Drainage District No. 1 v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Gabel-Lockhart Co. v. Gabel

    360 Mo. 518 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1950

    229 S.W.2d 539 (1950) GABEL-LOCKHART CO. et al. v. GABEL. No. 41467. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 10, 1950. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 8, 1950. *540 Thomas L. Brown, Richard K. … This court, in its opinion, quoted the language of the Supreme Court of the United States in Eyster v. Centennial Board of Finance, 94 U.S. 500 , 24 L.Ed. 188 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Bush v. State Highway Commission

    329 Mo. 843 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1932

    The Kanawha Board, 19 W. Va. 257 , which we later will examine. Suffice it for the present to say that a Virginia case (Dunningtons v. … [Tompkins v. Kanawha Board, 19 W. Va. l.c. 263].

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Best v. Jones

    155 Mo. 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1900

    [McKenzie v. Donnell, 151 Mo. l. c. 448.] *574 II. … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. l. c. 136; State ex rel. v. McGrath, 91 Mo. 386 .]

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    448 S.W.2d 892 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 1970

    State v. Preston, Mo., 184 S.W.2d 1015 ; State v. Foster, Mo., 349 S. *894 W.2d 922 . … State v. Thompson, Mo., 396 S.W.2d 697 ; United States v. Keogh, 2 Cir., 391 F.2d 138 ; Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 4 Cir., 331 F.2d 842 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Holton v. Towner

    81 Mo. 360 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

    Fugate v. Pierce, 49 Mo. 441 . … Vide Wilcoxon v. Osborn, 77 Mo. 621 ; Brown v. Brown, 45 Mo. 412 . We understand the deed and judgment to have been excluded by the court below, on the ground that the judgment was a nullity.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Keeble

    427 S.W.2d 404 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1968

    Such a rule is dictated as a result of the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708 , 81 S.Ct. 895 , 6 L.Ed.2d 39 , and Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 . … In the subsequent case of Lane v. Brown, supra, 372 U.S. 1 . c. 484, 83 S.Ct. 1 . c. 773, the court said: “In Smith v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Empire District Electric Co. v. Public Service Commission

    339 Mo. 1188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936

    Railways Co. v. Public Service Commission, 223 N. Y. 373 , 119 N. E. 848 ; Havre de Grace & Perryville Bridge Co. v. Towers, 132 Md. 16 , 103 Atl. 319 .] … In Board of Public Utility Comrs. v. New York Telephone Company, 271 U. S. 23 , 70 L.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • American Polled Hereford Ass'n v. City of Kansas City

    626 S.W.2d 237 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 1982

    In Seibert v. … Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 666 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 [1081], 16 L.Ed.2d 169 .

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis v. Chas. F. Querl Lumber Co.

    277 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 4, 1919

    Louis v. Lawton, 189 Mo. 475 ; Richardson v. Schuyler Co. Assn., 156 Mo. 407 ; Moran v. Stewart, 246 Mo. 463 .] … Louis v. Lawton, supra) and finding, and upon final judgment being rendered, to have appealed for errors occurring upon the hearing of the. special taxpayers’ exceptions at which the point ivas ruled against it.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pietzuk v. Kansas City Railways Co.

    289 Mo. 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1921

    [White v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 178 S. W. l. c. 84; Althoff v. Transit Co., 204 Mo. 166 ; State v. Johnson, 255 Mo. 281 ; Stegman v. Berryhill, 72 Mo. 307 .] … V.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Reals v. Courson

    349 Mo. 1193 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1942

    Gentry v. … Gentry v.

    Overruled in part by Walters v. City of St. Louis, 364 Mo. 56 (1953)Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Maynard v. Doe Run Lead Co.

    305 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1924

    [Johnson v. United Rys. Co., 243 Mo. 1 . c. 298, and cases cited; Shelby County v. Bragg, 135 Mo. 1 . c. 298.] … [Hudson v. Cahoon, 193 Mo. 1 . c. 560; Board of Commissioners v. Renshaw, 99 Pac. (Okla.) 638, 1. c. 640, note; Thompson v. Lyons, 281 Mo. 1 . c. 449.]

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Glass v. First National Bank of St. Louis, N.A.

    186 S.W.3d 766 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2005

    Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 996 S.W.2d 47, 51 (Mo. banc 1999); Wright v. Mo. Dept. of Social Services, 25 S.W.3d 525, 528 (Mo.App.2000). The constitutional issue must be real and substantial, not merely colorable. … WHITE, C.J., WOLFF, STITH and PRICE, JJ., and BROWN, Sp.J., concur. LIMBAUGH and RUSSELL, JJ., not participating.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Keystone Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. McDonnell

    426 S.W.2d 11 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1968

    The cases we shall thus consider are United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, 359 Pa. 195 , 58 A.2d 833 ; North Side Laundry Co. v. … Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 366 Pa. 636 , 79 A.2d 419 , and Messenger Publishing Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, 183 Pa.Super. 407 , 132 A.2d 768 .

    Disagreed with by State v. Jacksonville Port Authority, 305 So. 2d 166 (1974)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State v. Brannan

    206 Mo. 636 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1907

    In State v. … In State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cantley v. Little River Drainage District

    318 Mo. 1120 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 4, 1928

    [McCormick v. Bank, 304 Mo. l. c. 288-9; Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Poultry & Game Co., 287 Mo. l. c. 407; Millinery Co. v. Trust Co., 251 Mo. 579 ; National Bank of Commerce v. Francis, 296 Mo. l. c. 395 and 196.] … [Erb v. Yoerg, 64 Minn. l. c. 465; Re Assignment of Pendleton Hardware Co., 24 Ore. l. c. 332; Whitehead v. Am. L. & B. Co., 70 N. J. Eq. 585; *1134 Iowa Drug Co. v. Souers, 139 Iowa, l. c. 79, 80; Albin Company v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.