Case law

State Ex Rel. Jamison v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

318 Mo. 285 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1927

Carthage v. Hackmann, 287 Mo. l. c. 188, 229 S. W. 1078 ; Steinbrenner v. St. Joseph, 285 Mo. l. c. 325, 226 S. W. 890 ; State ex rel. Dexter v. Gordon, 251 Mo. l. c. 309, 158 S. W. 683 .] … Hammer v. Vogelsang, 183 Mo. 17 , 81 S. W. 1087 : *292 State ex rel. Lehner v. Fullerton, 143 Mo. l. c. 686, 44 S. W. 741 .]

Main v. Lehman

294 Mo. 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 16, 1922

There was a board partition between me and Mrs. Means. Window sill was about two feet above the floor. Cannot tell how much higher top of window was than top of door. I noticed light above. … Ragland, C., concurs; Brown, C., no sitting.

Crim v. Walker

79 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

Claflin v. McDermott, 12 Fed. Rep. 375; Wintringham v. Wintringham, 20 Johns. 296 . A bill in equity will not lie at the suit of a general creditor, to set aside a conveyance charged to be fraudulent. … Martin v. Michael, 23 Mo. 50 ; Wiggins v. Armstrong, 2 Johns. Ch. 144 ; Tarbell v. Griggs, 3 Paige 207; Melville v. Brown, 1 Harr. (N. J.) 363; Merry v. Fremon, 44 Mo. 518 ; Alnutt v. Leeper, 48 Mo. 319 .

Hannerty v. Standard Theater Co.

109 Mo. 297 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Slattery v. Trans. Co., 91 Mo. 217 . There are, however, exceptions to the rule. … Smith v. Poor, 40 Me. 415 ; Ashton v. Dashaway Ass’n, 84 Cal. 61 ; Wayne Pike Co. v. Hammons, 27 N. E. Rep. 487; Hodges v. Screw Co., 1 R. I. 340.

Warner v. Goltra

334 Mo. 396 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1933

[City of Los Angeles v. United Dredging Co., 14 Fed. (2d) 365.] So was a watchman in Grimberg v. … [Hamilton v. St. Louis County Court, 15 Mo. 3 ; State ex rel. v. King, 44 Mo. 283 ; State ex rel. v. Gammon. 73 Mo. 421 ; State ex rel. v. Hitchcock, 241 Mo. 433 , 146 S. W. 40 .] In the ease of State ex rel. v.

Jones v. Williams

139 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 4, 1897

Bank v. Gilstrap, 45 Mo. 419 ; Sparks v. Dispatch Co., 104 Mo. 531 ; Moor v. Gaus & Sons Mfg. Co., 113 Mo. 106 ; First Natl. Bank v. N. Mo. Co., 86 Mo. 125 . … Cone v. Russell, 48 N. J. Eq. 212; West v. Camden, supra; Fuller v. Dame, 18 Pick. 472 ; Guernsey v. Cook, 120 Mass. 501 .

Aubuchon v. LaPlant

435 S.W.2d 648 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1968

Domijan v. Harp, Mo., 340 S.W.2d 728 ; Combs v. Combs, Mo., 284 S.W.2d 423 . … Under our decisions in Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255 , and Murphy v.

Treasurer of the State Lunatic Asylum v. Douglas

77 Mo. 647 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

Now, as to the blank left in the bond in respect to the board of Martha M. Blue. … O’Neil v. Crain, 67 Mo. 250 , and cases cited. The bond in the case at bar, shows incompleteness upon its face, in regard to the compensation to. be paid for the board of the patient.

State Ex Rel. St. Louis Fire Fighters Ass'n Local No. 73 v. Stemmler

479 S.W.2d 456 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1972

Roberts v. … ‘Affect’, 2 Words & Phrases, Perm.Ed., p. 635; National Labor Relations Board v.

Mitchell v. Handfield

33 Mo. 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1863

The plaintiff claims title under a confirmation to Louis Labeaume by the old board of commissioners in 1810. … The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Magwire v. Tyler, 1 Black, 195 , decided that the Secretary of the Interior had authority to set aside the former survey and order another to bo made.

Ex Parte Williams

345 Mo. 1121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 4, 1940

The ordinance here has put that power in the hands of a board probably as well equipped to determine that question as any that could be selected. ’ ’ *1125 In the ease of Commonwealth v. … Mackey v. Hyde, 315 Mo. 681 , 286 S.

State Ex Rel. American Automobile Insurance v. Gehner

320 Mo. 702 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1928

See, also, Scripps v. Board of Review, 183 Ill. 278 ; Hunter v. Board of Supervisors, 33 Iowa, 376 ; Thomas v. Mason Co., 67 Ky. 135 ; Horne, Collector, v. Greene, 52 Miss. 452 ; People v. … ■In Railey v. Board of Assessors, 44 La.

Hilsdorf v. City of St. Louis

45 Mo. 94 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869

(Thayer v. Boston, 19 Pick. 511 .) … In Barry v. The City, 17 Mo. 121 , the subject underwent a thorough discussion, and the leading cases were reviewed by the court.

Finch v. Ullman

105 Mo. 255 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

By these articles of incorporation a board of directors of the company was appointed to manage its concerns. … Cor., sec. 753; Thompson v. Candor, 60 Ill. 244 ; Hudson v. Corporation, 113 Ill. 618 ; Wait on Ins. Cor., sec. 22. II.

State v. Burrell

298 Mo. 672 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1923

Brown; that the appellant bears a good reputation in the community for peaceableness and quietness. … In State v. Brown, 188 Mo. l.c. 466, where the evidence tends to show that deceased struck defendant a blow with a crutch, an instruction on manslaughter was held proper. In State v.

Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.

140 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1897

McDermott v. Barnum, 19 Mo. 204 ; Craighead v. Wells, 21 Mo. 404 ; Blair v. Corby, 29 Mo. 480 ; Gavisk v. Railroad, 49 Mo. 274 ; Golson v. Ebert, 52 Mo. 260 ; Anderson v. Shockley, 82 Mo. 250 ; Father Matthew Society v. … Hamby v. Brasher, 51 Mo. 439 ; Porter v. Harrison, 52 Mo. 524 ; Meyers v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 223 .

State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Hoehn

351 Mo. 382 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

[See also Board of Commissioners of City of Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, 107 N. J. L. 35, 151 Atl. 364 (Aff. 156 Atl. 377 ); Commonwealth v. Harris (Ky.), 118 S. W. 294 ; People v. Ryan, 88 N. … In Commonwealth v.

Head v. New York Life Insurance

241 Mo. 420 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 28, 1912

. — The facts in this case are substantially the same as the facts in Head v. … Brown, G., concurs.

Seibel-Suessdorf Copper & Iron Manufacturing Co. v. Manufacturers' Railway Co.

230 Mo. 59 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 19, 1910

In Lux v. … The question to be determined by the board is' an engineering question — the practicability of the construction of the switch tracks. In State v.

Hayes v. Price

313 S.W.3d 645 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 2010

Brown, 900 S.W.2d at 633 . … Brown, 900 S.W.2d at 633 n. 3. 8 . In support of his argument that he is entitled to prejudgment interest, Mr. Hayes cites Hurst v.