Case law

Brown v. Cleaveland

5 Mo. 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1837

Brown brought an action of ejectment against Cleave-land in the circuit court, and judgment being there given againsthim, he prosecutes this writ of error to reverse that judgment. … In his declaration, Brown claims four hundred arpens of land, originally granted by the Spanish Government, and confirmed by the United States to Benjamin Stro* ther.

Brown v. Pratte

9 Mo. 331 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1845

Brown, jr. The summons issued by the justice, required R. T. Brown, to answer the plaintiff, B. S. … The summons was duly served on the defendant, Brown, and on the 9th September, the day appointed for the trial, the defendant appeared and moved to quash the writ, because the defendant was summoned to answer B. S.

Brown v. Gauss

10 Mo. 265 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1846

This contract contained many stipulations respecting the compensation of Brown for retaking the slaves. … This action is brought by Brown, to recover the compensation to which, he alleges, he is entitled under the agreement.

McCurdy v. Brown

8 Mo. 549 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1844

of county officers on their official bonds,” for the failure of Brown, the constable, to return an execution. … McCurdy recovered against Brown and Gibson double the amount of the execution.

State v. Brown

139 Mo. 522 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1897

State v. Brown

188 Mo. 400 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 1905

Kelsy v. Brown

4 Mo. 8 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1835

That court, on Kelsy’s motion, dismissed the cause for want of notice of the appeal from the justice; and to reverse the judgment of the circuit court Brown now prosecutes his appeal in this court. … See 23 of the “act to establish justices’ courts, passed 21st 1825f ’ ]\j0 COpy 0f the notice served on Kelsy seems to , 1 , , , , , , r, have been kept by the deiendant Brown.

Brown v. Ravenscroft

1 Mo. 397 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1823

See Gov. of Missouri v. Rector, 1 Mo. R.,p. 638. Snell v. Owens, 3 “ “ 225. Posey v. Buckner, 3 " “ 605.

Robinson v. Brown

52 Mo. 63 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1873

Brown v. Benton

1 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1822

Brown v. Holman

315 Mo. 478 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1926

[See Brown v. Holman, 238 S. W. 1065 .] … In Adams v. Main, 3 Ind. App. 232 , 29 N.

Brown v. North

21 Mo. 528 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1855

There is no pretext for this demand made by Brown on North. The note was obtained by fraudulent representations, and should not be allowed to support an action. … Suppose Brown had bought the land at $5 per acre, would he have claimed that Mesne and North must pay him the difference between the prices at $5 and at $8 per acre ?

Brown v. King & Fisher

10 Mo. 56 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1846

Brown Dr. To King 8? … Brown Dr. 1843. To King Fisher, Aug. 9.

State v. Brown

216 Mo. 351 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 2, 1909

Kochtitzky falsely pretend, represent and state to said Kochtitzky, that he, the said Brown, had completed certain work under a contract, which entitled said Brown to receive from said Kochtitzky the sum of $75; and the said … An examination of the cases of State v. Austin, 113 Mo. 538 , and State v.

Brown v. Kroger Company

344 S.W.2d 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1961

Henry v. … Stafford v. Fred Wolferman, Inc., Mo., 307 S.W.2d 468, 473 [1-3]; Barken v. S. S. Kresge Co., Mo.App., 117 S.W.2d 674 , 678[l-3]; 65 C.J.S. Negligence § 45a, p. 524.

Kansas City v. Brown

286 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1920

Co. v. … [Gardner v. St. Joseph, 96 Mo. App. 657 , l. c. 661; Burde v. St. Joseph, 130 Mo. App. 453 ; Rude v. St. Louis, 93 Mo. 408 ; Wallace v. Ry. Co., 47 Mo. App. 491 ; Stephenson v. Railway, 68 Mo. App. 642 ; Clemens v.

Tate v. Brown

335 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1934

[State ex rel. v. Burton, 283 Mo. 41 , 222 S. W. 844 , and cases cited.] … May De *489 partment Stores Co. v. Haid, 327 Mo. 567 , 38 S. W. (2d) 44 .] Sucb is the situation in this case. For the reasons stated, the attempted appeal herein should be dismissed. It is so ordered. All concur.

Brown v. Philips

300 Mo. 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 5, 1923

[Skinker v. Heman, 148 Mo. 349 ; Barber Asphalt Co. v. French, 158 Mo. 534 ; Field v. Barber Asphalt Co., 194 U. S. 618 .] … [Lester Real Estate Co. v. St. Louis, 169 Mo. 227 ; Thomas v. Musical Union, 121 N. Y. 45 ; Kerr v. Riddle, 31 S. W. (Tex.) 328; Springer v. Walters, 139 Ill. 419 ; Roudanez v. New Orleans, 29 La. Ann. 271 .]

Knox County v. Brown

103 Mo. 223 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Brown and Annie E. … Mason v. Black, 87 Mo. 329.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

85 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 24, 2002

In McCabe v. … In Smyth v.