Case law

Mead v. Jasper County

322 Mo. 1191 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1929

Louis County v. Sparks, 10 Mo. 117 , 45 Am. … The Sparks case was approved and the rule therein stated applied by this court en banc in State ex inf. v. Lamar, 291 S.W. 457 . In State ex rel. v. Bird et al. (Mo.), 244 S.W. 938 , State v.

Courtney v. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corp.

346 Mo. 703 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 4, 1940

, and a top was over the board walls on the second floor. … [See also Evansville Ice Storage Co. v. Fidelity Cas. Co., 61 Ind. App. 194 , 111 N.E. 812 ; Western Warehouse Co. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 85 Or. 597 , 167 P. 572 ; Home Mixture Guano Co. v.

Green City v. Martin

237 Mo. 474 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 27, 1911

[Manwaring v. Lumber Company, 200 Mo. 718 ; Clark v. Railroad, 219 Mo. 524 , et seq.] Counsel for defendant, under this head, cite us to two cases relating to taxes and apparently running on all-fours. [State ex rel. v. … Thompson, 41 Mo. 25 ; State ex rel. v. Ferguson, 62 Mo. 77 .]

Rauch v. Himmelberger

305 Mo. 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1924

Points (2) and (3) are answered in Brieholz v. Board of Supervisors, 257 U. … S. 701, 708 ; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345 ; Embree v. Kansas City Road District, 240 U. S. 242, 250 ; Wagner v. Baltimore, 239 U. S. 207, 217, 218 ; Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U.

State v. Hawkins

619 S.W.2d 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981

See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v. … Martin, 610 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District in Missouri v. Brown, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1735 , 68 L.Ed.2d 222 (1981). See State v.

Funkhouser v. Hantz

29 Mo. 540 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860

The opinion of the court in the case of Sigerson v. Dent disposes of the main question in this case. The entry of Merlin in 1847 must yield to the title of Carondelet based upon the survey of 1834. … Tibbatts, of the House of Representatives, of February 14, 1846, Brown’s survey is ordered to stand and not to be interfered with, except some law of Congress should so authorize.

Connoyer v. Washington University

36 Mo. 481 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1865

Had the board confirmed the claim as presented before them by Louis Labeaume, there could be little doubt, under the decision in Bissell v. Penrose, (8 How., U. … The cases of Bissell v. Penrose, (8 How., U. S., 317,) and Boon v.

Nagel v. Barrett

353 Mo. 1049 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1945

Preiss et al. v. Seibel, County Clerk, supra, l. c. 295. … Preiss et al. v. Seibel, County Clerk, supra, l. c. 294.

State v. Thompson

318 Mo. 623 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1927

Brown. She accepted the check and handed defendant the change. She knew the defendant; knew he was not Brown. *625 Upon presentation of this check to the hank payment was refused and notation made, “No account.” … [State v. Cordray, 200 Mo. l. c. 31; State v. Jackson, 221 Mo. l. c. 504-505.] The check is attached to the record. A photostatic copy, enlarged, is attached to the briefs.

State ex rel. School District v. Gordon

223 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1909

In State v. … Canton v.

State v. Lawrence

178 Mo. 350 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1903

The Kansas City Court of Appeals in Kane & Co. v. School District of Calhoun, 48 Mo. … This court, in Johnson v.

State v. Clark

981 S.W.2d 143 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1998

State v. Nicklasson, 967 S.W.2d 596, 611 (Mo. banc 1998), citing Morgan, supra; Brown, 547 S.W.2d at 800 . … E.g., Morford v. United States, 339 U.S. 258 , 70 S.Ct. 586 , 94 L.Ed. 815 (1950); Brown, 547 S.W.2d at 805 ; Finch, 746 S.W.2d at 613 ; State v. Hoelscher, 217 Mo.App. 156 , 273 S.W. 1100 (Mo.App.1925).

Curators of the University of Missouri v. Public Service Employees Local No. 45

520 S.W.2d 54 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

Missouri State Board of Mediation, 478 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1972); and State ex rel. O’Leary v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 509 S.W.2d 84 (Mo. banc 1974). … City of Springfield v.

State ex rel. Hand v. Bilyeu

351 S.W.2d 457 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1961

School District of City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri v. Holman, Mo., 349 S.W.2d 945 , No. 49009. … Wagster v. Consolidated School District No. 4C of Dunklin County, 240 Mo.App. 91 , 213 S.W.2d 271 , affirmed 358 Mo. 839 , 217 S.W.2d 500, 1 . c. 502(2).

Bowen v. Hixon

45 Mo. 340 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1870

The People v. … . * * * The board has dis *344 solved. Were tbe same individuals again to convene, they would not again constitute tbe board o£ county canvassers.

State ex rel. Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Pulliam

233 Mo. 229 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1911

Article 1 of chapter 149, referred to in section 8546, gave no power to the-board to add omitted property. [State ex rel. v. Cunningham, 153 Mo. 652 .] … [City of Jefferson v. Whipple, 71 Mo. 520 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 5 .] Y.

State Ex Rel. Kramer v. Schwartz

336 Mo. 932 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 1935

Thus, in Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 195 Cal. 477 , and in Fowler v. … Furthermore, the persuasive authority of the case last noticed is impaired by the fact that it reliqs, at least in part, upon the cases of Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, and Fowler v.

Plefka v. Knapp, Stout & Co.

145 Mo. 316 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

judgment of the circuit court, in an opinion written by Judge Bond and concurred in by Judge Bland of that court, was affirmed, Judge Biggs dissenting and deeming the opinion in conflict with the following cases: Helfenstein v. … Medart, 136 Mo. 595 ; Fugler v. Bothe, 117 Mo. 475 ; Bradley v. Railroad, 138 Mo. 293 ; Lucey v. Hannibal Oil Co., 129 Mo. 32 ; Devitt v. Railroad, 50 Mo. 302 ; Ellingson v. Railroad, 60 Mo.

King v. Priest

357 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1947

Brokaw v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (Mo. App), 171 S. W. (2d) 75 , 83. The first section-of the Declaratory Judgment Act, Sec. 1126 R. … Sec. 7711, supra.; American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 285 Mo. 581, 590 , 227 S. W. 114 ; State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. Louis, 174 Mo. 125, 131 , 73 S. W. 623 .

State v. Moody

312 S.W.2d 816 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1958

In support of his claim of insufficiency of the information, defendant cites State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 , 16 S.W. 406 ; State v. McLain, 159 Mo. 340 , 60 S.W. 736 ; State v. Smith, 174 Mo. 586 , 74 S.W. 624 ; State v. … Three of them (State v. Brown; State v. McLain and State v. Smith) are concerned with requirements of instructions. The contention defendant makes was specifically ruled in State v.