Case law

Strother v. Kansas City

283 Mo. 283 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1920

“The Board of Police Commissioners of' Kansas. … Reynolds v. Jost. The case of State ex rel. v.

Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. McCabe

220 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1909

Brown. … The case of Cummings v. Brown, supra, is a direct adjudication upon every question applicable to the propositions disclosed by the record in the case at bar.

Krupnick and Associates, Inc. v. Hellmich

378 S.W.2d 562 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1964

Huber Hoge, Inc. v. Smith & Wesson, USDC, Mass., 33 F.2d 923, 925 , affirmed (CA 1st Mass.) 32 F.2d 699 , cert. den. 280 U.S. 586 , 50 S.Ct. 36 , 74 L.Ed. 635 . … Kastor & Sons Advertising Co. v. Grove Laboratories, (USDC, E.D., Mo.) 58 F.Supp. 1011 .

State ex rel. Gary D. Sampson, Jr., Relator v. The Honorable William E. Hickle

573 S.W.3d 76 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 2019

After oral argument in this case, the Board of Probation and Parole (hereinafter, “the Board”) issued a letter to the circuit court. … Ban v. State, 554 S.W.3d 541, 545 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018). ECC are awarded to probationers who comply with the conditions of their supervision by the Board. Id. at 545; section 217.703.1.

Cain v. Humes-Deal Co.

329 Mo. 1107 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1932

In Ryan v. … In Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co., 116 Mo. App. 154 , 90 S.W. 1158 , plaintiff's son was killed by falling into an elevator shaft.

Village of Beverly Hills v. Schulter

344 Mo. 1098 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 7, 1939

Viquesney v. … Steckert et al. v.

State ex rel. Mount Mora Cemetery Ass'n v. Casey

210 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1908

[Railroad v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. App. 162 ; Moore v. Bailey, 8 Mo. App. 156 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 69 Mo. App. 657 ; Rogers v. … [State v. Axtell, 41 N. J. Law 117; Little v. Bowers, 46 N. J. Law 300; State Board of Assessors v. Railroad, 50 N. J. Law 447, 14 Atl. 610 ; Presbyterian Board v. Fisher, 68 N. J. Law 143, 52 Atl. 228 .]

State v. Rozelle

174 Mo. 632 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1903

Clipper, 142 Mo. 474 , and State v. Carr, 142 Mo. 607 , and State v. Cornelius, 143 Mo. 179 , and State v. … Brown, 153 Mo. 578 , the-rule was announced for the first time, by the same judge, that the defendant could not appeal from a *636 judgment of conviction, upon an information, and where the case of State v.

Graefe v. St. Louis Transit Co.

224 Mo. 232 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1909

In Eswin v. … In Harrison v.

Western Bank of Missouri v. Gilstrap

45 Mo. 419 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

In American Insurance Company v. … Mumford v.

Mallory v. Barrera

544 S.W.2d 556 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1976

The court noted in Wheeler v. Barrera, supra, the decision of this court in Special District v. … Defendants suggest, and ask this court to hold, that a trust agreement method, the theory of which they say has been approved in Board of Public Buildings v.

Crosby v. Evans

281 Mo. 202 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1920

The case of Brown v. Metz, 35 Ill. 339 , is especially stressed, but affords defendants no help. … [Carroll v. Carroll, 113 Iowa, 419 .] We see no pertinency in that case to the doctrine in question. In Brown v.

Wooley v. Hays

285 Mo. 566 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1920

Bodine, 108 Iowa 594 ; Kalbach v. Clark, 133 Iowa 215 ; Kean's Lessee v. Hoffecker, 2 Harr. (Del.) 103; Farmer v. Kimball, 46 N.H. 435 ; Dukes v. Faulk, 37 S.C. 255 ; Mooney v. Purpus, 70 Ohio St. 57 ; Laisure v. … Brown and Ragland, CC., concur.

Tull v. David

45 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

(See Browne on Frauds, § 367, and the authorities cited; also, 3 Pars, on Cont. 11, note r.) In Bent v. … The nearest approach to it is found in the case of Wiley v. Roberts, 27 Mo. 388 , and Stewart v.

State Ex Rel. Meier v. Stubblefield

97 S.W.3d 476 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 4, 2003

Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 731 (Mo. banc 2002); State ex rel. Nixon v. Jaynes, 63 S.W.3d 210, 215-16 (Mo. banc 2001). … was misinformed as to the time for appeal and did not learn that no appeal had been filed until after the time had run for seeking post-conviction relief, Meier has met his burden of showing “cause and prejudice” under Brown

Gremminger v. Billings

540 S.W.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1976

Clyde V. … Ockel v. Riley, supra. All of the Judges concur.

State Ex Rel. State Building Commission v. Smith

336 Mo. 810 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1935

In Meyer v. Kansas City, 323 Mo. 200 , 18 S. … [Meyer v. Kansas City, supra.]

Weiermueller v. Scullin

203 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 29, 1907

O’Day, 173 Mo. 560 , and Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 82 . … The case of Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 95 , so holds. That is clearly an erroneous conception of the meaning' of that section.

State Ex Rel. City of Kirkwood v. Smith

357 Mo. 518 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1948

In order to enforce this provision the same section then authorizes the county board of election commissioners to appoint a special assistant election commissioner to represent the board in each precinct xvhere a municipal … Or, as we said in State ex rel. v. Reynolds, 287 Mo. 169 , 229 S.

Coleman v. Alderman

357 Mo. 758 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1948

Payne v. Stanton, 59 Mo. 158 ; Fisher v. Lewis, 69 Mo. 629 ; Snyder v. Free, 114 Mo. 360 , 21 S. W. 847 ; Lander v. Ziehr, 150 Mo. 403 , 51 S. W. 742 ; Cole v. Cole, 231 Mo. 236 , 132 S. W. 734 ; Coleman v. … R. 1289. [996] The earliest case on this point we find in this state is Rogers v. Brown, 61 Mo. 187 which was an action to set aside a conveyance for fraud of creditors.