Case law

State Ex Rel. Muns v. Hackmann

283 Mo. 469 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1920

[Roach v. The Board, 77 Mo. 484 ; Carling v. Jersey City, 71 N. J. L. l. c. 158; American Asylum v. Phoenix Bank, 4 Conn. 172 ; Board of Education v. Hyatt, 152 Calif. l. c. 519.] … All these schools are under,the authority and control of the district board. The whole form a system which constitutes the common or public school or schools of the district. In Board of Education v.

State ex rel. Gottlieb v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

165 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1901

S. 143 ; Balfour v. City of Portland, 28 Fed. 738 ; *516 Trustees of Cincinnati So. Railroad v. Guenther, 19 Fed. 395 ; Railroad v. Board, etc., 67 Fed. 411 ; Railroad v. Board, 54 Kansas, 781; Stanley v. … Board, 67 Fed. 411 .

State Ex Rel. Moseley v. Lee

319 Mo. 976 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1928

[State ex inf. v. Southern, 265 Mo. 275 , 286; State ex rel. v. County Court, 128 Mo. 427 , 443; Elting v. Hickman, 172 Mo. 237 , 257; State ex rel. v. Wofford, 121 Mo. 61 , 69; State ex rel. v. … [Henderson v. Koenig, 168 Mo. 356 , 374; State ex rel. v. Herrmann, 75 Mo. 340 , 351.] The case of Henderson v.

State v. Achter

448 S.W.2d 898 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 1970

Beck Brown was also killed and defendant was charged and found guilty of manslaughter by reason of his death. On appeal the judgment in that case was reversed because of an erroneous instruction. State v. … In State v.

Stark v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.

160 Mo. 529 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1901

Kelleher v. The Board of President and Directors St. Louis Public Schools, et al.; in this, that evidence was permitted in regard to the subject-matter of State ex rel. Rutledge v. … Schools v. Risley’s Heirs, 40 Mo. loc. cit. 369; Bauer v. Franklin Co., 51 Mo. locv. cit. 206; Liggett v. Morgan, 98 Mo. 39 ; State v. Adams, 108 Mo. 208 ; People’s Bank v. Scalzo, 127 Mo. 164 ; State v.

State Ex Rel. City of Republic v. Smith

345 Mo. 1158 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1940

Johnston v. Donworth, 127 Mo. App. 377 , 105 S. … See also, Fly v. Jackson, 226 Mo. App. 203 , 45 S. W. (2d) 919 , and Eaker v. Common School Dist. (Mo. App.), 62 S. W. (2d) 778 .]

Kopp v. Blessing

121 Mo. 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1894

Frank Kopp in the meantime bad become tbe owner of tbe Dodd, Brown & Company note and security, and brought suit to foreclose both mortgages, and obtained a judgment of foreclosure, September 28, 1884. … Greer v. Major (1893), 114 Mo. 145 . Upon the record before us, we are of opinion that there was error in giving defendant’s instruction, above quoted, and that it was prejudicial to plaintiff’s rights upon the merits.

State Ex Rel. Buckner v. McElroy

309 Mo. 595 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 18, 1925

In Russell v. Crook County Court, 75 Ore. l. c. 169, “County Business” from a constitutional sense has been well defined. The syllabus reads: “7. … The California Court in Fragley v. Phelan, 126 Cal. l. c. 388, borrows the New York definition of “County Affairs,” thus: “In defining the phrase ‘county affairs’ the court said in Hankins v. Mayor, 64 N.

State Ex Rel. Schneider v. Bourke

338 Mo. 86 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1935

W. 928 ; State ex rel. v. Adcock, 206 Mo. 550 , 105 S. W. 270 ; State ex rel. Hultz v. Bowman (Mo. App.), 294 S. W. 107 ; State ex rel. Spriggs v. Robinson, 253 Mo. 271 , 161 S. W. 1169 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. … Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S.

State ex rel. Haughey v. Ryan

180 Mo. 32 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 24, 1904

The rule is most aptly stated in Haldeman v. Davis, 28 West Va. l. c. 327. … Justice Miller in United States v.

State Ex Rel. Eagleton v. Hughes

355 Mo. 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1946

Kilker v. Huffman, and others, constituting the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis, reported in 187 S. W. (2d) 850 . … That power is vested exclusively in the board of trustees. State ex rel. Lambert v. Flynn, [ 348 Mo. 525 ], 154 S. W. 2d 52 , loc. cit. 54.” State ex rel. Cook v. Glassco et al., Mo. App., 161 S. W. 2d 438, 440 .

State ex rel. James Dean Hodges, Relator v. The Honorable Jodie Asel and George Lombardi

460 S.W.3d 926 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 2015

The Missouri Board of Probation and Parole informed the circuit court that Mr. Hodges successfully completed the program. The board advised the court that Mr. … V, § 4.1. “A writ of mandamus may issue upon proof of a “clear, unequivocal specific right to a thing claimed.” U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 (Mo. banc 2013).

Rennie v. Belleview School District

521 S.W.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

In Antin v. … Robertson v. Sichel, 127 U.S. 507, 515 , 8 S.Ct. 1286, 1290 , 32 L. Ed. 203 (1888).

Laclede Land & Improvement Co. v. State Tax Commission

295 Mo. 298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 28, 1922

the State Board of Equalization. … The question is practically decided (although it was approached from a converse angle) in the case of State ex rel. v. Jaudon, 286 Mo. 181 .

State v. Heard

460 S.W.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1970

.; State v. Thompson (Mo.Sup.) 425 S.W.2d 80, 85 ; State v. Meiers (Mo.Sup.) 412 S.W.2d 478, 481 . … Brown (Mo.Sup. banc) 443 S.W.2d 805 , the jury is allowed “to abdicate this responsibility to the Court”. Even before the Brown case, the possibility existed that the jury might decide guilt but not assess punishment.

State ex rel. Heaven v. Ziegenhein

144 Mo. 283 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1898

Leete v. Bank, 115 Mo. 184 -195, and cases cited. The act, however, is in all essential features simply a “pension law,” and is properly so-called. … In Mead v. Inhabitants, 1 N. E.

Thornburg v. School District No. 3

175 Mo. 12 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

In Carpenter v. … In Hedges v. Dixon County, 150 U. S. 182 , the court, per Mr.

Ex Parte Lockhart

350 Mo. 1220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 1943

Louis v. Weitzel, 130 Mo. 600 , 31 S. W. 1045 . Nor does the ordinance in question delegate unregulated discretion to the Board of Public Service. … Crandall v. McIntosh, 205 Mo. 589 , 103 S. W. 1078 ; Ballentine v. Nester, supra. Petitioner next contends that the “certificate of convenience and necessity” granted by the Board of Public Service is a franchise.

State v. Kraus

530 S.W.2d 684 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1975

Brown v. Board of Education, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S.W. 85, 87 (banc 1922). We are dealing with a narrow class of offenders, those under 21 at the time of the offense and subsequently placed on probation. … State v. Patton, 308 S.W.2d 641, 644 (Mo. banc 1958).

State Ex Rel. Wulfing v. Mooney

362 Mo. 1128 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 26, 1952

Hollman v. McElhinney et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 315 Mo. 731 , 286 S.W. 951 , the board of election commissioners in St. … Bates v. Remmers et al., Board of Election Commissioners, 325 Mo. 1175 , 30 S.W. 2d 609 , the board was attempting to print the name of Sylvester A.