Case law

State ex Informatione Lowe v. Henderson

145 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

The remaining authority relied upon by the counsel for the city district is McGurn v. Board of Education of Chicago, 133 Ill. 122 . That case most nearly resembles the one at bar of any relied on by the relator. … Hence we start from different premises from those assumed by the court in McGurn v. Board of Education, supra, and our conclusion is entirely different. Like his honor Judge G-ates, we consider the decision in State v.

Henry v. Bell

75 Mo. 194 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Louis Building Savings Association v. Lightner, 47 Mo. 393 ; State to use of Pacific R. R. Co. v. Dulle, 48 Mo. 282 . … Walter v. Ford, 74 Mo. 195 .

Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co.

259 Mo. 153 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1914

The identical point here raised was passed upon by this court in the case of Perkinson v. Weber, 251 Mo. 186 . In that case, Brown, P. … [Morley v. Weakley, 86 Mo. 451 ; Stadler v. Roth, 50 Mo. 400 ; Vieths v. The Planet Property & Financial Company, 64 Mo. App. 207 .]

Campbell v. City of Kansas

102 Mo. 326 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. 13 ; Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600 ; Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315 ; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 365 ; Reid v. Board of Ed., 73 Mo. 304 . II. … (Cal.) 728; Venable v. Coffman, 2 W. Va. 310 ; Still v. Trustees, 16 Barb. (N. Y.) 112 ; Brown v. Church, 23 Pa. St. 495 ; Foster v. Dodd, 17 Law T. R. 614; Washb. Eas. 200; Kirk v. King, 3 Pa. St. 436.

State Ex Rel. Volker v. Kirby

345 Mo. 801 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 22, 1940

The maintenance of an election board is a state function. Indeed, respondent does not contend that the maintenance of such a board is not a state function. … [State ex rel. v. Owsley, 122 Mo. 68 , 26 S. W. 659 ; State ex rel. Lynn v. Board of Education, 141 Mo. 45 , 41 S. W. 924 ; State ex rel. v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23 , 54 S. W. 524 ; State ex rel. Wm. C. Reynolds et al. v. Hy.

Loth v. City of St. Louis

257 Mo. 399 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

These propositions were fully presented by same counsel here in the case of Gilsonite Co. v. St. … Louis Fair Association, supra; Corrigan v. Kansas City, 211 Mo. 608 ; and in the case at bar.

State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Dally

50 S.W.3d 774 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 2001

Southwestern Bell v. Brown, 795 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Mo. banc 1990). For reasons that follow, the preliminary order of prohibition is made absolute. … South *777 western Bell v. Brown, supra, 795 S.W.2d at 388 . The record in this case is- thousands of pages, accompanied by numerous exhibits.

Dixon v. Hood

7 Mo. 414 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1842

In the case of Blackett v. Wier, 11th Eng. Com. L. … Brown Brown, 4 Taunton, 752.

Savings Bank v. Hunt

72 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

State v. Lusk, 18 Mo. 333 ; State v. The Auditor, 38 Mo. 193 . … Many of the eases are cited by Judge Dillon in his opinion in Harris v. Babbitt, 4 Dill. Cir. Ct. 191; among them Moss v. The State, 10 Mo. 333 , also cited as sustaining that view in Dover v. Twombly, 42 N.

Commercial Bank v. Barksdale

36 Mo. 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1865

(Edw. on B. 466 ; Leftly v. Mills, 4 T. R. 174; Carmichael v. Bank of Penn., 4 How., Miss. 567; Sarcider v. Brown, 3 McLean, 481 ; Onondagua Co. Bank v. Bates, 3 Hill. 53; Chenoweth v. Chamberlain, 6 B. Mon. 60 .) … (Caster v. Brown, 7 Humph. 548 .)

State v. Zammar

305 S.W.2d 441 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1957

State v. Carson, 323 Mo. 46, 18 S.W.2d 457 ; State v. Stewart, 329 Mo. 265 , 44 S.W.2d 100 ; State v. Latham, 344 Mo. 74 , 124 S.W.2d 1089 ; State v. Quinn, 345 Mo. 855 , 136 S.W.2d 985 ; State v. … In State v.

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Gordon

157 Mo. 71 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1900

Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 26 Pac. Rep. 394 ; People v. Railroad, 52 Mich. 277 ; C. & G. T. Railroad Co. v. Hough, 28 N. W. Rep. 532 ; I. C. Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 43 N. E. Rep. 1100; C. & N. Railroad v. … Railroad Company v. Chicago, 156 Ill. 98 ; I. C. Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 161 Ill. 251 ; C. K. & W. Railroad Co. v. Chautauqua Co., 49 Kan. 763 .

Town of Montevallo v. Village School District

268 Mo. 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1916

On July 19,1886, the board of trustees of the town of Montevallo made upon its record an order, the effective portion of which is as follows: “It is ordered by the board of trustees'of the town of Montevallo, that *221 the … Board of Education of Edina, 73 Mo. 295 , in which case the facts were substantially the same as those disclosed by this record.

Dreessen v. National Building Material Co.

319 Mo. 1010 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1928

The board was twelve inches wide and an inch thick and the upper surface was greased. After the board had been put in place they lowered the truck with the jack until the wheel, if'revolved, would just clear the board. … [Burkard v. Rope Co., 217 Mo. 466 , 117 S. W. 35 ; Wagner v. Gilsonite Co., 220 S. W. 890 .]

Smith v. Shell

82 Mo. 215 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

Story on Sales, § 269; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 384; Benjamin on Sales, §§ 249, 250; Hilliard on Sales, pp. 624, 629; 1 Greenleaf’s Ev., § 268. … Boardman v. Spooner, 13 Allen 359 .

State v. Reynolds

619 S.W.2d 741 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

But, as pointed out in Brown v. … In Brown v.

State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. Louis

145 Mo. 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

Louis, and its board of public improvements, and the members of the board, *556 viz.: Robert E. McMath, president of said board, and M. L. Holman, water commissioner; Branch H. Colby, sewer commissioner; Franklin L. … Russell v. Place, 94 U. S. 606 ; Bissell v. Spring Valley, 124 U. S. 225 ; Nesbit v. Riverside, 144 U. S. 610 .

Carter v. Ries

378 S.W.2d 487 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1964

Brown v. Scullin Steel Co., 364 Mo. 225 , 260 S.W.2d 513, 518 [3]. … As stated in the case of Brown v. Scullin Steel Company, the rule of Bailey v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Russell

129 S.W.3d 867 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 2004

Beggs v. Dormiré, 91 S.W.3d 605 (Mo. banc 2002). … or the board and to its supervision; ... ”.

Wells v. Pressy

105 Mo. 164 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Schwartz v. Page, 13 Mo. 603 ; Reilley v. Chouquette, 18 Mo. 220 ; Tigh v. Chouquette, 21 Mo. 233 ; Chouquette v. Barada, 33 Mo. 249 . … Smith v. Madison, 67 Mo. 694 ; Crispen v. Hannavan, 72 Mo. 548 ; Wilson v. Albert, 89 Mo. 537 ; Hoge v. Hubb, 94 Mo. 489 . We do not think.the legislature by the charter of the city of St.