Case law

Ulman v. Evans

247 S.W.2d 693 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1952

As the transcript of the hearing before the board is not a part of the instant record, we do not know what plaintiff's evidence was or upon what basis the board reduced the valuation. … See also Wymore v. Markway, 338 Mo. 46 , 89 S.W.2d 9, 11 ; State ex rel. Jamison v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 318 Mo. 285 , 300 S.W. 274, 277 .

McVicar v. WR Arthur & Company

312 S.W.2d 805 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1958

Browning Motor Freight Lines, Inc, 138 W.Va. 748 , 77 S.E.2d 806 ; Cunningham v. Bell, 149 Ohio St. 103 , 77 N.E.2d 918 ; Hartman v. Badger Tobacco Co, 210 Wis. 519 , 246 N.W. 577 ; Perry Supply Co. v. … Brown, 221 Ala. 290 , 128 So. 227 .

McGhee v. Walsh

249 Mo. 266 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1913

[Johnson v. Duer, 115 Mo. l. c. 376; Heman v. Schulte, 166 Mo. l. c. 417; Meier v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. l. c. 409; Prior v. Construction Co., 170 Mo. l. c. 448.] In the case of Prior v. … Louis v. Oeters, 36 Mo. 456 ; Kansas City v. Ridenour, 84 Mo. 253 ; St. Joseph v. Owen, 110 Mo. 445 ; *284 Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 534 ; Hill v.

State Ex Rel. Becker v. Wellston Sewer District

332 Mo. 547 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1933

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent board of supervisors of the Wellston Sewer District of St. … Hausgen v. Allen, supra, 298 Mo. l. c. 456, 250 S.

Leftridge v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

277 Mo. 90 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1919

BROWN, C. … This argument in its application to this case has been met by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U.

State v. Pierce

243 Mo. 524 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1912

In the case of State v. … He cites the following cases: State v. Priestley, 74 Mo. 24 ; State v. Owsley, 102 Mo. 678 ; State v. Scholl, 130 Mo. 396 ; State v. Hayden, 141 Mo. 311 . The cases of State v. Priestley and State v.

State v. Craig

642 S.W.2d 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1982

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 604 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); State v. Flowers, 592 S.W.2d 167, 169 (Mo. banc 1979). … Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 398-99 , 98 S.Ct. 2408, 2416-2417 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978); Brown, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261 ; Flowers, 592 S.W.2d at 168-69 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. Christopher

317 Mo. 1179 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 27, 1927

[Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra; Wulfsohn v. Burden, supra.] … [Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 234 Pac. (Cal.) 388; Fourcade v. City and County of San Francisco, 238 P. 934 .]

City of St. Joseph v. St. Joseph Terminal Railroad

268 Mo. 47 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1916

Louis v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., *59 114 Mo. l. c. 24; Brown v. City of Carthage, 128 Mo. 10 ; Columbia v. Bright, 179 Mo. l. c. 454; Wright v. Doniphan, 169 Mo. l. c. 614; State ex rel. v. Road Co., 207 Mo. l. c. 106.] … [Blodgett v. Perry, 97 Mo. l. c. 273; Austin v. Loring, 63 Mo. l. c. 19; Spence v. Renfro, 179 Mo. l. c. 422; Bank v. Nichols, 235 Mo. l. c. 412; Bigelow on Estoppel (3 Ed.), 484.]

State ex Informatione Lowe v. Henderson

145 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

The remaining authority relied upon by the counsel for the city district is McGurn v. Board of Education of Chicago, 133 Ill. 122 . That case most nearly resembles the one at bar of any relied on by the relator. … Hence we start from different premises from those assumed by the court in McGurn v. Board of Education, supra, and our conclusion is entirely different. Like his honor Judge G-ates, we consider the decision in State v.

Alexander v. Merry

9 Mo. 510 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1845

This opinion v/as not pronounced without authority to sustain it. In the case of Simonds vs. … St will be observed that no opinion has been expressed, as to the validity of the deeds executed by Brotherton & Brown.

Mochar Sales Company v. Meyer

373 S.W.2d 911 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1963

Lakin v. Postal Life and Casualty Ins. Co., Mo., 316 S.W.2d 542, 549 [3]; Marks v. … Alexopoulos v. Simmons, Mo., 371 S.W.2d 229, 231 [1, 2]; Highfill v. Brown, Mo., 320 S.W.2d 493, 497 [7, 8]; Trump v. Ballinger, Mo., 317 S.W.2d 355, 357 [1, 2].

Ward v. State

451 S.W.2d 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1970

Brown. … Edwards v. Hrebec, Mo.

State ex rel. Herbert v. Downey

572 S.W.2d 473 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1978

V, § 3. We affirm. … Niess v. Junkins, 572 S.W.2d 468 (Mo. banc 1978), decided concurrently.

State v. Berry

801 S.W.2d 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1990

In Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983), the plurality said that probable cause “does not demand any showing that such belief be correct or more likely true than false.” … Although no majority opinion from the United States Supreme Court has followed Brown , the Eighth Circuit has adopted Brown’s definition in United States v. Wayne, 903 F.2d 1188, 1196 (8th Cir.1990).

Riley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

256 Mo. 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

As supporting a contrary conclusion, plaintiff cites-: Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Bentley, 78 Kans. 221 ; Westine v. Railroad, 84 Kans. 213 ; Comstock v. Railroad, 56 Kans. 228 ; Dowell v. Railroad, 83 Kans. 562 . … In Ray v. Railroad, 82 Kans. 704 , plaintiff was clearing from the track boards and tools wMch had *605 been used in derailing a car, and it was held he fell within the exception.

Barry v. Gamble

8 Mo. 88 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1843

Brown, in April, 1818. On the 13th June, 1827, a patent issued to Lafluer, or his legal representatives. It was also offered to be proved, on the part of the defendant, that on the 13th August, 1824, Luke E. … It is stated by the petitioners, that the •claim had not been filed with the recorder of land titles, or board of commissioners, the said concession having been sent to New Orleans by .said James Mackay, and not returned

City of Hardin v. Norborne Land Drainage District

360 Mo. 1112 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1950

All concur. 1 Bruntmeyer v. Squaw Creek Dr. Dist., 196 Mo. App. 360, 367 (1), 194 SW. 748, 751(4); Greenwell v. Wills et al., 210 Mo. App. 651, 654-5 (2), 239 SW. 578, 583(2); Farrar v. Shuss, 221 Mo. … Dist. v. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 226 Mo. App. 121, 126 (1), 42 SW. (2d) 954, 956 (1); State ex rel. Hausgen v. Allen, 298 Mo. 448, 459 (2), 250 SW. 905, 907(3); Anderson v. Inter-River Dr.-Lv.

Krause v. Jeannette Investment Co.

333 Mo. 509 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 12, 1933

She and these men made up the board of directors, and the shares issued to these men were indorsed and returned to her. She had two children, Jeanette and Charles. … [Christ v. Kuehne, 172 Mo. 118 , 72 S. W. 537 ; O’Day v. Meadows, 194 Mo. 588 , 92 S. W. 657 ; Sims v. Brown, 252 Mo. 58 , 158 S. W. 624 ; Priest v. McFarland, 262 Mo. 229 , 171 S. W. 62 ; Tillman v.

Delassus v. Poston

19 Mo. 425 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1854

In Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason’s R., 212, Mr. … Brown v. Gilman, 4 Wheat. 291 . The mass of American authorities agree with the opinion expressed by Justice Story. 2.