Case law

Coleman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

273 Mo. 620 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 4, 1918

Louis Public Schools v. Risley, 28 Mo. L. c. 419; Musser v. Johnson, 42 Mo. l. c. 79; City of Kansas v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 185 ; Koehler v. Iron Co., 67 U. S. l. c. 717; Pac. St. Bk. v. Coats, 205 Fed. 621 ; Chandler v. … The consent of the directors separately obtained and not given in a board meeting is not equivalent to formal action of the board. [Brinkerhoff Zinc Co. v. Boyd, 192 Mo. l. c. 613; Hill v.

Plummer v. Roberts

315 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1926

L. p. 290, sec. 12; Gates v. Seibert, 157 Mo. 254 ; Gray v. Whittemore, 192 Mass. 367 , 78 N. E. 422 ; Landers Inv. Co. v. Brown, 300 Mo. 348 .] … [Fuller v. Winthrop, 3 Allen, 51 ; Harris v. Fly, 7 Paige, 421 ; Marsh v. Wheeler, 2 Edw. Ch. 163 ; 1 Jarm. 756-63.]” In Knight v. Pottgieser, 52 N.

Thierry v. Thierry

298 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1923

V. … Brown and Lindsay, CC., not sitting.

Craig v. Thompson

244 S.W.2d 37 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

"; that he worked on the freight extra board out of defendant's 23rd Street station in St. … bottom of the board"; that such board was "to protect the service * * * see that the trains went out"; that he then "resided at the (St.

Nichols v. Blake

395 S.W.2d 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1965

See generally: Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553 ; Hufft v. Kuhn, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 552 ; Steuernagel v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 361 Mo. 1066 , 238 S.W.2d 426 ; Spica v. McDonald, Mo., 334 S.W.2d 365 ; Glore v. … It has been said that the appellate court should interfere only when the verdict is “grossly and shockingly inadequate” (Brown, supra), or when it appears to have been the result of “passion and prejudice” Brown, Hufft, Pinkston

Pacific Mutual Insurance v. Guse

49 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1872

In Thomas v. … (Bangs v. Gray, 2 Kern. 477; Herkimer County Mutual Ins. Co. v. Fuller, 14 Barb. 373 ; In re Bangs, 15 Barb. 264 ; Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Gray, 279 ; Long Point Ins. Co. v. Houghton, 6 Gray, 77 ; Savage v.

State v. Holder

335 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

sufficient to charge an offense under this section. [1] It is a fundamental rule of law that statutes creating felonies are to be strictly construed and will not be enlarged by implication. [59 C.J. 1113, sec. 660; State v. … Lloyd, 7 S.W.2d 344 , l.c. 346 (4-6), 320 Mo. 236 ; State v. Dishman, 334 Mo. 874 , 68 S.W.2d 797 .] *Page 178 [2] The purpose of the statute Section 4091 seems to us to be plain.

Schurtz v. Cushing

347 Mo. 113 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1941

While the cause was so pending, Judge Brown died. Thereafter the cause was submitted to Judge W.F. Woodruff on a transcript of the proceedings before Judge Brown. … [Estes v. Reynolds, 75 Mo. 563 , l.c. 565. See also Robinson v. Siple et al., 129 Mo. 208 , l.c. 220, 31 S.W. 788 ; Sellner v. Meyer (Mo. App.), 240 S.W. 247 ; Ebel v. Roller et al. (Mo.

Town of Canton v. Bank of Lewis County

338 Mo. 817 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1936

[McShane v. School District, 70 Mo. App. 624 ; Saleno v. … Joseph v. Security Bank of St.

Sly v. Union Depot Railroad

134 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 16, 1896

That he was not wholly absolved from the exercise of care in boarding the car while it was moving at a rate of speed of from three to seven miles per hour, is, we think, too clear to admit of dispute. In Ridenhour v. … What has been said in no way conflicts with Schepers v. Railroad, 126 Mo. 665 , but is in perfect harmony with that case.

Attaway v. Third National Bank

93 Mo. 485 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

It appears the board •ordered the bond to be issued on the twenty-seventh of November, 1879, and it was then signed by the president, and the board adjourned. … Altee v. Fink, 75 Mo. 100 ; Bent v. Priest, 86 Mo. 476 ; Bliss v. Matterson, 45 N. Y. 22 ; Tobey v. Robinson, 99 Ill. 223 ; Harrington v. Victoria Graving Dock Co., 47 Law Jour. (N. S.) 594.

State Ex Rel. Saline County v. Price

296 Mo. 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1922

In two of those years the amount received for board was greater than the amount retained as his compensation. … This court in Callaway County v.

State v. Hubbard

351 Mo. 143 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 7, 1943

He left there about 10:30 and went to his cousin's, Arnecia Brown's, on Barry Street and stayed there for late afternoon dinner and Brown took him home about 5:00 o'clock. … Aside from the Shafer case the McGinnis case was cited in State v. Davis, 186 Mo. 533 , 539, 85 S.W. 354, 356 ; State v. Barton, 214 Mo. 316 , 113 S.W. 1111 ; State v. Brown, 247 Mo. 715 , 153 S.W. 1027 , and State v.

Niman v. Plaza House, Inc.

471 S.W.2d 207 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

In any event, we are not here concerned with an unnecessary deviation from a required MAI instruction, Rule 70.01(b), V.A.M.R., Brown v. St. … As was said in Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Empire District Electric Co. v. Public Service Commission

339 Mo. 1188 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1936

Railways Co. v. Public Service Commission, 223 N. Y. 373 , 119 N. E. 848 ; Havre de Grace & Perryville Bridge Co. v. Towers, 132 Md. 16 , 103 Atl. 319 .] … In Board of Public Utility Comrs. v. New York Telephone Company, 271 U. S. 23 , 70 L.

Pietzuk v. Kansas City Railways Co.

289 Mo. 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1921

[White v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 178 S. W. l. c. 84; Althoff v. Transit Co., 204 Mo. 166 ; State v. Johnson, 255 Mo. 281 ; Stegman v. Berryhill, 72 Mo. 307 .] … V.

Reals v. Courson

349 Mo. 1193 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1942

Gentry v. … Gentry v.

Person v. Ozark County

82 Mo. 491 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

At the time this order was made, the expense of boarding and lodging juries kept together by order of the court in case of felony, was not a proper item of costs, and could not be taxed as such by the court. … Winship v. State Auditor, 57 Mo. 25 ; Bright v. Pike County, 69 Mo. 519 . In 1880, the subject matter of the claim passed upon by the county court, could not be made the basis of a lawful ■demand against the county.

State ex rel. Ryan W. Amorine, Relator v. The Honorable Kelly Wayne Parker

490 S.W.3d 372 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 2016

On January 8, 2015, the Board of Probation and Parole filed a “Case Summary Report” and a “Field Violation Report.” … Dotson v. Holden, 416 S.W.3d 821, 823 (Mo. App.

State Ex Rel. People's Motorbus Co. v. Blaine

332 Mo. 582 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1933

The other three cases, Sheip Co. v. Amos, Texas Co. v. Brown, and Foster & Creighton Co. v. … Texas Co. v. Brown, and Foster & Creighton Co. v. Graham, supra.