Case law

City of St. Louis v. Meyrose Lamp Manufacturing Co.

139 Mo. 560 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1897

Louis v. Knox, 74 Mo. 79 , a similar ordinance was held valid, requiring application for a license for the sale of horses, etc., to be made through the board of police commissioners. So, also, in St. Louis v. … Flickinger v. Fisher, 119 Mo. 344 . With regard to doctors, this court has sustained the legal force and effect of the statute. State v. Hathaway, 115 Mo. 36 .

Matthews v. Hunter

67 Mo. 293 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

Brown, to whom, after an approval of said sale by said court, he executed a deed therefor. … (Carlisle’s Adm’r v. Mulhern et al., 19 Mo. 57 ; Duhring v. Duhring, 20 Mo. 184 .)

Fulton v. City of Lockwood

269 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

Board of Public Works of Rolla v. Sho-Me Power Corp., 362 Mo. 730 , 244 S.W.2d 55, 60 [5]; Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. City of New Madrid, Mo.App., 185 S.W.2d 850 , 853[7]; Haskins v. … to prove what the" board actually did * * State ex rel.

Johnson v. School District

67 Mo. 319 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1878

The Supreme Court of Iowa in Taylor v. … See also Clark v. School Directors, 78 Ill. 474 ; Cheeney v. The Inhabitants of Brookfield, 60 Mo. 58 .

Rehm v. Alber

272 Mo. 452 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1917

'Since 1909, and before that time, plaintiff says he commenced boarding with Mrs. Alber and paid his board regularly every week. He claims to have bought the lot in suit in 1884. … [Barrett v. Foote, 187 S. W. (Mo.) l. c. 70; Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Kuhlmann, 238 Mo. l. c. 697; Cole v. Cole, 231 Mo. 236 ; Bank v. Fry, 216 Mo. l. c. 45.]

Cantwell v. Columbia Lead Co.

199 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1906

It was announced as early as 1857, in Potter v. Adams, 24 Mo. 159 , and has been steadily applied. [State ex rel. v. McKee, 150 Mo. l. c. 238; Cunningham v. Railroad, 165 Mo. l. c. 278, et seq.; State v. … Nave, 185 Mo. l. c. 135; Eudaley v. Railroad, 186 Mo. 399 ; Guy v. Railroad, 197 Mo. 174 ; Bowring v. Railroad, 90 Mo. App. l. c. 327.]

State ex rel. Lathrop v. Dowling

50 Mo. 134 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1872

The action of the board of appeals is judicial in its nature, and this is the proper mode of reviewing its proceedings. (Lee’s Adm’r v. St. Louis County Court, 47 Mo. 594 .) 2. … (Lionberger v. Rowse, 43 Mo. 67 ; First National Bank v. Meredith, 44 Mo. 500 .) 4.

Lee v. Liberty Bell Oil Co.

291 S.W.2d 132 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 1950

The evidence did not show where the Brown car was ’at this time. It was an admitted fact, however, that the Brown car and the oil truck came into collision hear the point where plaintiff’s car was stopped. … Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 244 S.W.2d 10 , loc. cit. 14, 15(4, 5) ; Douglas v. Twenter, Mo., 259 S.W.2d 353 , loc. cit. 359(7-9) (10).

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Conrad

310 S.W.2d 871 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1958

Wabash Railroad Co. v. … In Liddle v.

State Ex Rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Ferriss

304 S.W.2d 896 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1957

Board of Education of City of St. Louis v. St. Louis [ 267 Mo. 356 , 184 S.W. 975 ], supra. … Helsel v. Board of County Commissioners, Ohio Com.Pl. 1947, 79 N.E.2d 698 ; Great Neck Community School v. Dick, Sup. 1955, 140 N.Y.S.2d 221 , 222; Aviation Services, Inc. v.

City of St. Louis v. Gleason

89 Mo. 67 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

In Young v. St. … Until such action was taken by the board of public works, or the owners of the ground, there was no authority in the assembly to pass the ordinance. The case of City of St. Louis v.

Perryman v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

326 Mo. 176 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 4, 1930

[Kaminski v. Tudor Iron Works, 167 Mo. l. c. 466; Longan v. Weltmer, 180 Mo. l. c. 340.]” … [Maginnis v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 168 Mo. 667 , 187 S. W. 1165, 1167 .] Witness O. D. Brown was never called by plaintiff and testified.only as a witness for defendant.

State ex rel. Connor v. City of St. Louis

158 Mo. 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1900

In State ex rel. v. … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 ; State ex rel. v. State Board of Health, 103 Mo. 22 ; State ex rel. v. Oliver, 116 Mo. 188 .] The judgment of the circuit court is reversed.

State ex rel. McGrath v. Walker

97 Mo. 162 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

But for such independent provision they would not have been members of such board. … A different conclusion from that above indicated was announced in State ex rel. v.

State v. Arnold

628 S.W.2d 665 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1982

V, § 10. … BROWN: Your Honor, I will again object to that in the same— (Counsel approached the bench.) MR.

Amick v. Pattonville-Bridgeton Terrace Fire Protection District

91 S.W.3d 603 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 2002

Const. article V, section 10. Reversed and remanded. The parties agree that the district is protected by sovereign immunity. Light v. Lang, 539 S.W.2d 795, 800 (Mo.App.1976); see Richardson v. … For the same reason and to the same extent Browning by Browning v. White, 940 S.W.2d 914, 920 (Mo.App.1997), and Balderree v. Beeman, 837 S.W.2d 309, 319 (Mo.App.1992), are overruled.

State Ex Rel. Lindell Tower Apartments, Inc. v. Guise

357 Mo. 50 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1947

McLeod Lumber Co. v. Baker et al., 170 Mo. 194 , 70 S. W. 470 , 472. … of the board.

Horgan v. Brady

155 Mo. 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1900

[Trig v. Taylor, 27 Mo. 245 ; Walker v. Owen, 79 Mo. 563 ; Tomlinson v. Ellison, 104. Mo. 105; Hart v. Leete, 104 Mo. 315 ; Minton v. Steele, 125 Mo. 181 .] … [Loomis v. Railroad, 17 Mo. App. 340 ; Waller v. Railroad, 59 Mo. App. 410 ; Johnson-Brinkman Co. v. Central Bank, 116 Mo. 558 ; Sprague v. Sea, 152 Mo. 327 .]

Consolidated School District No. 2 v. O'Malley

343 Mo. 1187 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1939

Palmer et al. v. Elliff et al., 58 S. W. (2d) 283, 284 ; Richter v. Rodgers et al., 327 Mo. 543 , 37 S. W. (2d) 523 ; State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Gordon et al., 327 Mo. 160 , 36 S. W. (2d) 105 .] I. … Even so, the quoted part of Section 9333 provides that the board of education of a consolidated school district shall perform the same duties as the boards of school districts acting under the general school law.

Hill v. Gould

129 Mo. 106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1895

Ward v. Davidson, 89 Mo. 445 . … The contract between Brown and J.