Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

1.74s

  • City of Hallowell v. Greater Augusta Util. Dist.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 18, 2013

    and Brown and Caldwell, engineering companies, to assist with the 2006 rate study. (Pls.' Ex. 19.) … Green v. Comm'r. of Dep't. of Mental Health, 2001 ME 86, <JI 9, 776 A.2d 612; see Guilford Transp. Indus. v. Pub. Util.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leadbetter v. Family Fun Management, Inc.

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 6, 2018

    See Lloyd v. Sugarloaf Mt. Corp., 2003 ME 117, ~ 10,833 A.2d 1; Hardy v. St. Clair, 1999 ME 142, ~ 3,739 A.2d 368 (overruled on other grounds by Brown v. Equip. Corp ., 2008 ME 186,960 A.2d 1188). … See Barnes v. New Hampshire Karting Ass'n, 128 N.H. 102, 509 A.2d 151 (kart racing); Schutkowski v. Carey, 725 P.2d 1057, 1060 (Wyo. 1986) (skydiving); Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ramsey v. York Hosp.

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 9, 2012

    Brown, under the "continuing negligent treatment" doctrine. According to the "continuing negligent treatment doctrine" as laid out in Baker v. … Baker v. Farrand, 2011 :ME 91, 26 A.3d 806, 816.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lewis v. Good Will Home Ass'n

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 4, 2007

    , Callain to the Board of Social Work and Licensure. … Higgins v. The TJX Co., Inc. and the Concord Group, Inc., d/b/a/ A.J. Wright, 331 F. Supp. 2d 3,7 (D.Me. 2004) citing Li v. CN. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606, 607-08 (Me. 1994); see also Cole v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Golden v. Lodge

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 5, 2009

    GOLDEN, Plaintiff v. … Defendant Brown's motion in limine to exclude evidence is dismissed as moot.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Morison v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 13, 2014

    Fitzgerald v. Hutchins, 2009 ME 115, fJI 9, 983 A.2d 382. … Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, fJI 10, 956 A.2d 104. To overcome a motion for summary judgment, "the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case for each element of her cause of action." Watt v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Inh. of the Town of W. Bath v. Reg'l Sch. Unit 1

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2014

    See Hodgdon v. … Likewise, the decision in Berry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Lewiston v. Androscoggin County

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 21, 2016

    V § 5.5.3 (Aug. 14, 2013). … If the Commissioners are being sued in their official capacity, "[s]uits against employees in their official capacities are essentially suits against the government entities for which they work . ... " Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Littlefield v. Walsh

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 4, 2005

    Brown v. … Fichter v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 604 A.2d 433, 437 (Me. 1992) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Plummer Plummer v. Town of Edgecomb

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2000

    PLUMMER, BOARD LLC RABREG Hi Plaintiff, . LAW Lota v. ORDER _ OCT 30 28 1! TOWN OF EDGECOMB, | 3 Defendant. … In Earwood v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Allen v. McCann

    Superior Court of Maine · May 23, 2014

    Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, '1[ 10, 956 A.2d 104. To avoid a summary judgment, "[t]he plaintiff must establish a prima facie case for each element of his cause of action." Steeves v. … Thus, unlike in~ the Board's decision was not premised solei y on a new work search. Similarly, in Dallaire v. Intelligent Control, Inc. and Hilligoss v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. 27 v. Maine Pub. Employees Retirement Sys.

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 19, 2009

    The burden of proof rests with the party seeking to overturn the agency's decision, and that party must prove that no competent evidence supports the Board's decision. See Bischoff v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Frustaci v. City of South Portland

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 25, 2002

    Frustaci v. City of South Portland, 2000 WL 1310671, at *5 (D.Me.); see Draus v. Town of Houlton, 1999 ME 51, @@ 6-8, 721 A.2d 1257, 1259-60; Fichter v. Board of Envtl. … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Scribner's Mill Preservation v. Maine Dep't of Envtl. Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 9, 2009

    Brown v. Dep't ofManpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880, 887-888 (Me. 1981). I. … Relying on Persson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Minerich v. Boothbay Harbor Community School District

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 31, 2024

    - v. Dep't ofHealth & Human Services, 2018 ME 10, ,r 8, 177 A.3d 1264 (quoting Scamman v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc., 2017 ME 41, ,r 14, 157 A.3d 223). … See Common Cause v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Whiting

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 13, 2015

    State v. Fredette, 411 A.2d 65, 68 (Me. 1979) (citations omitted). This burden is not met by a showing of no more than "a mere 'acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority." State v. … BROWN; STATE ADMITS EXHIBIT MTS-1; STATE RESTS. DEFENSE CALLS DR.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Weeks

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2023

    In State v. … Even after the defendant contacted Officer Brown’s chest, the officers remained calm. See Glenn, 2021 ME 7, § 22, 244 A.38d 1023; State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Stiff v. Town of Belgrade

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 22, 2023

    Although a municipal board's interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law that the court reviews de novo, (Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25,110,990 A.2d 1024; Logan v. … Similarly, Shapleigh v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bennett v. Lovell

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 25, 2014

    I have read Brown Development Corporation v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, 956 A.2d 104 which was cited by the plaintiff and Rogers v. Jackson, 2002 ME 140, 804 A.2d 379. … While I find much merit inJustice Alexander's dissent in Brown, at <][20, the majority opinion suggests that the motion for summary judgment must be denied. Also see Paine v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sarah Frye Home v. Soc'y of the Sisters of Charity

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 3, 2001

    Frye Home for Aged Women) is a non-profit corporation with a principal place of business in Auburn, that operates and maintains a boarding home for the elderly. It was originally located in Lewiston. … See In re Brown, 131 B.R. 900 (Bkrtcy.D.Me. 1991). The burden of establishing a trust lies on the party alleging it. See Cazillis v. Ingraham, 110 A. 359 (Me. 1920).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.