Case law

Crockett v. City of Mexico

336 Mo. 145 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1934

[Roth v. St. Joseph, 164 Mo. App. 26 , 147 S.W. 490 ; McCarroll v. Kansas City, 64 Mo. App. 283 .] … [City of Independence v. Missouri, etc., Railroad Co., 86 Mo.

Montgomery v. Miller

131 Mo. 595 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1895

Brown, which notes were afterward transferred by said Brown to the-plaintiff, the Dallas county bank. … Holdsworth v. Shannon, 113 Mo. 508 ; Stoffel v. Schroeder, 62 Mo. 147 ; Kelly v. Hurt, 61 Mo. 463 . The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, to be proceeded with according to the views expressed in this opinion.

State v. Collins

619 S.W.2d 66 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Ruckels v. Pryor

351 Mo. 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

Brown, of Brown Brothers, nor with William List of the List Construction Company; that he in fact did not know who bid on the job. … Brown further testified: “Q. Mr.

State Ex Rel. School District v. Thompson

327 Mo. 144 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 3, 1931

State ex rel. v. … Clark County v. Hackmann, 280 Mo. 686, 702 , 218 S. W. 318 .]

Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

550 S.W.2d 780 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1977

In Brown v. St. … Skadal v. Brown, 351 S.W.2d 684, 690 (Mo. 1961).

State v. Terry

485 S.W.2d 3 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1972

This was settled by Adams v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 278 , 92 S.Ct. 916 , 31 L.Ed.2d 202 , decided March 6, 1972. Consistently, Missouri has not applied Coleman v. Alabama retroactively. Dean v. … State, Mo., 461 S.W.2d 861 (1971); State v. Lahmann, Mo., 460 S.W.2d 559 (1970); Sallee v. State, Mo., 460 S.W.2d 554 (1970); State v. Caffey, Mo., 457 S.W.2d 657 (1970); Rule 23. *5 03, V.A.M.R. See also Konvalin v.

Nickerson v. Lynch

135 Mo. 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 7, 1896

State ex rel. v. Rombauer, 124 Mo. 598 . … Said petition was presented to each board on December 2, 1891, and thereupon it was ordered that the two boards meet the next day as a joint board and accordingly they met on the third day of December, 1891.

Lakewood Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

530 S.W.2d 240 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1975

Cemetery Co. v. … Whitsett v.

Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

343 Mo. 1104 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1939

In Brown v. St. L. S.F. Ry. … [Brown v. St. Louis S.F. Ry.

Preisler v. Calcaterra

362 Mo. 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

Witt v. Bernon, Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., 11 O. L. A. 318. … McDaniel v. Schramm, 272 Mo. 541 , 199 S. W. 194 ; State ex rel. Rolston v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 246 Mo. 512, 1 . c. 517, 152 S. W. 28 ; State ex rel. Tolerton v. Gordon, 236 Mo. 142, 1 . c. 170, 139 S.

State v. McGee

619 S.W.2d 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v, (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

State v. Lowery

619 S.W.2d 77 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Demaray v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

330 Mo. 589 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1932

[Woods v. St. Louis Merchants’ Bridge Terminal Ry. Co., 8 S. W. (2d) 922 ; Nahorski v. St. Louis Electric Terminal Ry. Co., 271 S. W. 749 .] … [Moran v. Kansas City Railways Co., 232 S. W. 1111 ; Evy v. Davis, 244 S. W. 954 ; Spencer v. Railroad, 317 Mo. 492 , 297 S. W. 353 ; Baker v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 533 , 26 S. W. 20 .]

Dickey v. Porter

203 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1907

[Meddis v. Kenney, 176 Mo. 200 ; Adair v. Mette, 156 Mo. 507 ; Cornelius v. Grant, 8 Mo. 59 ; Hart v. Leete, 104 Mo. 338 .] VI. … [Becker v.

State ex rel. Carrollton School District v. Gordon

231 Mo. 547 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1910

[State ex rel. v. McIntosh, 205 Mo. l. c. 593.] … [Thomas v. Scott, 221 Mo. l. c. 279; Hartzler v. Railroad, 218 Mo. l. c. 565.]

State Ex Rel. Brickey v. Nolte

350 Mo. 842 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1943

Brickey, as an officer and member of the school board of plaintiff school district, occupied a fiduciary relationship to the plaintiff. Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 of Jackson County v. Shawhan (Mo. … See, also, Deering v. Hurt (Texas), 2 S.W. 42 . In the case of New v.

Seaboard National Bank v. Woesten

176 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1903

[Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hezel, 155 Mo. 391 ; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 1 . c. 556.] In the case last cited, Gantt, C. … Norman, 72 Mo. 380 , and Eyerman v. Blaksley, 78 Mo. 145 .

Whaley v. Peak

49 Mo. 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1871

(Allen v. Richmond College, 41 Mo. 309 .) … (Smith v. Myers, 19 Mo. 433 ; Guenther v. Berkicht, 22 Mo. 439 ; Hart v. Hart, 41 Mo. 441 .)

Sanford v. City of Kansas

69 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

To the board of police commissioners belonged the exclusive control of all matters pertaining to the employment, pay and regulation of the police force of the city. Flanagan v. The City of Kansas, ante, p. 462. … We, therefore, affirm the judgment, regarding mandamus against the board of police commissioners as plaintiff’s appropriate remedy, since it is the duty of the board, both to fix the amount and to draw a requisition for the