Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

0.47s

  • Batek v. Curators of the University of Missouri

    920 S.W.2d 895 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 23, 1996

    In Miguel v. … Womack v. Callaway County, 159 S.W.2d 630 , 632 (Mo.1942) (quoting Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg. Co., 316 Mo. 1023, 1028 , 292 S.W. 1023, 1025 (Mo.1927)); see also Hasenyager v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

    358 Mo. 365 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1948

    The board was not expressly declared to be a corporate body. Yet the board was recognized by this court as a quasi corporation. John O’Brien Boiler Works v. Third Nat’l. Bank of St. Louis, 282 Mo. 670 , 222 S. … State Highway Commission v. Bates, 317 Mo. 696 , 296 S. W. 418 . See the authoritative discussion on this subject by Judge Goode in American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commrs., 285 Mo. 581 , 227 S.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Mead v. Jasper County

    305 Mo. 476 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1924

    In Bayless v. … to such term or session. ’ ’ ■ *487 In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n. of St. Louis

    358 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1948

    Manche v. St. Louis Basket Box Co., (Mo. Sup.), 262 S.W. 1021 ; Baltimore Ohio R. Co. v. Newell, 196 F. 866, 868, 869 ; York v. Kansas City C. S. Ry. Co., 117 Mo. 405 , 411, 412, 22 S.W. 1081 ; Kelley v. … Bailey v. Cent. Vt. Ry. Co., supra; Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645 , 652; Ellis v. Union Pac. R.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pritt v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis

    359 Mo. 896 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1949

    also testified he did not see the board fall; he did not know a board had fallen; he was walking east with his back to the men; and "guessed" he was 30 feet east by the time the board was knocked off. … State ex rel. v. Trimble, supra; Baker v. Wood (Mo.), 142 S.W.2d 83 , 84[2]; State ex rel. v. Bland, 354 Mo. 868 , 191 S.W.2d 660 ; Huckleberry v. Missouri Pac. Rd.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kansas City Loan Guarantee Co. v. Smith

    176 Mo. 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1903

    [Bennett v. Railroad, 105 Mo. 642 ; Baldwin v. Fries, 103 Mo. 286 ; Turley v. Barnes, 131 Mo. 548 ; Browning v. Powers, 142 Mo. 322 ; Hulett v. Railroad, 145 Mo. 35 ; Ash v. … Railroad, 152 Mo. 544 ; Vansandt v. Hobbs, 153 Mo. 655 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 ; Hardin v. City of Carthage, 171 Mo. 442 ; Brown v. Railroad, 1. 75 Mo. 185 .]

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Maze v. Boehm

    281 Mo. 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1920

    [Horince v. Ins. Co., 201 S.W. 958 ; Williamson v. Brown, 195 Mo. 313 , l.c. 332-333; Parker v. Vanhoozer, 142 Mo. 627 ; Ins. Co. v. Lead Co., 169 Mo. App. 561 : Dougherty v. Dougherty, 204 Mo. 228 : Moran Bolt Nut Mfg. … Co. v. St. Louis Car Co., 210 Mo. 729 ; Brown v. Gwin, 197 Mo. 506 ; 2 Pomerov's Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 845; Thompson v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 136 U.S. 287 , l.c. 295; Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Bell

    950 S.W.2d 482 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 19, 1997

    In the leading case in this area, Shepard v. … State v. Boliek, 706 S.W.2d 847, 850 (Mo. banc 1986). . Id. . See State v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Troll v. City of St. Louis

    257 Mo. 626 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 4, 1914

    If the game be worth the candle, then such an one may consult Maguire v. Vice, 20 Mo. 429 ; Magwire v. Tyler, 25 Mo. 484 ; Magwire v. Tyler, 30 Mo. 202 ; Magwire v. Tyler, 40 Mo. 406 ; Magwire v. … [Shanks v. Klein, supra; Easton v. Courtwright, supra.]

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Houston v. Northup

    460 S.W.2d 572 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1970

    Consequently, we have held in cases such as Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255 , and Murphy v. … This is not a situation wherein prejudice is presumed, pursuant to Brown v. St.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Peet v. Spencer

    90 Mo. 384 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

    In State to the use of Phillips v. … Van Heusen v. Radcliff, 17 N. Y. 580 ; Heinrich v. Wood, 7 Mo. App. 236 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Wegmann Realty Co. v. City of St. Louis

    329 Mo. 972 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1932

    [Swift v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. 80, 95 , 79 S. W. 172 ; Asphalt Co. v. Hunt, 100 Mo. 22 , 13 S. W. 98 ; Paving Co. v. Field, 188 Mo. 182, 200 , 86 S. W. 860 .] … [Curtice v. Schmidt, 202 Mo. 703 , 101 S. W. 61 ; Swift v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. 80, 95 , 72 S. W. 172 ; Schoenberg V. Field, 95 Mo. App. 243 , 68 S. W. 945 ; Paving Co. v. McLord, 145 Mo. App. 141 , 130 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Dees

    276 S.W.2d 201 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1955

    State v. Noland, 111 Mo. 473, 486 , 19 S.W. 715, 717 ; State v. Brawley, Mo.Sup., 242 S.W.2d 564 . … State v. Noland, 111 Mo. 473 , 19 S.W. 715 ; State v. Baker, Mo.Sup., 285 S.W. 416 , 417. .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Meyer v. Woodbury

    321 Mo. 275 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 30, 1928

    The circuit court cannot by mandamus compel such board to act in a matter where the latter is vested with discretion. [State ex rel. v. Bolte, 151 Mo. 362 ; State ex rel. v. City of Willow Springs, 208 Mo. … The case of Daggett v. Hudson, 43 Ohio St. 548 , is cited.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ziegenhein v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

    117 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1893

    It is then made the duty of the state board to assess, adjust and equalize the valuation of all such property of each company, and in doing this the board has the power to assess, adjust and equalize “any other property” … Ewing v. Hoblitzselle, 85 Mo. 78 . Now article 8 of the general revenue law, relating to the assessment and taxation of railroads, was enacted by way of a revised bill at the revision of 1879.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Northwestern Bank

    290 Mo. 311 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1921

    [Bray v. Marshall, 75 Mo. 327 ; Noble v. Blount, 77 Mo. 235 ; Chance v. Jennings, 159 Mo. 544 ; Sanders v. Chartrand, 158 Mo. 352 ; Avery v. K.C. Southern Ry. Co., 113 Mo. 561 , 568; Throckmorton v. … Perry, 51 Mo. 449 ; Stagg v. Linnenfelser, 59 Mo. 336 ; Austn v. Loring, 63 Mo. 19 ; Acton v. Dooley, 74 Mo. 63 , 69; Blodgett v. Perry, 97 Mo. 263 , 273; Burke v. Adams, 80 Mo. 504 , 514; Monks v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • England v. Eckley

    330 S.W.2d 738 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959

    Wolfe v. Bronson, 115 Mo. 271 , 21 S.W. 1125, 1127 ; State ex rel. Kelleher v. Board of President & Directors of St. Louis Public Schools, 134 Mo. 296 , 35 S.W. 617, 619 . State ex rel. Townsend v. … Dahm v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

    72 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1880

    Joseph, and in Buchanan county, the brakeman, by signs, directed the plaintiff' to adjust some boards on a car, which boards were falling off; that while plaintiff was in the act of so adjusting said boards, one of them striking … Snyder v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co., 60 Mo. 413 ; Towanda Coal Co. v. Heeman, 86 Pa. St. 418.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Steffen v. City of St. Louis

    135 Mo. 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 16, 1896

    Louis v. Robinson, 55 Mo. App. 256 ; Kansas City v. Neal, 122 Mo. 232 ; Northcutt v. Eager, 132 Mo. 265 . II. … Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 389 ; Gamble v. Gibson, 83 Mo. 290 ; Lingenfelder v. Brewing Co., 103 Mo. 578 . We proceed then to examine the errors of law assigned by defendant.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Jasper

    324 Mo. 668 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 4, 1930

    said Brown. … [State v. Warden, 94 Mo. 648 , 8 S. W. 233 ; State v. Berkley, 92 Mo. 41 , 4 S. W. 24 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.