Case law

Puller v. Royal Casualty Co.

271 Mo. 369 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1917

[Jones v. … [Jones v. Williams, 139 Mo. 1 .] In that case the board employed an editor. *389 of a paper for a period of five years, and this court field the contract valid.

State ex rel. Proctor v. Walker

193 Mo. 693 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1906

It was said in City of Quincy v. … [Ewing v. Hoblitzelle, 85 Mo. 64 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 ; State v. Addington, 77 Mo. 110 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 48 Mo. 470 .]

Horizons West Properties v. Leachman

548 S.W.2d 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1977

John Calvin Manor, Inc. v. *553 Aylward, 517 S.W.2d 59, 65 [6] (Mo.1974). … And, as stated, only that Board has authority to reduce an assessment.

Mueller v. Hoffmeister Undertaking & Livery Co.

343 Mo. 430 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1938

Defendant appealed from the decision of the building commissioner to the board of adjustment, and on February 7, 1934, this board granted the permit. … Ludwig et al., constituting the board of adjustment. Certiorari writ was issued, and the board filed return and the certiorari cause was submitted.

Russell v. Johnson

349 Mo. 267 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1941

[Mosely v. Sum et al. 344 Mo. 969 , 130 S.W.2d 465 , l.c. 469, and cases there cited.] … [Courtney v. Ocean Accident Guaranty Corporation, 346 Mo. 703 , 142 S.W.2d 858 , l.c. 860; Parrent v. Mobile Ohio R. Co., 334 Mo. 1202 , 70 S.W.2d 1068 , l.c. 1073, and cases there cited.]

Bledsoe v. Stallard

250 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1913

Coleman v. … [State v. Layton, 160 Mo. 474 ; State ex rel. v. McIntosh, 205 Mo. 589 ; State ex rel. v. Fort, 210 Mo. 512 , l. c. 526.]

May v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

284 Mo. 508 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1920

In Keep v. Indianapolis St. Louis Railway Co., and Keep v. … V.

State v. Crews

619 S.W.2d 76 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v, Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Linwood State Bank v. Lientz

413 S.W.2d 248 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1967

The law in this regard is stated in Farmers & Merchants Bank v. … See also Wilks v. Stone, Mo.App., 339 S.W.2d 590, 595 ; Milligan v. G. D.

O'Connell v. School District of Springfield R-12

830 S.W.2d 410 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1992

Id.; Hanlon v. Board of Education of Parkway School District, 695 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Mo.App.1985). This 30 day period can be expanded, and will be referred to as the “curative period.” … The law is well-settled that the school board for the district that initiates charges against the teacher may also conduct the hearing, absent actual bias or prejudice. Ross v.

Prior v. Buehler & Cooney Construction Co.

170 Mo. 439 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1902

Louis v. Oeters, 36 Mo. 456 ; Kansas City v. Ridenour, 84 Mo. 253 ; St. Joseph v. Owen, 110 Mo. 445 ; Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Heman v. Schulte, 166 Mo. 409 ; Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. … Joseph v. Farrell, 106 Mo. 437 ; Heman v. Allen, 156 Mo. 534 ; Schumate v. Heman, 181 U. S. 402 ; Heman v. Schulte, 166 Mo. 409 ; Hill v. Swingley, 159 Mo. 45 ; Barber Asphalt Co. v.

Emmel v. Hayes

102 Mo. 186 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Browne on Prauds, secs. 478 and 480. … The case of Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Kessler v. Hackmann

304 Mo. 453 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1924

Relators cite the case of State ex rel. v. … Fath v. Henderson, 160 Mo. 190 ,l. c. 214; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 236 *459 Mo. 142, l. c. 158.] In the case last cited the court had under consideration a fund for the support and maintenance of the Game Department.

Third National Bank v. St. Charles Savings Bank

244 Mo. 554 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1912

[Squier v. Evans, 127 Mo. l. c. 519; Liebke v. Knapp, 79 Mo. l. c. *576 26-7.] … J., Graves, Ferriss and Kennish, JJ., concur; Brown, J., concurs in result; Wood-son, JJ., dissents in an opinion filed.

Bushnell v. Mississippi & Fox River Drainage District

340 Mo. 811 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 17, 1937

[Wilson v. King's Lake Drainage Levee District, 237 Mo. 39 , 139 S.W. 136 .] … [See, also, Chilton v. Drainage District No. 8 of Pemiscot County, 332 Mo. 1173 , 61 S.W.2d 744 .]

State v. Crews

619 S.W.2d 78 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Norris v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

239 Mo. 695 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

Brown, 168 Mo. l. c. 474, and State v. David, 159 Mo. 534 . These cases sustain plaintiff’s theory, but the rule of law which they announce is no longer adhered to by this court. [State v. … [Kerr v. Railroad, 113 Mo. App. 5 ; Harmon v. Donohoe, 153 Mo. 274 ; *718 Matthews v. Railroad, 142 Mo. 666 ; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 .] In Kerr v.

Flynn v. Janssen

266 S.W.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1954

Louis v. Brown, 305 Mo. 182 , 264 S.W. 675 ; Blandon v. Martin, 50 Mo.App. 114 ; School District No. 24 v. Mease, Mo.App., 205 S.W.2d 146 ; First Nat. Bank v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 264 S.W. 677 ; Nichols Wire & Sheet Co. v. … Brown, Mo.Sup., 264 S.W. 677 ; Oliver Chilled Plow Works v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 264 S.W. 677 .

Preisler v. Calcaterra

362 Mo. 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

Witt v. Bernon, Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., 11 O. L. A. 318. … McDaniel v. Schramm, 272 Mo. 541 , 199 S. W. 194 ; State ex rel. Rolston v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 246 Mo. 512, 1 . c. 517, 152 S. W. 28 ; State ex rel. Tolerton v. Gordon, 236 Mo. 142, 1 . c. 170, 139 S.

Henry v. Mount Pleasant Township of Bates County

70 Mo. 500 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1879

and Bassett that said board would settle separately with Bassett and pay him the sum of $7,000 in satisfaction of said obligation, and that said board would then *503 assume that said payment to and settlement with Bassett … Clark v. Cable, 21 Mo. 225 .