Case law

Bauer v. TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DIST.

111 S.W.3d 405 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 2003

BAUER, Respondent, v. TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant, The Board of Education of The City of St. Louis, et al., Appellants. No. SC 84807. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. … State v. Tisius, 92 S.W.3d 751, 770 (Mo. banc 2002); Rundquist v. Director of Revenue, 62 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Mo.App.2001); Kersting v. Director of Revenue, 792 S.W.2d 651, 652-53 (Mo.App.1990).

Huttegger v. Davis

599 S.W.2d 506 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1980

See Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate Co., supra. Or, as stated, Latta v. … See also Wilson v. Murch, 354 S.W.2d 332 (Mo.App.1962); Kreutz v. Wolff, 560 S.W.2d 271 (Mo.App.1977); Yeager v. Wittels, 517 S.W.2d 457 (Mo.App.1974).

Brinkerhoff-Farris Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co.

118 Mo. 447 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1893

of directors and the purchase thereof had been refused by each and every member of the board. … And on July 1, 1884, the board adopted the following by-law: , “Article 10, section 1.

State Ex Rel. Shepley v. Gamble

365 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1955

V, in part, as follows: ! … Hart v. Board of Education of Nevada School District, 299 Mo. 36 , 252 S.W. 441, 442 . We rule this assignment against the relator and hold that the ballot provided was a legal, proper and valid one.

Schufeldt v. Smith

139 Mo. 367 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1897

The Georgia Company v. Castleberry, 43 Ga. 188 ; McLellan v. Detroit File Works, 56 Mich. 583 . … Holt v. Dollarhide, 61 Mo. 433 ; Flanagan v. Hutchinson, *378 47 Mo. 237 .

Nugent v. Hamilton & Son, Inc.

417 S.W.2d 939 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1967

Slight deviations and inconsequential departures from MAI may be countenanced in some circumstances see Johnson v. … The instructions in Harrison v.

Taylor v. City of Carondelet

22 Mo. 105 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1855

The law-making power, in fact, made the board of trustees a miniature general gssembly, and gave their ordinances, on this subject, the force of laws passed by the legislature of the state. … (Kirk v. Nowil, 1 T. R. 118; Adley v. Reeves, 2 M. & Sel. 60.) They may impose a forfeiture for a violation of a by-law, but it can only be collected by an action of debt, unless the distress and sale are given.

State Ex Rel. Saline County v. Price

296 Mo. 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1922

In two of those years the amount received for board was greater than the amount retained as his compensation. … This court in Callaway County v.

State Ex Rel. Kent v. Olenhouse

324 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1929

While the statute refers to the board both as “the tOAvnship board” and as “the board of directors,” a reading of all the statutes touching this question convinces us that only one board was created and that AAras the board … Our conclusion is that the Legislature used the words “township board” and “board of directors” interchangeably. The statute creates only one board and that is the board of directors.

State ex rel. American Automobile Insurance v. Schramm

271 Mo. 223 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1917

In a general sense this is true (State ex rel. v. … In Farmers’ Bank v. Minnegsota 232 U.

Gate City Building & Loan Ass'n v. National Bank of Commerce

126 Mo. 82 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1894

Famous, etc., Co. v. Crosswhite, 124 Mo. 34 . … Benton v. Bank, 122 Mo. 332 ; Oddie v. Bank, 45 N. Y. 735 ; 2 Morse on Banks and Banking [3 Ed.], sec. 451.

Jones v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

240 Mo. 200 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1912

[Brown v. Globe Co., 213 Mo. 611 ; Morgan v. Mulhall, 214 Mo. 451 .] III. … [Brown v. Globe Printing Co., 213 Mo. 611 ; Brown v. Knapp, 213 Mo. 655 ; Boogher v. Knapp, 97 Mo. 122 ; Folkard on Law of Slander and Libel (7 Ed.), 108; Odgers on Libel and Slander (4 Ed.), 290.]

Loth v. City of St. Louis

257 Mo. 399 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

These propositions were fully presented by same counsel here in the case of Gilsonite Co. v. St. … Louis Fair Association, supra; Corrigan v. Kansas City, 211 Mo. 608 ; and in the case at bar.

Brady v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

361 Mo. 148 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

Plaintiff boarded one of defendant’s eastbound Tower Grove busses at Shenandoah and 39th streets about 11:00 a. m. Sunday, August 8, 1948. She sat in the second or third seat from the front on the right side of the bus. … W. 92, 105 (12, e); Chambers v. United States, 237 F. 513, 520 [8]; Brown v. New York Indemnity Co., 39 F. 2d 443, 444 [3]; 66 C. J. S. p. 484, § 201, p. 491, § 201, h, (2) ; 23 C. J.

Woodson v. Skinner

22 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1855

This act changed the former charters and vested the legislative power in a city council, consisting of a board of aldermen and a board of delegates. … The case of Swartz v. Page, ( 13 Mo. 610 ,) certainly goes on the idea that the city had power to convey a fee simple title to the commons. In the case of DuBois v. Bramell, (4 How. U. S.

State Ex Rel. McAllister v. Cupples Station Light, Heat & Power Co.

283 Mo. 115 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1920

S. 582 ; Harlan, J., in Webster v. Luther, 163 U. S. 342 ; Edwards’ Lessee v. Darby, 12 Wheat. 210 ; Logan v. Davis, 233 U. S, 613, l. c. 627; La Roque v. United States, 239 U. S. 62 , l. c. 64; State ex inf. v. … Joseph v. Railroad, 268 Mo. 47 ; Town of Mount Vallo v. School District, 268 Mo. 217 ; Simpson v. Stoddard County, 173 Mo. 421 ; Ex rel. v. Light and Development Co., 246 Mo. l. c. 642.]

Hull v. Baumann

345 Mo. 159 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 21, 1939

[See, also, Brown v. State, 323 Mo. 138 , 19 S. W. (2d) 12 ; State ex rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Sewer Dist. v. Smith, 337 Mo. 855 , 87 S. W. (2d) 147 .] … Zoological Board v. St. Louis, 318 Mo. 910 , 1 S. W. (2d) 1021 ; State ex rel. Hollaway v. Knight, 323 Mo. 1241 , 21 S. W. (2d) 767 ; State ex rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Dist. v. Smith, supra; State ex rel. Crain v.

O'NEAL v. Mavrakos Candy Co.

364 Mo. 467 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1953

(Also citing 12 C.J.S. 170, Sec. 78; Kline v. St. Louis Terminal R. Assn., (Mo. App.), 268 S. W. 660 ; Hoyt v. Buder, 318 Mo. 1155 , 6 S. W. (2d) 947 ; Muench v. Southside National Bank, (Mo. Sup.), 251 S. W. (2d) 1 .) … (See Murphy v. Knights of Columbus Building Co., 155 Mo. App. 649 , 135 S. W. 446 .)

State Ex Rel. State Auditor v. Truman

319 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1928

Zevely v. Hackmann, 300 Mo. 59 , it was held that the secretary of the State Board of Equalization was a public officer, although he was not a member of the board. … In United States v.

State Ex Rel. Fawkes v. Bland

357 Mo. 634 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1948

W. (2d) 1237 (1); Sharpe v. Sharpe, 134 Mo. App. 278 , 114 S. W. 584 . 6 Dorrance v. Dorrance, 257 Mo. (banc) 317, 326, 165 S. W. 783, 786 (2); Nolker v. Nolker (Mo. banc), 257 S. W. 798 , 803(5. 6); Weisheyer v. … Weisheyer v. Haid (Mo. Div. 2), 26 S. W. (2d) 939 ; Brown v. Brown (Mo. App.), 176; S. W. (2d) 296, 297; State ex rel, Elliott v. James (Mo. App.), 194 S. W. (2d) 700, 702-3 (2-4),