Case law

Spurr v. Spurr

285 Mo. 163 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1920

[Johnson v. Johnson, 170 Mo. l.c. 56.] … Brown and Small, CC., concur.

Press v. Penny

242 Mo. 98 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

BROWN, C. This cause is certified to this court from the St. … Different aspects of the same question are also interestingly discussed in the following cases: Long v. Moon, 107 Mo. 334 ; Crenshaw v. Ullman, 113 Mo. 633 ; Benjamin v. Railroad, 133 Mo. 274 ; Williamson v.

State v. Lawrence

178 Mo. 350 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1903

The Kansas City Court of Appeals in Kane & Co. v. School District of Calhoun, 48 Mo. … This court, in Johnson v.

Curators of the University of Missouri v. Public Service Employees Local No. 45

520 S.W.2d 54 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

Missouri State Board of Mediation, 478 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1972); and State ex rel. O’Leary v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 509 S.W.2d 84 (Mo. banc 1974). … City of Springfield v.

Aurora Water Co. v. City of Aurora

129 Mo. 540 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1895

This principle was recognized and declared in State ex rel. v. Walbridge, supra; see, also, City v. Schoenbusch, *579 95 Mo. 618 . … State ex rel. v. Mead, supra; Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. Hunt, supra; Rutherford v. Hamilton, 97 Mo. 543 . d.

State Ex Rel. Kramer v. Schwartz

336 Mo. 932 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 1935

Thus, in Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 195 Cal. 477 , and in Fowler v. … Furthermore, the persuasive authority of the case last noticed is impaired by the fact that it reliqs, at least in part, upon the cases of Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, and Fowler v.

King v. Priest

357 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1947

Brokaw v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (Mo. App), 171 S. W. (2d) 75 , 83. The first section-of the Declaratory Judgment Act, Sec. 1126 R. … Sec. 7711, supra.; American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 285 Mo. 581, 590 , 227 S. W. 114 ; State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. Louis, 174 Mo. 125, 131 , 73 S. W. 623 .

Thompson v. Ruddick

213 Mo. 561 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1908

Ruddick’s title originated in tax deeds, and in a quit-claim deed from the executors of the will of said William Brown. … [Stark v. Zehnder, 204 Mo. l. c. 448, et seq.; see also, Harding v. Bedoll, 202. Mo. l. c. 630; Pennowfsky v. Coerver, 205 Mo. l. c. 137.]

State v. Moody

312 S.W.2d 816 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1958

In support of his claim of insufficiency of the information, defendant cites State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 , 16 S.W. 406 ; State v. McLain, 159 Mo. 340 , 60 S.W. 736 ; State v. Smith, 174 Mo. 586 , 74 S.W. 624 ; State v. … Three of them (State v. Brown; State v. McLain and State v. Smith) are concerned with requirements of instructions. The contention defendant makes was specifically ruled in State v.

Phelps v. Fenix

345 Mo. 440 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 5, 1939

Ann., p. 3770), as construed by Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 , 142 S. … In the case of Gantt v. Brown, supra, 238 Mo. l. c. 566-568, 581, 142 S.

Witmer v. Nichols

320 Mo. 665 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1928

[Sparks v. Jasper County, 213 Mo. 218 , 112 S. W. 265 .] … [Winchester Electric Light Co. v Veal, 145 Ind. 506 ; 6 R. C. L. 829, sec. 220.] Whether this is such a case we will next consider.

State ex rel. Crow v. Harrison

141 Mo. 12 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897

Attorney-General v. Mayor, 143 Mass. 589 ; People v. Bush, 40 Cal. 344 . … Wood v. Peake, 8 Johns. 69 .

Baird v. St. Louis Hospital Ass'n

116 Mo. 419 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 6, 1893

Glasgow v. Baker, 85 Mo. 559 and cases cited. But it is insisted that the proviso excludes all claims from the operation of the act which had been confirmed by the board of commissioners. … Guitard v. Stoddard, 15 How. 512 ; Vasquez v. Ewing, 42 Mo. 247 .

Union Savings Ass'n v. Seligman

92 Mo. 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1887

Burgess v. Seligman, 107 U. S. 20 . … The cases of Upton v. Triblecock, 91 U. S. 45 ; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 56 , and Webster v. Upton, 91 U.

Neil v. Ridge

220 Mo. 233 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1909

It is sufficient to say of Menefee v. Bell in the 62 Mo. App., the taxbill was held valid. In McQuiddy v. Vineyard, supra, it was expressly ruled that there was no apportionment by the board of public works. … In Nee-nan v.

Rauch v. Himmelberger

305 Mo. 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1924

Points (2) and (3) are answered in Brieholz v. Board of Supervisors, 257 U. … S. 701, 708 ; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345 ; Embree v. Kansas City Road District, 240 U. S. 242, 250 ; Wagner v. Baltimore, 239 U. S. 207, 217, 218 ; Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U.

State Tax Commission v. Administrative Hearing Commission

641 S.W.2d 69 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1982

; State Board of Chiropody and Podiatry; State Board of Chiropractic Examiners; Missouri Dental Board; State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors; State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts; Division of Insurance … ; State Board of Nursing; State Board of Optometry; Board of Pharmacy; Missouri Real Estate Commission; Missouri Veterinary Medical Board; Supervisor of Liquor Control; Division of Health; and Department of Mental Health.

State v. Griffin

662 S.W.2d 854 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1983

In State v. … Co. v.

Sprague v. Sea

152 Mo. 327 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1899

In Straus v. … [Reardon v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 384 ; Wilkens v. Railroad, 101 Mo. loc. cit. 105; Baker v. Railroad, 122 Mo. loc. cit. 598; Francis v. Railroad, 127 Mo. loc. cit. 675; Hahn v. Dawson, 134 Mo. loc. cit. 591 and 592.]

Healy v. Kansas City

277 Mo. 619 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 28, 1919

Louis, 251 Mo. 624 ; Behrmann v. City of St. Louis, 273 Mo. 578 ; Trower v. City of Louisiana, 198 Mo. App. 352 ; Ulrich v. City of St. Louis, 112 Mo. 138 ; Bullmaster v. City of St. Joseph, 70 Mo. App. 60 ; Cassidy v. … [Heller v. Sedalia, 53 Mo. 159 ; Cunningham v. Seattle, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 629, note; 4 Dillon on Mun. Corp. sec. 1660; Trower v. City of Louisiana, 198 Mo. App. l. c. 368-9, and cases cited on 370-1; Jolly’s Admx. v.