Case law

State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. Louis

145 Mo. 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

Louis, and its board of public improvements, and the members of the board, *556 viz.: Robert E. McMath, president of said board, and M. L. Holman, water commissioner; Branch H. Colby, sewer commissioner; Franklin L. … Russell v. Place, 94 U. S. 606 ; Bissell v. Spring Valley, 124 U. S. 225 ; Nesbit v. Riverside, 144 U. S. 610 .

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Russell

129 S.W.3d 867 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 2004

Beggs v. Dormiré, 91 S.W.3d 605 (Mo. banc 2002). … or the board and to its supervision; ... ”.

Johnson v. United Railways Co.

247 Mo. 326 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1912

Railroad v. … Ferriss, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur; Valliant, G. J., and Woodson, J., dissent in separate opinions; Graves, J., dissents.

Cook v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters

309 S.W.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1958

Walsh v. National Mediation Board, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 179 F.2d 446 ; Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F; Ry., 7 Cir., 171 F.2d 594 , certiorari denied Shepherd v. Hunter, 337 U.S. 916 , 69 S.Ct. 1157 , 93 L.Ed. 1726 . … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; United Transp. Serv. Employees of America, C. I. O., ex rel. Walsh v.

Smith v. Shell

82 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

Story on Sales, § 269; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 384; Benjamin on Sales, §§ 249, 250; Hilliard on Sales, pp. 624, 629; 1 Greenleaf’s Ev., § 268. … Boardman v. Spooner, 13 Allen 359 .

Wells v. Pressy

105 Mo. 164 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Schwartz v. Page, 13 Mo. 603 ; Reilley v. Chouquette, 18 Mo. 220 ; Tigh v. Chouquette, 21 Mo. 233 ; Chouquette v. Barada, 33 Mo. 249 . … Smith v. Madison, 67 Mo. 694 ; Crispen v. Hannavan, 72 Mo. 548 ; Wilson v. Albert, 89 Mo. 537 ; Hoge v. Hubb, 94 Mo. 489 . We do not think.the legislature by the charter of the city of St.

State v. Shipman

354 Mo. 265 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 4, 1945

In the recent case of State v. Pinski, (Mo.), 163 S. … State v. Breeden (Mo.), 180 S. W. (2d) 684 .

State Ex Rel. Compton v. Buder

308 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1925

Louis, herein referred to as “board.” *258 In response to our writ theretofore issued, a return was filed incorporating a stipulated record of the proceeding's before the board. … The quotation from Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co., 255 U. S. 180, 210 , 65 L.

State ex rel. Mahan v. Merchants Bank

160 Mo. 640 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1901

[State ex rel. v. Cunningham, 153 Mo. 642 .] … [State v. Phillips, supra; State ex rel. v. Cunningham, supra.]

State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

352 Mo. 715 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1944

State v. Shelby, *Page 724 333 Mo. 1036 , 64 S.W.2d 269 , l.c. 271. … Co. v. Thornton, 152 Mo. 570 , l.c. 575, 54 S.W. 445 .

Union National Bank v. Hunt

76 Mo. 439 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1882

Neither Peers v. Davis, 29 Mo. 186 , nor Matlock v. Meyers, 64 Mo. 581 , cited by the court of appeals as sustaiñing that proposition, supports it, while the contrary was expressly ruled in Wannell v. … Gordon v. Parmelee, 2 Allen 213 ; Brown v. Castles, 11 Cush. 350 .

Perkins v. Silverman

284 Mo. 238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 19, 1920

Perkins and that Karshner boarded and roomed at her house. … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

State ex rel. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Sheppard

245 Mo. 50 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1912

After duly organizing, said board of supervisors appointed a board of engineers and directed them to-make a topographical survey of the lands located within the district, together with maps and profiles, and '■a plan for … We also held in the case of Little Tarkio Drainage District No. 1 v. Richardson, supra, and Little River Drainage District, J. H. Himmelberger et al. v. T. E.

Vandagrift v. Masonic Home

242 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

[Utley v. Hill, 155 Mo. l. c. 259.] … This disposes of this appeal and renders it unnecessary to discuss the applicability of the rule enounced by a divided court in Newell v.

Bonine v. City of Richmond

75 Mo. 437 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

The same principle is announced in Shearman & Redfield on Negligence, sections 148, 149, and is fully sustained by the following authorities: Russell v. Town of Columbia, 74 Mo. 480; Colby v. … City of Beaver Dam, 34 Wis. 285; Manchester v. City of Hartford, 30 Conn. 118 ; City of Springfield v. Doyle, 76 Ill. 202 ; Mayor v. Sheffield, 4 Wall. 189 ; Dewey v. City of Detroit, 15 Mich. 307 .

State v. Holder

335 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

sufficient to charge an offense under this section. [1] It is a fundamental rule of law that statutes creating felonies are to be strictly construed and will not be enlarged by implication. [59 C.J. 1113, sec. 660; State v. … Lloyd, 7 S.W.2d 344 , l.c. 346 (4-6), 320 Mo. 236 ; State v. Dishman, 334 Mo. 874 , 68 S.W.2d 797 .] *Page 178 [2] The purpose of the statute Section 4091 seems to us to be plain.

State v. Watts

248 Mo. 494 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1913

[State v. Brown, 216 Mo. l. c. 377.] … Brown, P. J., and Paris, J., concur.

General Motors Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Division of the Council on Human Relations of St. Louis

574 S.W.2d 394 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1978

V, § 3. Respondent cites Kelch v. Kelch, 450 S.W.2d 202 (Mo.1970), transferred 462 S.W.2d 161 (Mo.App.1970), and also Kansas City v. … Phelps v. McQueen, 296 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. banc 1956); Stewart v. Brown, 546 S.W.2d 204 (Mo.App.1977).

State v. Zammar

305 S.W.2d 441 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1957

State v. Carson, 323 Mo. 46, 18 S.W.2d 457 ; State v. Stewart, 329 Mo. 265 , 44 S.W.2d 100 ; State v. Latham, 344 Mo. 74 , 124 S.W.2d 1089 ; State v. Quinn, 345 Mo. 855 , 136 S.W.2d 985 ; State v. … In State v.

State ex rel. Nixon v. Jaynes

61 S.W.3d 243 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 2001

Based solely on the record (without an evidentiary hearing), the respondent Judge granted habeas corpus relief under Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.1997). … McMahon v. State, 569 S.W.2d 753, 758-59 (Mo. banc 1978); Brown v. State, 485 S.W.2d 424, 429 (Mo.1972).