Case law

State Ex Rel. Wulfing v. Mooney

362 Mo. 1128 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1952

Hollman v. McElhinney et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 315 Mo. 731 , 286 S.W. 951 , the board of election commissioners in St. … Bates v. Remmers et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 325 Mo. 1175 , 30 S.W. 2d 609 , the board was attempting to print the name of Sylvester A.

Hodges v. City of St. Louis

217 S.W.3d 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 2007

Martin filed a personal injury suit against Walker, the City, and the Board of Police Commissioners (Board). Martin died in January 2005. … V, sec. 3. . Rizzo v. State, 189 S.W.3d 576, 578 (Mo. banc 2006). . Maldonado v. Gateway Hotel Holdings, L.L.C., 154 S.W.3d 303, 307 (Mo.App.2003). . Nemani v. St. Louis University, 33 S.W.3d 184, 185 (Mo. banc 2000). .

Rogers v. Poteet

355 Mo. 986 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1947

For that reason also, the Union executive board merely ordered its members at the two plants to stop “any two” non-union haulers. … Browning (Div. 1), 260 Mo. 324, 344-51 , 168 S. W. 934, 938-40 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co. (Div. 1), 350 Mo. 831, 835 , 168 S. W. (2d) 1083, 1086 (2-4). 3 Dietrich v. Cape Brewing & Ice Co.

Dritt v. Snodgrass

66 Mo. 286 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

Murphy v. … In Weaver v.

Streett v. LaClede-Christy Company

409 S.W.2d 691 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1966

Mitchell v. Lewensohn, [ 251 Wis. 424 ], 29 N.W.2d 748 ; Shiller [Schiller] v. Keuffel & Esser Company [ 21 Wis.2d 545 ], 124 N.W.2d 646 . … Osadchuk v. Gordon, [ 251 Mass. 540 ], 146 N.E. 781 .”

Graybar Electric Co. v. Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union

365 Mo. 753 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1956

Labor Board, 1955); Your Food Stores v. … v.

Russell v. Frank

348 Mo. 533 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1941

[Bueker v. Aufderheide, 345 Mo. 833 , 136 S. W. (2d) 281 ; Mays v. Jackson, 346 Mo. 1224 , 145 S. W. (2d) 392 .] … Co. v. Mechanics’ Savings Bank & Trust Co., 72 Fed. 413 , 19 C. C. A. 286 (opinion by Taft, Cir. J.); Kellogg v. Clyne, 54 Fed. 696 , 4 C. C. A. 554 ; Foster v. Hall, 29 Mass. 89 ; Brownell v. Briggs (Mass.), 54 N.

State v. Wilkerson

616 S.W.2d 829 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1981

Appellant relies upon State v. Brown, 547 S.W.2d 797, 798 (Mo. banc 1977), which is distinguishable from the case at bar. … State v. Brown, 547 *836 S.W.2d 797, 799 (Mo. banc 1977), and MAI-CR 2.04 Notes on Use, paragraph 2. In State v.

Boonville National Bank v. Schlotzhauer

317 Mo. 1298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 27, 1927

But we have upheld these orders of boards of equalization, as against collateral attack, upon the theory that-they were as court judgments. [See *1309 Slate ex rel. Johnson v. … J., said: ‘A board of equalization in performing its duties, acts judicially and its orders cannot be impeached collaterally, save for want of jurisdiction or for fraud. [Black v.

Estate of Smith

767 S.W.2d 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1989

Brown, Sr., a St. Joseph attorney. Present at the meeting with Mr. Brown were Faye V. (Haer) Smith, Charles Smith, Melvin Haer and his wife, Betty Jo Haer. … In re Estate of Gangloff v.

Ex parte Lucas

160 Mo. 218 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1901

[United States v. Williams, 1 Paine’s C. C. Repts. 261; Eliot v. Cranston, 10 R. I. 88; Johnson v. Fay, 16 Gray (Mass.), 144 .] … We cite, as pertinent to the question, State v. Medical Examining Board, 32 Minn. 327 , 20 N. W. 238 ; State v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 34 Minn. 387 , 26 N. W. 123 ; Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27 , 5 Sup.

State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. McQueen

361 Mo. 1029 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1951

O’Keefe v. Brown, 361 Mo. 618 , 235 S. W. (2d) 304 ; Carr Missouri Civil Procedure, Vol. 1, Sec. 139, p. 309. … O’Keefe v. Brown, supra, and cases cited. Our provisional rule should be made absolute unless and until valid-service of process be obtained. It is so ordered. All concur.

State Ex Rel. Shields v. Purkett

878 S.W.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 21, 1994

Hawk v. Olson, 326 U.S. 271 , 279, 66 S.Ct. 116, 120 , 90 L.Ed. 61 (1945); McIntosh v. Haynes, 545 S.W.2d 647, 654 (Mo. banc 1977). This also is true in the specialized situation where the respondent is a parole board. … Smith v.

Woolfolk v. January

131 Mo. 620 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1895

Boynton v. Hatch, 47 N. Y. 225 ; Van Cott v. Van Brunt, 82 N. Y. 535 ; Carr v. LeFevre, 27 Pa. St. 413; Bank v. Alden, 129 U. S. 372 ; Du Pont v. Tilden, 42 Fed. Rep. 87. In Shickle v. … Bruner v. Brown, 48 Am. and Eng. Corp. Cases, 474.

State ex rel. Pittman v. Adams

44 Mo. 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1869

(Rex v. Amery, 2 T. R. 568 ; Rex v. Passmore, 3 T. R. 199.) … In Fuller v.

Aslin v. Stoddard County

341 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 21, 1937

(N.S.) l.c. 659), quoting approvingly from Pulaski County v. Shields, 130 Ind. 6 , 29 N.E. 385 : "It (the board) is a continuous body. While the personnel of its membership changes, the corporation continues unchanged. … A contract by a board of commissioners, the duration of which extends beyond the term of service of its then members, is not, therefore, invalid for that reason." In said case of Manley v.

Shaw v. Chicago Alton Railroad Co.

314 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1926

In Beemer v. Kerr, 23 U. C. Q. B. l. c. 559, Draper, C. … Further in the case of State v.

Mooney v. County of St. Louis

286 S.W.2d 763 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1956

They cite as authority Bennett v. Cutler, Mo.Sup., 245 S.W.2d 900 , City of St. Louis v. Butler Co., 358 Mo. 1221 , 219 S.W.2d 372 , and Red School Dist. No. 1 v. West Alton School Dist. No. 2, Mo.Sup., 159 S.W.2d 676 . … McGrath v. Walker, 97 Mo. 162 , 10 S.W. 473 ; State ex rel. Harvey v. Sheehan, 269 Mo. 421 , 190 S.W. 864 ; Denneny v. Silvey, 302 Mo. 665 , 259 S.W. 422 ; Little River Drainage Dist. v.

Nichols v. Reorganized School District No. 1 of Laclede County

364 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

City of Bucklin, 349 Mo. 789 , 163 S.W.2d 561, 562 [1]; Butler v. Board of Education of Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Audrain County, Mo., 16 S.W.2d 44 [1]. … The parties stipulated that valid and timely notice of the special election was given as provided by law and that the special election was called by the board of directors of the School District at a proper and regular board

Santa Fe Hills Golf & Country Club v. Safehi Realty Co.

349 S.W.2d 27 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1961

Palmer v. … Warner v.