Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,308 results
0.65s
People of Michigan v. Tjuan Aquis McCloud
Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2017
Gupta was not qualified to render that opinion because he lacked expertise relating to firearms. … In any event, when a witness is properly qualified as an expert, as Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHeather Hedstrom v. Compass Properties LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2017
was qualified for the position; and (4) others, similarly situated and outside the protected class, were unaffected by the employer’s adverse conduct. … When taken in context, the response is clearly an attempt to help plaintiff “save face” with her client base rather than evidence of defendants’ discriminatory intent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWayne Watkins v. Saginaw's Famous Fried Chicken LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals · May 10, 2018
A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(8) may be granted only where the claims alleged are so clearly unenforceable as a matter of law that no factual development could possibly justify recovery.” Id. … These statements clearly indicate plaintiff’s opposition to an unlawful activity.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Louis Edward Laws
Michigan Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019
Detective Daniel Main, who was qualified as an expert in drug trafficking, testified that the recovered evidence was consistent with drug trafficking and inconsistent with personal use. … A finding is clearly erroneous if this Court is left with a definite and firm conviction that the trial court has made a mistake.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Tommy Edward Richards
Michigan Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2021
Caldwell was qualified as an expert regarding psychology and adolescent brain development. … The trial court clearly did not ignore the evidence of abuse and dysfunction in defendant’s mother’s home.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Tommy Edward Richards
Michigan Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2021
Caldwell was qualified as an expert regarding psychology and adolescent brain development. … The trial court clearly did not ignore the evidence of abuse and dysfunction in defendant’s mother’s home.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRiversbend Rehabilitation Inc v. Jeffrey Enos
Michigan Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2018
This Court held that: [T]he trial court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. … While plaintiff is correct in noting these circumstances, it is incorrect in assuming that these events qualify as new facts for purposes of res judicata.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRiversbend Rehabilitation Inc v. Jeffrey Enos
Michigan Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 2018
This Court held that: [T]he trial court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. … While plaintiff is correct in noting these circumstances, it is incorrect in assuming that these events qualify as new facts for purposes of res judicata.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Tjuan Aquis McCloud
Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2017
Gupta was not qualified to render that opinion because he lacked expertise relating to firearms. … In any event, when a witness is properly qualified as an expert, as Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Timothy Leon Terry
Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2018
However, this statement did not clearly indicate that she saw mistaken the sound of a bottle breaking for a gunshot. … It is unclear from the record whether the ATF records would qualify under these exceptions.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Jessica Lee Gostlin
Michigan Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2014
Arbonne income, which the specialist never verified or confirmed, and then added the alleged unreported income from Superior Counseling, as derived through her investigation, resulting in a finding that defendant was not qualified … from Arbonne, but defendant never reported this information. 4 The application form was structured with a self-employment section, where gross monthly income could be reported, and an earned income section, which was clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHeather Hedstrom v. Compass Properties LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2017
was qualified for the position; and (4) others, similarly situated and outside the protected class, were unaffected by the employer’s adverse conduct. … When taken in context, the response is clearly an attempt to help plaintiff “save face” with her client base rather than evidence of defendants’ discriminatory intent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMichigan Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2018
The record established that MS sustained several severe physical injuries over the course of several months while in respondent-mother’s care. … Yet, respondent has not established what expert could have been called or what testimony could have been provided.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMichigan Court of Appeals · May 26, 2022
Lorrie and Sandy thus qualify as interested persons who could petition for the removal of Kapusta as personal representative of the estates. … Nor did the probate court clearly err in finding that Kapusta had mismanaged the estates.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Luster Pernell Burns Jr
Michigan Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2021
The court’s finding in that regard is not clearly erroneous. The prosecutor asserted that she did not intend to elicit improper testimony. … “It is a well-established rule that a jury may convict on the uncorroborated evidence of a CSC victim.” People v Lemmon, 456 Mich 625, 642-643 n 22; 576 NW2d 129 (1998); MCL 750.520h.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Timothy Leon Terry
Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2018
However, this statement did not clearly indicate that she saw mistaken the sound of a bottle breaking for a gunshot. … It is unclear from the record whether the ATF records would qualify under these exceptions.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJaney Grier v. State Tax Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals · May 23, 2024
Grier v State Tax Commission, unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered July 24, 2023, (Docket No. 365849). 8 “Unless clearly erroneous, the Courts are to give great weight to the interpretation of a statute placed … The mere fact that the property was wooded does not establish that the subject property was not used for agricultural operations.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople of Michigan v. Tre Devon Johnson
Michigan Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2015
Cheryl Loewe, the Oakland County Deputy Medical Examiner, performed the autopsy on September 20, and was qualified at trial as an expert in forensic pathology. … “The trial court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous if, after review of the record, this Court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAbram Andrews v. County of Wayne
Michigan Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 2018
Plaintiffs’ count six for alleged breach of repayment agreements does not qualify; such an action does not fall under the category of a claim that the taxpayer did not receive proper notice under the GPTA. … See -5- Workers’ Compensation Agency Director v MacDonald’s Indus Products, Inc, 305 Mich App 460, 474; 853 NW2d 467 (2014) (“It is well established in Michigan that, assuming
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Briana C Hendrix v. Keith E Singleton
Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2025
The doctrine of res judicata is clearly inapplicable here because the trial court orders at issue were entered during the same proceeding. … Plaintiff children also did not address whether hair care qualified as a tangible thing of economic value.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna