Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.25s
State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Karpierz
105 S.W.3d 487 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 2003
Karpierz v. Easley, 31 S.W.3d 505 (Mo.App.2000)(set forth facts of underlying cause of action against the Board). 3 . Karpierz v. … As noted above, the money awarded Kar-pierz was against the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners. The Board was created pursuant to section 84.350 and has been labeled an "agency of the state.” State ex rel.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. State Building Commision v. Smith
335 Mo. 840 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 13, 1934
The word “issued” as there used authorizes said board to sell the bonds. [State ex rel. Compton Co. v. Walter, 324 Mo. 290 , 23 S. W. (2d) 167 , l. c. 172.] … He cites Fahey v. Hackmann, 291 Mo. 351 , l. c. 378, 237 S. W. 752 .
Cited 14 timesPublished336 S.W.2d 509 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1960
Just that he was a white man, I think he said five feet, eight, 160 pounds, dark complexioned; he was wearing a red cap and a brown overcoat — I think it was tan or brown trousers.’ … State v.
Cited 7 timesPublished588 S.W.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1979
In State v. … Brown, J. Wright, and C.
Cited 49 timesPublishedAllen v. St. Louis Transit Co.
183 Mo. 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1904
The seats were reached by the passengers by a board running lengthwise along each *422 side of the car forming a step and called a running-board or footboard. There was a front and a back platform. … [Coudy v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 79 ; Seymour v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 275 ; Clark v. Railroad, 127 Mo. 197 ; Hite v. Railroad, 130 Mo. 132 ; Bertram v. Railroad, 154 Mo. 639 ; Feary v. Railroad, 162 Mo. 75 ; Johnson v.
Cited 47 timesPublished327 S.W.2d 202 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1959
Waters v. Hostetter, 344 Mo. 443 , 126 S.W.2d 1164, 1166 ; Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553, 557 . … Holmes, 272 Mo. 215 , 198 S.W. 854, 859, 860 ; Beckwith v. Standard Oil Co., Mo., 281 S.W.2d 852, 855 ; Miceli v. Williams, Mo.App., 293 S.W.2d 136, 139 ; Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S,W.2d 553, 557, and Klotsch v. P. F.
Cited 13 timesPublished49 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1871
(Allen v. Richmond College, 41 Mo. 309 .) … (Smith v. Myers, 19 Mo. 433 ; Guenther v. Berkicht, 22 Mo. 439 ; Hart v. Hart, 41 Mo. 441 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished619 S.W.2d 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981
See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v, (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.
Cited 5 timesPublished257 Mo. 347 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914
[Brown v. Lead Co., 194 Mo. l. c. 700'.] … Co. v. Brown, 69 S. W. (Texas) 651. See also Pattison v. Railroad, 55 Wash. 625 ; Railroad v. Hambright, 87 Ark. 614 ; Railroad v. Richards, 23 Okla. 256 ; Hedin v. Minneapolis, etc.
Cited 20 timesPublishedTresner v. State Farm Insurance Co.
913 S.W.2d 7 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1995
See, e.g., Greer v. Zurich Insurance Company, 441 S.W.2d 15, 30-31 (Mo.1969); Brown v. Highway and Transp. Com’n, 805 S.W.2d 274, 279 (Mo.App.1991). Nevertheless, as this Court indicated in Moskowitz v. … Brown, 805 S.W.2d at 279 (quoting Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co., 676 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo. banc 1984)).
Cited 41 timesPublishedStimson v. Cathedral Mining & Smelting Co.
264 Mo. 190 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1915
[Atkinson v. Railroad, 81 Mo. l. c. 54; Belkin v. Rhodes, 76 Mo. 643 ; Missouri, Kansas & Eastern R. R. Co. v. Holschlag, 144 Mo. l. c. 256-7; Glover v. Ins. Co., 130 Mo. 173 ; McCormick v. … To the same effect are the following cases: Neidenberger v. Campbell, 11 Mo. l. c. 362; Rohrer v. Oder, 124 Mo. l. c. 32-3; Glover v. Ins. Co., 130 Mo. 173 ; Cuebas v. Cuebas, 223 U. S. l. c. 389.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Foerstel v. Higgins
144 Mo. 410 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 7, 1898
Holmes v. Dillon, 90 Mo. 229 . So, also, in State ex rel. Horstkotte v. The Board of Health of the City of St. … Louis, 90 Mo. 169 , it was ruled that the members of such board of health were not State officers within the purview of the section under discussion. A like ruling was made in State ex rel. Bender v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBarber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Ridge
169 Mo. 376 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 18, 1902
[Neill v. Gates, 152 Mo. 585 ; Rose v. Trestrail, 62 Mo. App. 352 ; McQuiddy v. Brannock, 70 Mo. App. 535 ; Trust Co. v. James, 77 Mo. App. 616 ; Springfield v. Davis, 80 Mo. App. 574 .] … [Mason v. Crowder, 85 Mo. 532 ; Spurlock v. Dougherty, 81 Mo. 171 ; Baker v. Kelley, 11 Minn. 494 .]
Cited 25 timesPublished619 S.W.2d 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981
See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished361 S.W.2d 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1962
A, It was a light tan, brown, or whatever you would call that color.” Mr. and Mrs. Cox examined the Cadillac and its contents after the collision. Corder and Pruitt were killed instantly. … These facts bring this case within the rule laid down in Adelsberger v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWestglen Village Associates v. Leachman
654 S.W.2d 897 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 16, 1983
This approach would excuse West-glen’s failure to seek relief before the Board of Equalization and the Tax Commission. Jurisdiction is in this court to construe revenue laws. Mo. Const. Art. V, § 3. … John Calvin Manor, Inc. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedDonnelly Garment Co. v. Keitel
354 Mo. 1138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1946
An Oklahoma case, Board of Review et al. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp., 193 Okla. 36 , 141 P.2d 69 , involved the validity of a labor dispute in which he was engaged. … Peck Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189 , 105 S.W.2d 909 , l.c. 911.
Cited 14 timesPublished121 Mo. 434 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1894
State v. Simon, 50 Mo. 370 ; State v. McCannon, 51 Mo. 160 ; State v. Mathes, 90 Mo. 571 ; State v. Stephens, 96 Mo. 638 ; State v. Umble, 115 Mo. 452 . … The case in hand was submitted to the jury before 12 o’clock Saturday night, and is unlike the case of State v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedC. H. Albers Commission Co. v. Spencer
205 Mo. 105 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1907
We are referred to Crawford v. … [Pacaud v. Waite, 218 Ill. 138 .] The only error the trial court committed was in issuing the temporary injunctions in the first place, but that error it has itself corrected. The judgment is affirmed. All concur.
Cited 8 timesPublished13 Mo. 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1850
This the board of' aldermen clearly had no power to do. … (a) Bird v. Montgomery, 6 Mo. R. 528; Delauriere v. Emmerson, 14 Mo. R. 37; Funkhouser v. Longkolb, 26 Mo. R. 453.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna