Case law

State v. Doerring

194 Mo. 398 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906

In Ewing v. … [State v. Little, 76 Mo. 52 .] V.

Parkway School District v. Parkway Ass'n of Education, Support Personnel, Local 902/MNEA

807 S.W.2d 63 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 9, 1991

We granted the union’s application for transfer because of the important issues raised by the board’s departure from the position it took in Missouri Nat. Educ. Ass’n. v. … O’Leary v.

State v. Jackson

373 S.W.2d 4 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1963

State v. Parrish, Mo., 214 S.W.2d 558 . … State v. Baird, 288 Mo. 62 , 231 S.W. 625, 627 , 15 A.L.R. 1035 ; State v. Brown, Mo., 62 S.W.2d 426 , 427; State v. Fowler, Mo., 189 S.W.2d 549 , 550-551; State v. Terry, Mo., 325 S.W.2d 1, 8 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. American Central Insurance v. Reynolds

289 Mo. 382 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 19, 1921

The same principle is announced in the following cases: Fulton v. Fisher, 239 Mo. l.c. 131; Lincoln Trust Co. v. Nathan, 175 Mo. l.c. 42, 74 S.W. l.c. 1008; Mathiason v. St. Louis, 156 Mo. l.c. 200; Joyce v. … of James v.

State ex rel. McGrath v. Walker

97 Mo. 162 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1888

But for such independent provision they would not have been members of such board. … A different conclusion from that above indicated was announced in State ex rel. v.

Black v. State

151 S.W.3d 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 2004

See also Deck, 68 S.W.3d at 426 ; State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 295 (Mo. banc 1995). … See Lagud v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, 136 S.W.3d 786 (Mo. banc 2004) (prior admission of suspect impeaching his own trial testimony as to his intoxication could not by its nature be cumulative).

McCullough v. Newton

348 S.W.2d 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1961

The work of grading the land, removing timber, and draining and filling the pond proceeded promptly, at a cost of approximately $2,700 to Brown and Hilderhof. … See Katz v. Dreyfoos, Mo.App., 26 S.W.2d 999 , 1001, and cases cited; Stout v. Edwards, Mo.App., 210 S.W. 128 , 129.

State v. Henderson

186 Mo. 473 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1905

After Brown and defendant reached Wentzville that night, and before defendant was arrested, Brown took defendant to Ball’s livery stable, and there defendant repeated his confession to Brown and Mr. … Ball substantially as he had made it to Brown. Brown and Ball both testified they did not threaten defendant nor make him any promises.

Fox v. Courtney

111 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1892

Browne on Statutes *151 of Frauds, sec. 385; Fry on Specific Performance of Contracts, sec. 328; Moore v. Mountcastle, 61 Mo. 425 ; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 57 Mo. 75 ; Schroeder v. Taaffe, 11 Mo. App. 267 ; Clark v. … Fry on Specific Performance of Contracts, sec. 329; Rumble v. Heygate, 18 W. R. 749; Jenkins v. Green, 27 Beav. 437.

State Ex Rel. Eagleton v. Hughes

355 Mo. 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1946

Kilker v. Huffman, and others, constituting the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis, reported in 187 S. W. (2d) 850 . … That power is vested exclusively in the board of trustees. State ex rel. Lambert v. Flynn, [ 348 Mo. 525 ], 154 S. W. 2d 52 , loc. cit. 54.” State ex rel. Cook v. Glassco et al., Mo. App., 161 S. W. 2d 438, 440 .

State ex rel. Heaven v. Ziegenhein

144 Mo. 283 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1898

Leete v. Bank, 115 Mo. 184 -195, and cases cited. The act, however, is in all essential features simply a “pension law,” and is properly so-called. … In Mead v. Inhabitants, 1 N. E.

Deaner v. Bi-State Development Agency

484 S.W.2d 232 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1972

McConnell v. Pic-Walsh Freight Co. (Mo.Sup.), 432 S.W.2d 292, 301 ; Skadal v. Brown (Mo.Sup.), 351 S.W.2d 684, 689-690 ; Jones v. Pennsylvania R. … Appellate courts cannot find bias and prejudice solely from excessiveness of verdict, McConnell v. Pic-Walsh Freight Co., supra; Skadal v. Brown, supra.

City of St. Louis v. Tiefel

42 Mo. 578 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1868

(People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 495 ; Morford v. Unger, 8 Iowa, 82 ; Whiting v. Mount Pleasant, 11 Iowa, 482 ; Supervisors v. People, 25 Ill. 181 ; Clinton v. Draper, 14 Ind. 295 ; Successors of Lanzetti, 9 La. An. 329.) … Co. v. Potts, 7 Ind. 681 ; State v. Powers, 14 Ind. 195 .)

Noonan v. Walsh

364 Mo. 1169 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1954

Castello v. St. Louis Circuit Court, 28 Mo. 259 ; Bowen v. Hixon, 45 Mo. 340 ; State ex rel. Kaysing v. Ryan, supra; State ex rel. Addison v. … In some respects the duties of the board, as well as the duties of the circuit court in general term, may be ministerial, State ex rel. Donnell v.

Hatfield v. Thompson

252 S.W.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1952

Their testimony also was that the manner in which plaintiff attempted to board No. 62 was the usual and customary manner in which experienced trainmen boarded moving trains and that an experienced trainman could safely board … See Taylor v. Lumaghi Coal Co., and Griffith v. Gardner, both supra.

State Ex Rel. Wulfing v. Mooney

362 Mo. 1128 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1952

Hollman v. McElhinney et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 315 Mo. 731 , 286 S.W. 951 , the board of election commissioners in St. … Bates v. Remmers et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 325 Mo. 1175 , 30 S.W. 2d 609 , the board was attempting to print the name of Sylvester A.

Consolidated School District No. 2 v. O'Malley

343 Mo. 1187 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1939

Palmer et al. v. Elliff et al., 58 S. W. (2d) 283, 284 ; Richter v. Rodgers et al., 327 Mo. 543 , 37 S. W. (2d) 523 ; State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Gordon et al., 327 Mo. 160 , 36 S. W. (2d) 105 .] I. … Even so, the quoted part of Section 9333 provides that the board of education of a consolidated school district shall perform the same duties as the boards of school districts acting under the general school law.

Graybar Electric Co. v. Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union

365 Mo. 753 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1956

Labor Board, 1955); Your Food Stores v. … v.

City of St. Louis v. Meyrose Lamp Manufacturing Co.

139 Mo. 560 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1897

Louis v. Knox, 74 Mo. 79 , a similar ordinance was held valid, requiring application for a license for the sale of horses, etc., to be made through the board of police commissioners. So, also, in St. Louis v. … Flickinger v. Fisher, 119 Mo. 344 . With regard to doctors, this court has sustained the legal force and effect of the statute. State v. Hathaway, 115 Mo. 36 .

Dritt v. Snodgrass

66 Mo. 286 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

Murphy v. … In Weaver v.