Case law

Streeter v. Hundley

580 S.W.2d 283 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1979

Kraus v. Board of Educ. of Jennings, 492 S.W.2d 783, 786 (Mo.1973); State ex rel. Beaty v. Randall, 79 Mo.App. 226 (1899); Deskins v. Gose, 85 Mo. 485 (1885); King v. Jefferson City School Board, 71 Mo. 628 (1880). … If such violations come within the terms of § 168.-221.3, RSMo 1969, the Board could have held him accountable. In Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools, Mt. Vernon v.

State ex inf. Crow v. Kramer

47 L.R.A. 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1899

Brown v. Boden, 51 N. J. L. 114, it was held that after the town committee had ordered a special election, it could not reconsider its action and settle the tie by electing one of those having an equal number of votes. … In Kentucky the statute requires the examining boards in the state, district and county elections, to cast lots in case of a tie vote. In Hammock v.

Drey v. State Tax Commission

345 S.W.2d 228 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

Koplar v. State Tax Commission, supra. … Bank v. Schlotzhauer, supra.

Whiteaker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

252 Mo. 438 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1913

[Lanning v. Railroad, 196 Mo. 1 . c. 656 et seq.; Stotler v. Railroad, 200 Mo. 1 . c. 117 et seq.; Johnson v. Railways, 203 Mo. 1 . c. 398 et seq.; State ex rel. v. … It is so ordered. . . *463 Graves, Brown, Bond and Faris, JJ., concur; Woodson and Walker, JJ., dissent, Woodson, J., in an opinion filed.

Marshall Ex Rel. Marshall v. Kansas City

297 Mo. 304 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1923

The board walk in controvery complied with the above requirement, and was not defective. In Ely v. St. … V.

Elting v. Hickman

172 Mo. 237 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1903

In Lynch v. … [State ex rel. v. Wofford, 121 Mo. 61 ; State ex rel. v. Yancy, 123 Mo. 391 ; Spaulding v. Brady, 128 Mo. 653 ; State ex rel. v. Higgins, 125 Mo. 364 .]

Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. Blunt

799 S.W.2d 824 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1990

State v. Burns, 351 Mo. 163 , 172 S.W.2d 259, 266 (1943); Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 662 (banc 1942). … Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d at 662 .

In re Ver Dught

825 S.W.2d 847 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1992

In 1979, she divorced Brown, who died four years later, and upon divorce retook her maiden name. … [[Image here]] Q: Now, Vera, your last name now is Gilmore, but at the time in Oregon you were married to David Brown? That was your husband? A: Yes, I was married to David Brown. I was married for 31 years.

City of St. Louis v. Moore

269 Mo. 430 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1916

In 1894 the board of education of the city of St. … Y.) 332; McCullough v. Board of Education, 51 Cal. 418 ; In re Milwaukee Southern R. R., 124 Wis. 490 .

Britton v. School District of University City

328 Mo. 1185 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1931

Louis Safe Deposit Bank v. Kennett Est., 101 Mo. App. 370 , 74 S. W. 474 ; Spahr v. Cape, 143 Mo. App. 114 , 122 S. W. 379 ; Improvement Co. v. Strauch, 162 Mo. App. 76 , 149 S. W. 1159 ; Miller v. Klein, 177 Mo. … [Peters v. Buckner, 232 S. W. 1024, 1027 .]

Tittman v. Green

108 Mo. 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Citing Myers v. Wade, 6 Rand. 444 ; Swope v. Chambers, 2 Gratt. 319 . … In Gilmer v.

State v. Mischanko

272 S.W.2d 210 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1954

Brown informed the court and the defendant that he was withdrawing. “The Court: Mr. Brown, did you tell the man that you weren’t going to represent him? “Mr. … Betts v. Brady, supra; Foster v. People of State of Illinois, supra; Bute v. People of State of Illinois, supra; Skiba v. Kaiser, supra.

State v. Richardson

194 Mo. 326 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906

Defendant denied that any one used a board that night, but said that they tried to use it. … Ev., see. 680; Com. v. Walker, 13 Allen 570 ; U. S. v. Brown, 4 Cranch (C. C.) 508; Com. v. Kenney, 12 Metc. 235 ; Rex v. Appleby, 3 Starkie 33; Bob v. State, 32 Ala. 560 .] To the same effect is case of State v.

State Ex Rel. American Central Insurance v. Gehner

315 Mo. 1126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1926

Co. v. St. Louis, 270 Mo. 40 ; State ex rel. Karrenbrock v. Trust Co., 209 Mo. l. c. 490; Carondelet v. Picot, 38 Mo. 130 .] … In a general sense this is true (State ex rel. v. Board of Equalization, 256 Mo. l. c. 463), but not, in the circumstances of this case, in the sense in which respondents employ the term.

State Ex Rel. Kahler v. State Tax Commission

393 S.W.2d 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1965

This is an appeal by William V. … Stein v. State Tax Commission, supra. In State ex rel. Platz v.

Kalbfell v. Wood

193 Mo. 675 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1906

In Casey v. … [Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251 ; California v. Railroad, 149 U.

State Ex Rel. Dreer v. Public School Retirement System

519 S.W.2d 290 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1975

See Hickey v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 363 Mo. 1039 , 256 S.W.2d 775 (1953). … See also 60 Am.Jur.2d 909, Pensions and Retirement Funds, § 39; Voigt v. Board of Education, 413 Ill. 233 , 108 N.E.2d 426 (1952). Appellant has cited several cases which deserve distinction. In State ex rel. Phillip v.

King v. Priest

357 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1947

Brokaw v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (Mo. App), 171 S. W. (2d) 75 , 83. The first section-of the Declaratory Judgment Act, Sec. 1126 R. … Sec. 7711, supra.; American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 285 Mo. 581, 590 , 227 S. W. 114 ; State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. Louis, 174 Mo. 125, 131 , 73 S. W. 623 .

State Ex Rel. Kramer v. Schwartz

336 Mo. 932 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 1935

Thus, in Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 195 Cal. 477 , and in Fowler v. … Furthermore, the persuasive authority of the case last noticed is impaired by the fact that it reliqs, at least in part, upon the cases of Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, and Fowler v.

State Ex Rel. Marlowe v. Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co.

332 Mo. 379 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 16, 1933

In Harrington v. … [Harrington v. Hopkins, 288 Mo. 1 , 10, 231 S.W. 263 ; Jacobs v. Cauthorn, 293 Mo. 154 , 238 S.W. 443 ; Peter v.