Case law

Austin v. Mehlville R-9 School District

564 S.W.2d 884 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1978

The chancellor held that the board of education gave the wrong reason for transferring plaintiff; that the real reason for the board’s action was to discipline and punish plaintiff (who was contented to teach at Oakville … In contrast with Pickering v.

State v. Williams

623 S.W.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1981

Dodson, the arresting officer, testified that when he talked to defendant in Indiana, defendant said his name was Curtis Brown. Evidence of flight or concealment is generally admissible in a criminal proceeding. … State v. Cochran, 366 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Mo.1963); State v. Lenza, 582 S.W.2d 703, 710 (Mo.App.1979); cert. den. 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 678 , 62 L.Ed.2d 652 . See also State v.

Honey Creek Drainage District v. Farm City Investment Co.

326 Mo. 739 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 18, 1930

When the opinions in Squaw Creek Drainage District v. Turney, 235 Mo. 80 , and Elsberry Drainage District v. … W. 985 ; Squaw Creek Drainage Dist. v. Turney, supra; Houck v. Drainage Dist., 248 Mo. 373 , 154 S. W. 739 ; In re Mississippi & Fox River Drainage District: Buschling v. Ackley, 270 Mo. 157 , 192 S. W. 727 ; Neal v.

County of Platte v. James

489 S.W.2d 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1973

Behrens v. Crismon, 354 Mo. 174 , 188 S.W.2d 937, 939 [4, 5] and authorities cited. … State v. A. T. & T.

Seested v. Dickey

318 Mo. 192 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1927

While in Dickey v. … V.

State ex rel. Aziz v. McCondichie

132 S.W.3d 238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 27, 2004

Aziz’s petition for habeas corpus alleged various violations of the due process standards set forth in Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 38 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and State ex rel. Mack v. … V, sec. 4. After Aziz filed his petition here, this Court granted its writ and appointed counsel for Aziz. 1 While this matter has been pending, the board granted Aziz a new parole revocation hearing.

State v. Kendrick

619 S.W.2d 61 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. —, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Morrison v. Morey

146 Mo. 543 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1898

Lockwood v. St. Louis, 24 Mo. 20 ; Garrett v. St. Louis, 25 Mo. 505 ; Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; St. Louis to use v. Clemens, 36 Mo. 467 ; Uhrig v. St. Louis, 44 Mo. 458 ; Sheehan v. … Mathis, 21 Ark. 40 ; Jones v. Board Ald., 104 Mass. 461 ; Egyptian Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 495 ; Hagar v. Supervisors, 47 Cal. 231 ; People v. Hagar, 52 Cal. 183 ; People v. Mayor, 4 N. Y. 430 ; Sears v.

Hill v. Swingley

159 Mo. 45 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1900

What was said by this court in Wheeler v. City of Poplar Bluff, *49 149 Mo. 36 , and by our Kansas City Court of Appeals in City of Independence v. Briggs, 58 Mo. … [Farrar v. St. Louis, 80 Mo. 379 ; Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Barber Asph. P. Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 534 .]

State ex rel. Grimm v. Manhattan Rubber Manufacturing Co.

149 Mo. 181 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1899

[Calumet Paper Co. v. Haskell Show Ptg. Co., 144 Mo. 331 .] … In Milling Co. v.

State v. Carson

231 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 29, 1910

Afterwards in State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. 696 , the *9 jury found defendant guilty and assessed Ms punishment. … The conclusion we have reached on this question is supported by the decision of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in State v. Morgan, 96 Mo. App. 343 , l. c. 345-6, and by the St. Louis Court of Appeals in State v.

Pash v. City of St. Joseph

257 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914

Such a provision confers no power on the board to legislate, but simply imposes a limitation upon the council. Until the council acts, no park can be established. [St. Louis v. … And in State ex rel. v.

State Ex Rel. Otto v. St. Louis College of Physicians & Surgeons

317 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1927

[State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. l. c. 345-354, and cases cited.] . “The burden of proof in this case rests upon the relator. [State ex rel. Walker v. Talbot, 123 Mo. 69 -71.] … [Corpus Juris, p. 1000, par. 39-D; State v. Mount Hope College, 63 Ohio St. 341 ; Independent Medical College v. People, 182 Ill. 274 ; Illinois Health University v. People, 166 Ill. 171 ; Edgar Collegiate Institute v.

Hamilton v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

318 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1927

Co. v. … [Smart v. Kansas City, 91 Mo. App. 586 ; Epperson v. Telegraph Co., 155 Mo. 346 ; Smith v. Bank, 99 Mass. 605 ; Searles v. Railroad, 101 N.Y. 661 ; Peirce v. Kile, 26 C.C.A. 201 .]"

State Ex Rel. Hocker v. Nolte.

330 Mo. 299 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1932

The board shall be constituted as follows: “(a) The president of the board of police commissioners of said cities, ex officio. “ (b) The comptroller of the said cities, ex officio. … L. pp. 920-922, secs. 170-172; Smith v. State, 14 Mo. 111 ; State ex rel. v. Draper, 47 Mo. 29 ; State v. Roller, 77 Mo. 120 ; In re Poindexter v. Pettis County, 295 Mo. 629 , 246 S. W. 38 ; State ex rel. v.

State Ex Rel. Moore v. Glassco

347 Mo. 977 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1941

Donovan v. Retirement Board, 326 Ill. 579 , 158 N. … King v. Firemen’s Pension Fund, 192 Mo. App. 583 , 184 S. W. 929 (where a fireman was killed in a fight while off duty) ; McAuliffe v. Policemen’s Pension Fund (Ky.), 115 S.

Preston v. Missouri & Pennsylvania Lead Co.

51 Mo. 43 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1872

(Christian University v. Jordon, 29 Mo. 68 ; Southern Hotel v. Newman, 80 Mo. 118 ; Buckley v. Briggs, 30 Mo. 452 ; Fayles v. National Ins. Co., 49 Mo. 380 ; Western Bank of Missouri v. … Gilstrap, 45 Mo. 419 ; 2 Kent’s Com. 291; Davenport v. Peoria Ins. Co., 17 Iowa, 276 ; Dunn v. Rector, 14 Johns. 118 ; American Ins. Co. v. Oakly, 9 Paige, 496 ; Magill v.

Peters v. Buckner

288 Mo. 618 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1921

[Bridgewater v. Ocean City Ry. Co., 62 N. J. Eq. 276, 49 Atl. 801 ; Schickhaus v. Sanford, 83 N. J. Eq. 454, 91 Atl. 878 ; Ring v. Union Trust Co., 226 Mo. 351 ; Bolin v. Inv. Co., 273 Mo. 257 , by Brown, C. … Louis, 122 Mo. 132, 138-140 ; United States v. Certain Lands, 112 Fed. 622 ; Doan v. Cleveland Short Line, 92 Ohio St. 461 ; Frazer v. City of Chicago, 186 Ill. 480 ; Bacon v. Walker, 77 Ga. 336 ; Long v.

Association for Educational Development v. Hayward

533 S.W.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1976

V, sec. 3, Mo.Const., as amended 1970. … Palo Alto Tenants’ Union v.

City of St. Louis v. Turner

331 Mo. 834 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1932

Louis v. Abeln, 170 Mo. 318, 323 , 70 S. W. 708 '.] … Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545, 567 , 56 S. W. 298 .]