Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

0.47s

  • McCormick v. Lachance

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2010

    Blue Star Corp. v. CKF Props. LLC, 2009 ME 101, ~ 23,980 A.2d 1270, 1276 (citing Dyer v. Dep't ofTransp., 2008 ME 106, ~ 14,951 A.2d 821,825; Stanley v. … The holding in Lyon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hathaway v. City of Portland

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 6, 2003

    Plaintiff:"4" duh 7 O ioe v. … Defendant contends that because appeal of the violation lies with Board of Appeals, pursuant to § 14-471 of the Code, that this court lacks jurisdiction due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kapothanasis v. Kapothanasis

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 1, 2022

    ; and (2) addition of directors to the Board to dilute Christo' s voting share. … In support of his request, Christo cites Doe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cyr v. Secretary of State

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2017

    Mancini v. Secretary of State, 540 A.2d 117, 118 (Me. 1988); Robinson v. Board ofTrnstees of Maine State Retirement Sys., 523 A.2d 1376, 1378 (Me. 1987); 5 M.R.S. § 11007(4)(C). … State v. Niles, 585 A.2d 181, 182 (Me. 1990), citing Paradis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ross v. Acadian Seaplants, LTD

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 14, 2017

    Roekweed is the common name for a species of brown intertidal seaweed, known as Ascophy/111111 nodosum and is found on the rocks and ledges of the coast. JSMF 1 11. … In Anthony v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bridgepoint Capital, LLC v. Carvell

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 22, 2023

    See also Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182,, 9,788 A.2d 168 (requiring a party to show both a good excuse and a meritorious defense to set aside default under Rule SS(c)). … (quoting Saunders v. Tisher, 2006 ME 94, 18, 902 A.2d 830).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Plunk

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2016

    AND SALE; TITLE OF REAL ) ESTATE IS INVOLVED v. … Pursuant to 14 M .R.S.A. § 1602-C, the interest after judgment accrues at a rate of 6.65% per annum because the Note rate is less than 6.65%, the weekly average one-year United States Treasury bill rate as published by the Board

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bath Iron Works v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm'n

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 17, 2002

    Clarke, at 551 (citing Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me. 1982); see also Field, McKusick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice § 52.7 (Supp. 1981)). … McGhie et al. v. Town of Cutler et al., 202 [sic] ME 62, ¥ 5, 793 A.2d 504, 505. Substantial evidence is evidence that a reasonable mind would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion. Gagne et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Chartier v. Farm Family Life Ins. Co.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 24, 2014

    Fitzgerald v. Hutchins, 2009 ME 115, ~ 9, 983 A.2d 382 (citing Dyer v. Dep 't of Transp., 2008 ME 106, ~ 14, 951 A.2d 821). … Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, ~ 10,956 A.2d 104 (citing Univ. of Me. Found. v. Fleet Bank of Me., 2003 ME 20, ~ 20, 817 A.2d 871).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Emerson

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 23, 2010

    Brown, 1997 ME 90, C[ 5, 694 A.2d 453, 455 (quoting State v. Cusack, 649 A.2d 16, 18 (Me. 1994)). … State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Federal National Mortgage Association v. Onewest Bank

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 22, 2017

    See United Carolina Bank v. Beesley, 663 A.2d 574 (Me. 1995). … Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Levenson, 338 Md. 227, 657 A.2d 1170 (Md. 1995); Dodge City of Spartanburg, Inc. v. Jones, 317 S.C. 491, 454 S.E.2d 918 (S.C. Ct. App. 1995); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sachs v. Friendly's Ice Cream Corp.

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 27, 2002

    McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp., 678 A.2d 48, 53 (Me. 1996) (quotation and citation omitted). … Arbour v. Hazelton, 534 A.2d 1303, 1306 (Me. 1987) (emphasis added); Crowley v. Dubuc, 430 A.2d 549, 552 (Me. 1981); RESTATEMENT (SECOND) AGENCY § 257 (1958).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • T.D. Bank v. Leasure

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 23, 2011

    Plaintiff, v. DAVID D. LEASURE and TERI L. … Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me. 1993). The Defendant asserts that he believed that he was represented by the attorney that he had engaged to represent him in his bankruptcy proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Perkins v. Town of Searsport

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 23, 2000

    The Court relied on Russell: v. Brown, 63 Me. 203 (1873) which, like the case at bar, involved a wall. The argument in Jacques and Russell make clear that one threshold question is “abatability”. … See Harrisonville v. W.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Harrington v. Seaside Condominium Ass'n

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 7, 2014

    Levine v. RB.K. Caly Corp., 2001 ME 77, ~9, 770 A.2d 653. Seaside principally relies on the affidavits of Sean Nolan, Treasurer of the Association Board, and Nancy Tewksbury, President of the Board. … Pipeline, LLC v. Echo Easement Corridor, LLC, 604 F. 3d 44 (1st Cir. 201 0), citing Crispin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leighton v. Town of Waterboro

    Superior Court of Maine · May 4, 2005

    Leighton appealed to the Waterboro Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), which upheld the CEO's denial. … Portland v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Stewart Title of N. New England v. Pike

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2003

    Liseea 2 Plaintiff MAR £4 2005 V. … Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me. 1985). See also Heber v. Lucerne-in Maine Village Co., 2000 ME 137,97, 755 A.2d 1064, 1066.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. White

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 9, 2015

    CR-14-013 STATE OF MAINE v. ORDER DORIAN WHITE, Defendant Before the court is Defendant's omnibus motion to suppress evidence. … Agreeing that under the "fellow officer rule," Whiteley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McIntyre v. Kennebec County Comm'rs

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 27, 2001

    McINTYRE, SR., Appellant v. DECISION AND ORDER KENNEBEC COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellees In this matter, the appellant, Charles S. … Next, the proper party in an action seeking review of a local property tax abatement decision is the town itself, not the intermediary tribunal of the board of county commissioners. Town of Vienna v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Inh. of the Town of Burlington v. Eaton

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 27, 2009

    Vienna v. Kokernak, 612 A.2d 870, 874 (Me. 1992). … Yusem v. Town ofRaymond, 2001 ME 61, ~ 9, 769 A.2d 865, 870.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.