Case law

State ex rel. Acom v. Hamlet

363 Mo. 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1952

McCain v. Acorn, 236 S.W. (2d) 749 . … No. 34, Lincoln County v. Begeman, 221 Mo.

General Motors Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Division of the Council on Human Relations of St. Louis

574 S.W.2d 394 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1978

V, § 3. Respondent cites Kelch v. Kelch, 450 S.W.2d 202 (Mo.1970), transferred 462 S.W.2d 161 (Mo.App.1970), and also Kansas City v. … Phelps v. McQueen, 296 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. banc 1956); Stewart v. Brown, 546 S.W.2d 204 (Mo.App.1977).

Hamilton v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

248 Mo. 78 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913

BROWN, C. This is a suit by the plaintiff, a minor child of Charles M. … The plaintiff develops this theory apparently from a remark of this court in McNamara v.

Landau v. Pac. Mutl. Life Insurance Co.

305 Mo. 542 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1924

There is a running board along the right-hand side of the ear for passengers to step on in boarding the car, and handholds on the ends of the seats to assist the passenger in lifting himself from the running board to the … [Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co., 290 Mo. 455 ; Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co. (second appeal), 299 Mo. 426 .] II.

State ex rel. Lane v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

110 Mo. 265 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1892

State ex rel. v. Railroad, 87 *272 Mo. 236 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 136 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 97 Mo. 296 . II. … Walker v. St. Louis, 15 Mo. 563 ; Westlake & Button v. St. Louis, 77 Mo. 47 . III.

Boyd v. Paul

125 Mo. 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1894

State ex rel. v. Hoshaw, 98 Mo. 358 and cases cited; Tracy v. Iron Works Co., 104 Mo. 103 , and cases cited; Jones v. Shepley, 90 Mo. 307 , and cases cited. … Browne on the Statute of Frauds [4 Ed.], sec. 231, and cases cited.

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

441 S.W.2d 699 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1969

The assessor testified that he was a member of the board of equalization which adjusted the Greyhound assessment. He was not examined as to the basis for the board’s action. … Marye v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 127 U.S. 117, 123-124 , 8 S.Ct. 1037 , 32 L.Ed. 94 ; Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment, 347 U.S. 590, 597-598 , 74 S.Ct. 757 , 98 L.Ed. 967 .

Norman's Land & Manufacturing Co. v. Hunter

270 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 20, 1917

Appellant relies upon decisions (Ryan v. Carr, 46 Mo. l. c. 486; Allen v. Moss, 27 Mo. l. c. 364; Dunlap v. Henry, 76 Mo. l. c. 108; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Cabell v. … Brown, 197 Mo. l. c. 48, 49. It is suggested what was there said is obiter. The court both applied the doctrine and held Brown had not put himsélf in position to raise the question.

State Ex Rel. Sekyra v. Schmoll

313 Mo. 693 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1926

Greene Co. v. Gideon, 277 Mo. 361 .] … [State ex rel. v. Railroad, 262 Mo. 720 ; Johnston v. Reagan, 265 Mo. l. c. 435.]

State v. Harris

870 S.W.2d 798 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 22, 1994

Appellant claims that although Ben Brown’s name was listed on the police report, trial counsel failed to contact Brown or call him as a witness at trial. … Brown’s identity and that he was a possible witness. Counsel cannot be faulted for failing to investigate and call Brown. The motion court’s conclusion is not clearly erroneous. 5.

Richardson v. McReynolds

114 Mo. 641 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1893

Buchanan v. School District, 25 Mo. App. 85 . … Section 8008, Revised Statutes, 1889, providing for the call of special school meetings, expressly provides that such meeting shall not be called by the school board until a petition shall be presented to said board signed

Coleman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

273 Mo. 620 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 4, 1918

Louis Public Schools v. Risley, 28 Mo. L. c. 419; Musser v. Johnson, 42 Mo. l. c. 79; City of Kansas v. Railroad, 77 Mo. 185 ; Koehler v. Iron Co., 67 U. S. l. c. 717; Pac. St. Bk. v. Coats, 205 Fed. 621 ; Chandler v. … The consent of the directors separately obtained and not given in a board meeting is not equivalent to formal action of the board. [Brinkerhoff Zinc Co. v. Boyd, 192 Mo. l. c. 613; Hill v.

Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.

140 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1897

McDermott v. Barnum, 19 Mo. 204 ; Craighead v. Wells, 21 Mo. 404 ; Blair v. Corby, 29 Mo. 480 ; Gavisk v. Railroad, 49 Mo. 274 ; Golson v. Ebert, 52 Mo. 260 ; Anderson v. Shockley, 82 Mo. 250 ; Father Matthew Society v. … Hamby v. Brasher, 51 Mo. 439 ; Porter v. Harrison, 52 Mo. 524 ; Meyers v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 223 .

Plummer v. Roberts

315 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1926

L. p. 290, sec. 12; Gates v. Seibert, 157 Mo. 254 ; Gray v. Whittemore, 192 Mass. 367 , 78 N. E. 422 ; Landers Inv. Co. v. Brown, 300 Mo. 348 .] … [Fuller v. Winthrop, 3 Allen, 51 ; Harris v. Fly, 7 Paige, 421 ; Marsh v. Wheeler, 2 Edw. Ch. 163 ; 1 Jarm. 756-63.]” In Knight v. Pottgieser, 52 N.

Eitelgeorge v. Mutual House Building Ass'n

69 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

Powers v. Kueckhoff, 41 Mo. 425 ; Koehring v. Muemminghoff, 61 Mo. 403 ; Hill on Trustees, 746, 748. … Ev., §§ 27, 207; Chouteau et al., v. Goddin et al., 39 Mo. 250 .

Craig v. Thompson

244 S.W.2d 37 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

"; that he worked on the freight extra board out of defendant's 23rd Street station in St. … bottom of the board"; that such board was "to protect the service * * * see that the trains went out"; that he then "resided at the (St.

Nichols v. Blake

395 S.W.2d 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1965

See generally: Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553 ; Hufft v. Kuhn, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 552 ; Steuernagel v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 361 Mo. 1066 , 238 S.W.2d 426 ; Spica v. McDonald, Mo., 334 S.W.2d 365 ; Glore v. … It has been said that the appellate court should interfere only when the verdict is “grossly and shockingly inadequate” (Brown, supra), or when it appears to have been the result of “passion and prejudice” Brown, Hufft, Pinkston

Pacific Mutual Insurance v. Guse

49 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1872

In Thomas v. … (Bangs v. Gray, 2 Kern. 477; Herkimer County Mutual Ins. Co. v. Fuller, 14 Barb. 373 ; In re Bangs, 15 Barb. 264 ; Atlantic Ins. Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Gray, 279 ; Long Point Ins. Co. v. Houghton, 6 Gray, 77 ; Savage v.

State v. Holder

335 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

sufficient to charge an offense under this section. [1] It is a fundamental rule of law that statutes creating felonies are to be strictly construed and will not be enlarged by implication. [59 C.J. 1113, sec. 660; State v. … Lloyd, 7 S.W.2d 344 , l.c. 346 (4-6), 320 Mo. 236 ; State v. Dishman, 334 Mo. 874 , 68 S.W.2d 797 .] *Page 178 [2] The purpose of the statute Section 4091 seems to us to be plain.

Schurtz v. Cushing

347 Mo. 113 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1941

While the cause was so pending, Judge Brown died. Thereafter the cause was submitted to Judge W.F. Woodruff on a transcript of the proceedings before Judge Brown. … [Estes v. Reynolds, 75 Mo. 563 , l.c. 565. See also Robinson v. Siple et al., 129 Mo. 208 , l.c. 220, 31 S.W. 788 ; Sellner v. Meyer (Mo. App.), 240 S.W. 247 ; Ebel v. Roller et al. (Mo.