Case law

City of Springfield v. Goff

918 S.W.2d 786 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1996

Sprague v. City of St. … of the board of health, require the mayor to name and the council to approve two members of the board, set terms and compensation for board members, pre *789 scribe duties of board members, and create the office of plumbing

Community Memorial Hospital v. City of Moberly

422 S.W.2d 290 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1967

Midwest Bible & Missionary Inst. v. … Alexian Brothers’ Hospital v.

State v. Berkowitz

325 Mo. 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 1930

[State v. Ruckman, 253 Mo. 487 , 161 S. W. 705 ; State v. Morney, 196 Mo. 43 , 93 S. W. 1117 ; State v. Myer, 259 Mo. 306 , 168 S. W. 717 ; State v. Sheline (Mo. Sup.), 225 S. W. 673 ; State v. Jackson (Mo. … The instruction' here criticised is in the identical language of alibi instructions specifically approved in State v. Davis, 186 Mo. 533 , 85 S. W. 354 ; State v. Brown, 247 Mo. 715 , 153 S. W. 1027 , and State v.

Haydel v. Hurck

72 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

The case of Lee v. Brown, 4 Ves. Ch. 362, is relied on as maintaining a,, contrary doctrine, but the cases are not alike. In that case the testatrix gave to her brothers, Wm. *258 and Ed. … Brown, the sum of £200 upon trust, to place the same out at interest during the minority of her nephew, John Lee, and to apply the interest and produce thereof for and toward the maintenance and education of said nephew,

State v. Morris

476 S.W.2d 485 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1971

Furthermore, the form *490 of the instruction submitting this information to the jury should be as set forth in State v. Brown, Mo., 443 S.W.2d 80S, 809. … What was said in State v.

O'Connor v. Current River Railroad

111 Mo. 185 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1892

Jones v. Hurst, 67 Mo. 568 . The direct point has not since been decided in this court, but has twice arisen in the Kansas City court of appeals in Griswold v. Railroad, 18 Mo. App. 52 , and Brown v. Railroad, 36 Mo. … The great weight of authority is in this direction. 2 Jones on Liens, secs. 1493-4; Davis v. Bilsland, 18 Wall. 659 ; Brown v. Harper, 4 Ore. 89 ; First Nat. Bank v. Day, 52 Iowa, 680 ; Brown v.

Valle v. Ziegler

84 Mo. 214 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Saline County Court, 51 Mo. 350 ; Newmeyer v. M. & M. R. R. Co., 52 Mo. 81 ; Overall v. Ruenzi, 67 Mo. 203 ; Rubey v. Shain, 54 Mo. 207 ; Ranney v. Bader, 67 Mo. 476 ; Ewing v. Board of Education, 72 Mo. 436 . … Louis v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 40 Mo. 581 ; State on pet. of Taylor v. St. Louis County Court, 47 Mo. 594 ; State ex rel. v. Howard County Court, 69 Mo. 454 .

Vaile v. City of Independence

116 Mo. 333 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1893

Rowland v. Gallatin, 75 Mo. 134 , and cases cited; Worley v. Inhabitants, 88 Mo. 106 . The evidence to support the first count was, therefore, properly held insufficient on demurrer. … Under the ruling of this *338 court in Cross v. City of Kansas, 90 Mo. 13 , all who signed the petition were estopped to claim damages from the city, for doing that which they asked to have done.

Reese v. Illinois Terminal Railroad Company

273 S.W.2d 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1954

Bell for the Railroad Retirement Board; and there was evidence that plaintiff had been retired by the Board, and was receiving retirement pay. … It is doubtful that the Board’s findings (or testimony of the Board’s findings) would have been admissible; and, if admitted into evidence, the fact of such a classification by the Board, if so, would not have been merely

Committee for Educational Equality v. State

878 S.W.2d 446 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 21, 1994

Fugel v. Becker, 2 S.W.2d at 746. … See Brown v. Board. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1984).

Pittman v. Scullin Steel Co.

289 S.W.2d 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1956

V, § 3 (1945), V.A.M.S. … The birth certificate issued by the Mississippi State Board of Health, Bureau of Vital Statistics, contained the answer “No” to the question, “Is this a legitimate child?”

Missouri Valley College v. Guthrie

263 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1914

The validity of this union has been upheld by this court in the case of Hayes v. … J., and Woodson, Laris, and Brown, JJ., concur; Rotó, J., concurs in result; Graves, J., dissents.

State v. Adcox

312 Mo. 55 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1925

In case of State v. … [See State v. Faris, 229 S. W. l. c. 1102.]

St. Louis County v. State Tax Commission

515 S.W.2d 446 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1974

Iron County v. … Koplar v. State Tax Commission, [ 321 S.W.2d 686 , l. c. 696, 697 (Mo.)].” Drey v.

State to Use of Divine v. Collier

301 Mo. 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1923

shall be corrected in red ink in accordance with the changes made by the board of equalization, and so certified by said board, and then returned to the board of aldermen: Provided, that in cities which do not elect an assessor … Pearson, 273 *Page 79 Mo. l.c. 78, 199 S.W. l.c. 943-4; State ex rel. v. Shepherd, 218 Mo. 656 -7.

Union National Bank v. State National Bank

155 Mo. 95 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1900

In Osburn v. … Bank v. Shoemaker, 68 Mo. App. 592 .

Kochtitzky v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railroad

236 Mo. 94 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1911

Board of Supervisors, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 437; Mound City Land and Stock Company v. Miller, supra; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345 .] … S. 561 ; State ex rel. v. Board of County Commissioners, 87 Minn. l. c. 336; Irrigation District v. Williams, 76 Cal. l. c. 367.] V.

State Ex Rel. McNary v. Stussie

518 S.W.2d 630 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 29, 1974

Peck Co. v. Brown, 34 Mo. 1189 , 105 S.W.2d 909 (1937); Vol. I, Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations (8th ed.), p. 316. … State Board of Mediation v. Pigg, 362 Mo. 798 , 244 S.W.2d 75, 79 (1951); Tietjens v. City of St. Louis, 359 Mo. 439 , 222 S.W.2d 70, 71-72 (1949). Intervenor’s motion for clarification is overruled. 1 .

Linderman v. Carmin

255 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1914

[Wilson v. Board of Education, 63 Mo. l. c. 140; Heether v. Huntsville, 121 Mo. App. 495 .] … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State Ex Rel. People's Motorbus Co. v. Blaine

332 Mo. 582 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1933

The other three cases, Sheip Co. v. Amos, Texas Co. v. Brown, and Foster & Creighton Co. v. … Texas Co. v. Brown, and Foster & Creighton Co. v. Graham, supra.