Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmed

1,681 results

1.79s

  • ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. v. Carter

    618 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, D. Maine · May 26, 2009

    .”); United States v. V. & E Eng’g & Constr. … Records, Inc. v. Brown, No. C 08-01040 WHA, 2008 WL 4911161 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95171 (N.D.Cal.2008); Sony Pictures Home Entm’t Inc. v. Lott, 471 F.Supp.2d 716 (N.D.Tex.2007); Warner Bros. Records Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Eagle Snacks, Inc. v. Our Co.

    831 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 1993

    Roeder v. Alpha Industries, Inc., 814 F.2d 22, 25 (1st Cir.1987) (quoting Conley v. Gibson 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). … MacKerron v. Madura, 445 A.2d 680, 682 (Me.1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Plummer v. Webb

    19 F. Cas. 894 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1825

    The ease of Crosby v. … “Baron and Feme,” V; Russel v. Corne, 1 Salk. 119, 2 Ld. Raym. 1031; 1 Chit. Pl. 61.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Waidman

    42 F.2d 239 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 11, 1930

    Carter v. Roberts, 177 U. S. 496 , 20 S. Ct. 713 , 44 L. Ed. 861 . In Swaim v. U. S., 165 U. S. 553 , 17 S. Ct. 448, 451 , 41 L. … Dynes v. Hoover, 20 How. 65 , 15 L. Ed. 838 ; Ex parte Reed, 100 U. S. 13 , 25 L. Ed. 538 ; Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. 167 , 6 S. Ct. 570 , 29 L. Ed. 601 ; Johnson v. Sayre, 158 U. S. 109 , 15 S. Ct. 773 , 39 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • EASY PAY SOLUTIONS INC v. CROOKS

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 28, 2025

    Shoen v. … In Capital Advisors v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Levinsky's, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    999 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 31, 1998

    Board-man Dep. at 12-13; Tr. at 57. … Board-man Dep. at 13, 42.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Blease (In Re Envisionet Computer Services, Inc.)

    276 B.R. 7 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 11, 2002

    See Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. … Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed against eight defendants, each of whom Plaintiff alleges is a member of the Debtor’s board of directors.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mottram v. Murch

    330 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 5, 1971

    a petition for post-conviction habeas corpus relief under the provisions of 14 M.R.S.A. § 5502 et seq. challenging the procedures followed by the Parole Board in revoking his parole. … Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 67 , 88 S.Ct. 1549 , 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968); Desmond v. United States Board of Parole, 397 F.2d 386, 389 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 919 , 89 S.Ct. 249 , 21 L.Ed.2d 206 (1968).

    Reversed on other grounds by Robert H. Mottram v. Frank F. Murch, 458 F.2d 626 (1972)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Anne Yered, MD v. Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems and Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center

    District Court, D. Maine · Feb 23, 2026

    Yered) held board certifications 1 These facts are drawn from the Complaint, ECF No. 1-1. See Plourde v. Lewis, No. 1:23-CV-00323, 2025 WL 2723554, at *5 (D. Me. Sept. 24, 2025). … Green v. Cosby, 160 F. Supp. 3d 431, 433 (D. Mass. 2016) (citing Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas Hosp., 199 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1999)). The Court reviews pure questions of law de novo, see PowerShare, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Neely v. Bar Harbor Bankshares

    270 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 10, 2003

    In addition, McFee was the Vice Chair of BTI’s Board of Directors and the Chairperson of all of BTI’s committees responsible for strategic planning. … Letellier v. Small, 400 A.2d 371, 376 (Me.1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waldoboro Bank v. American Casualty Co.

    775 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 11, 1991

    See also Harris v. Resolution Trust Corp., 939 F.2d 926, 929 (11th Cir.1991). … See also § 545.121(f); Atlantic Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Spickler v. Lee

    208 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 1, 2002

    Id.; Collins v. Nuzzo, 244 F.3d 246, 250 (1st Cir.2001) (quoting Chongris v . Board of Appeals, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir.1987)). … In Jackson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dinkel v. General Motors Corp.

    400 F. Supp. 2d 289 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 9, 2005

    See also Berry v. Am. … I recognize that my conclusion differs from that of Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • GLADU v. MAGNUSSON

    District Court, D. Maine · Jan 23, 2023

    ECF No. 33 at 4-5 (citing De La Garza v. De La Garza, 91 Fed. App’x 508, 509 (7th Cir. 2004)). … See Brown v. Ferrara, No. 2:10-CV-523-GZS, 2012 WL 1165880, at *1 (D. Me.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ezekiel v. Astrue

    853 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2012

    In Rodriquez v. … He refers to a letter he filed with the Decision Review Board on May 4, 2009.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Automatic Dialing Corp. v. Maritime Quality Hardware Co.

    98 F. Supp. 650 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 2, 1951

    Mechlin, acting under the instructions and with the approval of the Board of Directors. During the year 1947, which includes all times relevant to the present case, Mr. … Portland Motor Sales Co., Inc. v. Millett, 1925, 124 Me. 329 , 128 A. 694 ; Mitchell v. Canadian Realty Co., 1922, 121 Me. 512 , 118 A. 373 . Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daggett v. Devine

    973 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 18, 1997

    I am aware that in Thorsted v. … In this respect, the case is unlike Buckley v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wainwright v. County of Oxford

    369 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 21, 2005

    De-Jesus-Adorno v. Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat'l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … FDIC v. Anchor Props., 13 F.3d 27, 30 (1st Cir.1994) (citing Darr v. Muratore, 8 F.3d 854, 859 (1st Cir.1993)). III.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pew v. Scopino

    904 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 15, 1995

    He could discern three people on board: the pilot, a passenger in front, and a man in the open side doorway looking down at him. … V.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Capozza Tile Co., Inc. v. Joy

    223 F. Supp. 2d 307 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2002

    Fund v. … The party claiming preemption under Garmon “is required to demonstrate that his case is one that the Board could legally decide in his favor.” International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.