Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.83s
Wehrkamp v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.
436 S.W.2d 698 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1969
(See Fellows v. … In the case of Harter v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedState ex rel. Garesché v. Slevin
93 Mo. 253 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887
Brandt on Suretyship, sec. 495; Commonwealth v. Wenrick, 8 Watts [Pa.] 159. … This instruction, under the evidence, was fully warranted by the case of Folger v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedArnold v. Reorganized School District No. 3 of Scotland County
289 S.W.2d 90 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1956
The Board of Education had certified the results of said election as hereinbefore stated. … Appellants cite Missouri Electric Power Co. v. City of Mountain Grove, 352 Mo. 262 , 176 S.W.2d 612 , and other authorities. “II.
Cited 7 timesPublished333 S.W.2d 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1960
No. 1 v. … School District No. 4 v.
Cited 1 timesPublished283 S.W.2d 531 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955
In Buss v. … Bruner v. Skibsaktieselskabet Hiída Knudsen, supra; Hutto v. Benson, supra; Webster v. Isbell, supra; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Texas P. & L. Co., supra; Buss v. Robison, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Glaser
245 Mo. 377 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1912
[Schuermann v. Insurance Co., 165 Mo. 649 ; Keller v. Insurance Co., 198 Mo. 440 ; Kern v. Legion of Honor, 167 Mo. 471 ; Union Life Insurance Co. v. Riggs, 123 Fed. 312 .] In the case of Kern v. … Brown, P. J., and Ferriss, J., concur.
Cited 23 timesPublished456 S.W.2d 324 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1970
See State v. Ussery, 357 Mo. 414 , 208 S.W.2d 245 ; State v. Brown, Mo., 404 S.W.2d 179 ; State v. Walker, Mo., 416 S.W.2d 134 ; State v. McGee, Mo., 447 S.W.2d 270 . In State v. … We conclude that Harrison v. United States, supra, does not require the abandonment of the long established rule announced in State v. Ussery, supra; State v. Brown, supra; and State v. McGee, supra.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. INC. v. Mahn
766 S.W.2d 443 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1989
On June 11,1986, the Hillsboro Board of Education (Board) held a special meeting to discuss the financial condition of the district involving a projected financial shortage during the 1986-87 school year. … D. v. Westran R-I Sch. D., 686 S.W.2d 491, 496 (Mo.App.1984). 2 Mo.
Cited 18 timesPublishedEdmondson v. Hotels Statler Co.
306 Mo. 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1924
[Cluett v. Light Co., 205 S. W. 72 ; Ibid, 220 S. W. 865 ; Benton v. St. Louis, 248 Mo. 98 ; State ex rel. Lusk v. Ellison, 271 Mo. 463 ; Main v. Lehman, 294 Mo. 579 ; Mullen v. Mercantile Co., 260 S. W. 982 ; Ryan v. … In Williamson v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedDunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
621 S.W.2d 245 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1981
Boxcars are lined with tongue and groove boards or plywood sheets, nailed to stringers in the ends of the boxcars. A stringer is a four by four wooden board, sometimes oak and more frequently a softer wood, pine or fir. … “Q You mean narrow boards? “A Narrow tongue and groove. “Q New? “A Yes. “Q Going back to another matter for just a minute.
Disapproved on other grounds by St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Dickerson, 470 U.S. 409 (1985)Cited 49 timesPublished71 S.W.3d 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 2002
On July 22,1991, defendant and Norman Brown went to the Honickmans’ store. … Defendant and Brown returned to the store that evening. After viewing some diamonds, defendant and Brown went into a hallway, purportedly to discuss the diamond prices.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSchaefer v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.
128 Mo. 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1895
In the case of Schepers v. … See case of Furnish v. Railroad, 102 Mo. 438 , and cases there cited.
Cited 28 timesPublishedState ex rel. Field v. Randall
308 S.W.2d 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1958
Barr v. … Barr v.
Cited 3 timesPublished20 Mo. 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1854
The Supreme Court of Tennessee, in 1842, in 'the case of Bachman v. … In the case of Sallee v. Waters, ( 17 Ala.
Cited 28 timesPublishedState ex rel. Broadhead v. Berg
76 Mo. 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1882
Ford v. … In the case of Lewis v.
Cited 13 timesPublished93 Mo. 146 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887
State ex rel. v. Keuchler, 83 Mo. 193 ; State v. Rhodes, 86 Mo. 635 ; Brown v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 478 ; Cissell v. Cissell, 77 Mo. 371 ; Stavely v. Kunkel, 27 Mo. 422; Lengel v. Smith, 48 Mo. 276 ; Clelland v. … Shaw, 51 Mo. 440 ; State ex rel. v. Lewis, 71 Mo. 170 ; Randolph v. Mauck, 78 Mo. 468 ; R. S., 1879, sec. 1973.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGladys Child Soars v. Soars-Lovelace, Inc.
346 Mo. 710 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 4, 1940
[Barlow v. Shawnee Inv. Co., 229 Mo. App. 1 , 48 S.W.2d 35 ; Aitchison v. Industrial Comm., 188 Wis. 218 , 205 N.W. 806 , 44 A.L.R. 1213 ; Midwest Motor Coach Co. v. Elliott (Ind.), 182 N.E. 541 ; Duesenberg v. … (Ind.), 187 N.E. 750 ; Donaldson v. Donaldson Co. (Minn.), 223 N.W. 772 ; Erickson v. Erickson Furniture Co. (Minn.), 229 N.W. 101 ; Brown v. Conway Elect. L. P. Co. (N.H.), 129 A. 633 ; Hodges v. Home Mortgage Co.
Cited 36 timesPublished338 Mo. 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1935
He waited until the last afternoon of the sitting of the board of equalization, to inquire of the county clerk whether the board had as yet taken up the Wymore property. … Louis v. Caulfield, 333 Mo. 270 , 62 S.
Cited 10 timesPublished74 Mo. 286 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881
This was a matter for the determination of the board of directors. As was well observed by the supreme court Indiana, in Judah v. … Gill v. Balis, 72 Mo. 432 . In Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U.
Cited 12 timesPublishedParker v. Chamber of Commerce of Ava
447 S.W.2d 280 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1969
Appellant states that the “allegations forming the background of this case are the same as those in case No. 54232, Parker v. Lowery et al., argued before this Court on September 17, 1969.” … We hold that the issues in this case are ruled by the law stated in Parker v. Lowery et al., Mo.Sup., 446 S.W.2d 593 (No. 54232), decided November 10, 1969. The judgment is affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna