Case law

State v. Hayzlett

265 S.W.2d 321 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

State' v. Shuls, *324 supra; State v. Snyder, 182 Mo. 462 , 82 S.W. 12; State v. Robinson, Mo., 184 S.W.2d 1017 . In State v. … Now, if Brown did not do anything, and you must say that Brown was there; that is the only testimony you have here,; he must have .'

State Ex Rel. Neu, Jr. v. Waechter

332 Mo. 574 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1933

Dunn v. Coburn, 260 Mo. 177 , 168 S. … Haller v. Arnold, supra, 277 Mo. 474 , 210 S.

Nelson v. Watkinson

260 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1953

Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. Evans, 238 Mo. 599 , 142 S.W. 319 ; Yeomans v. Herrick, 178 Mo.App. 274 , 165 S.W. 1112, 1113 ; Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co., 263 Mo. 719 , 173 S.W. 674 . … Wolf v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 304 Mo. 459 , 263 S.W. 846, 847, 848 . See also Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co., 263 Mo. 719 , 173 S.W. 674 ; Finley *3 v.

State v. Jones

716 S.W.2d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 16, 1986

State v. Brown, 636 S.W.2d 929, 933 (Mo. banc 1982). … State v. Brown, supra , sustained a challenge to the facial constitutionality of the "rape shield law," § 491.015, RSMo 1978.

McCoy v. Caldwell County

145 S.W.3d 427 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 12, 2004

Phillips v. Fallen, 6 S.W.3d 862, 864 (Mo. banc 1999). … Luethans v. Washington University, 894 S.W.2d 169, 172 (Mo. banc 1995).

City of St. Louis v. Whitman Agricultural Co.

235 Mo. 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1911

Louis v. St. … We said in the Blast Furnace case all that we have to say in respect of the effect of the Brown’s survey and we have now nothing to add. The trial court decided that under the evidence adduced the city of St.

Howsmon v. Trenton Water Co.

23 L.R.A. 146 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1893

Ellis v. Harrison, 104 Mo. 270 ; State ex rel. v. Gas Light Co., 102 Mo. 472 ; Fitsgerald v. Barker, 70 Mo. 685 ; Rogers v. Gosnell, 58 Mo. 589 ; Rogers v. Gosnell, 51 Mo, 466; Meyer v. Lowell, 44 Mo. 328 ; Robbins v. … Simson v. Brown, 68 N. Y. 355 ; Vrooman v. Turner, 69 N. Y. 280 ; Wright v. Terry, 23 Flor. 160 ; Austin v. Seligman, 18 Fed. Rep. 519; Burton v. Larkin, 36 Kan. 246 , and cases cited.

State Ex Rel. Hart v. City of St. Louis

356 Mo. 820 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1947

Mulvoy v. Miller et al., 315 Mo. 41 , 285 S. … School District No. 11 v. Lauderbaugh, 80 Mo. 190 ; State ex rel. Dick & Bros. Quincy Brewery Co. v. Quincy, O. & K. C. R. Co., 199 Mo. App. 668 , 204 S. W. 584 ; State ex rel Mills et al. v. Turnage et al., 217 Mo.

State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. Edwards

305 Mo. 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 21, 1924

To justify their invocation of such *435 remedy, relators rely upon State ex rel. v. Holtcamp, 267 Mo. 412 ; State ex rel. v. Roach, 230 Mo. 408 ; State ex rel. v. Guinotte, 113 Mo. App. 399 , and State ex rel. v. … [Ely v. St. Louis, supra; Kansas City v. Hyde, supra.]

State ex rel. Wenneker v. Cummings

151 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1899

In Gray v. … Co. v. Charles, 47 Mo. 462 ; Railroad v. Maguire, 49 Mo. 482 ; State ex rel. v. Hoyt, 128 Mo. 848 ; State ex rel. v. Seahorn, 139 Mo. loc. cit. 609 ; Cooley on Taxation (2 Ed.), 609-748. III.

Schneider v. State Tax Commission

319 S.W.2d 535 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1958

Louis assessed the strip of ground, a roadway through an industrial area, at $80,990; upon review the Board of Equalization determined its tax valuation to be $60,420 and accordingly assessed the property. … Brinck v. Collier, supra; Mulik v. Jorganian, supra; Connell v. Jersey Realty & Investment Co., supra.

River Rendering Co. v. Behr

77 Mo. 91 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1882

It was so ruled by the New York court of appeals in Underwood v. Green, 42 N. Y. 140 . … A similar question was passed upon by this court in Lowry v.

City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank

351 Mo. 688 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 7, 1943

Dist. v. St. L., I. M. &. S. Ry., 264 Ill. 640, 643-5 , 106 N. E. 490 ; City of Chicago v. Kemp, 240 Ill. 56, 58 , 88 N. E. 284 ; City of Waukegan v. Burnett, 234 Ill. 460, 461 , 84 N. … W. (2d) 94, 95 (2); Simms v. Thompson, 291 Mo. 493, 515 , 236 S. W. 876, 883 .; Jeude v. Simms, 258 Mo. 26, 40 , 166 S. W. 1048, 1052 (4); State v. Stanley, 225 Mo. 525, 531 , 125 S. W. 475, 476 (1); Townsend v.

King v. City of St. Louis

250 Mo. 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

In Goble v. Kansas City, 148 Mo. l. c. 475 et seq., it was ruled one way, and in Charlton v. … [Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. l. c. 71 et seq.] This it did not do.

Sanders v. City of St. Louis

303 S.W.2d 925 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1957

Kirby v. Nolte, 351 Mo. 525 , 173 S.W.2d 391 ; Kirby v. Nolte, 349 Mo. 1015 , 164 S.W.2d 1 ; City of St. Louis v. Smith, 360 Mo. 406 , 228 S.W.2d 780 . … Louis v. Smith, supra.

State ex rel. Knipschild v. Bellamy

615 S.W.2d 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 6, 1981

Before such claims could be *39 filed in any court, plaintiffs were required to first travel through a detailed Board “review” process. In our decision of State ex rel. Cardinal Glennon Memorial Hospital v. … Crane v. Riehn, 568 S.W.2d 525 (Mo. banc 1978); Kausch v. Bishop, 568 S.W.2d 532 (Mo. banc 1978).

State Ex Rel. Young v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

348 Mo. 1180 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1941

Johnson v. Merchants' Miners' Bank, 279 Mo. 228 , 213 S.W. 815 ; State ex rel. Arnold v. McCune (Mo.), 252 S.W. 657 ; State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. … [Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust Savings Co. v. Hill, 323 Mo. 180 , 19 S.W.2d 746 .] The final assessment judgment may also be reviewed by certiorari on the record proper before the Board. [State ex rel. City of St. Louis v.

In re Ver Dught

825 S.W.2d 847 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1992

In 1979, she divorced Brown, who died four years later, and upon divorce retook her maiden name. … [[Image here]] Q: Now, Vera, your last name now is Gilmore, but at the time in Oregon you were married to David Brown? That was your husband? A: Yes, I was married to David Brown. I was married for 31 years.

State Ex Rel. Winkle Terra Cotta Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

322 Mo. 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1929

In Hull v. Mass. Bonding Ins. … In Ruhe v. Buck, 124 Mo. 178 , 183, 27 S.W. 412 , Judge GANTT quoted approvingly from Scudder v.

State ex inf. Nixon v. Corley

896 S.W.2d 931 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1995

V, § 3. The judgment is reversed and remanded. I. Michael Corley became a member of the Rockwood School District Board of Education (the Board) on April 12, 1993. … Fulton v. City of Lockwood, 269 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1954); State ex rel. School District of Affton v. Smith, 336 Mo. 703 , 80 S.W.2d 858 (1935); and Williams v.