Case law

Learnard v. Inhabitants of Town of Van Buren

164 F. Supp. 2d 35 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 24, 2001

See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 568-69 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Defendants’ arguments rely on the so-called “Parratt-Hudson doctrine,” e.g., Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Prods., 68 F.3d 525, 535 (1st Cir.1995), which is based on two Supreme Court rulings, Hudson v.

THIBEAULT

District Court, D. Maine · Jun 24, 2026

NuVasive, Inc. v. Day, 954 F.3d 439, 443 (1st Cir. 2020) (quoting Nieves-Márquez v. P.R., 353 F.3d 108, 120 (1st Cir. 2003)). “The First two factors are the most important.” Together Emps. v. Mass Gen. … We the People PAC v. Bellows, 512 F. Supp. 3d 74, 77 (D. Me. 2021). V.

Lynch v. Christie

815 F. Supp. 2d 341 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 7, 2011

This is not like Maietta Const., Inc. v. … See Robinson v.

Textile Workers Union v. Bates Manufacturing Co.

158 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 29, 1958

In defense to the principal action defendant interposed the decision of a majority of an Arbitration Board appointed by the parties pursuant to the arbitration provisions of the collective bargaining agreements. … Cadillac Publishing Co., Inc., v. Summerfield, 1955, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 14 , 227 F.2d 29, 30 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 901 , 76 S.Ct. 179 , 100 L.Ed. 791 ; Atlantic Meat Co., Inc., v.

Waldron v. George Weston Bakeries, Inc.

575 F. Supp. 2d 271 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 10, 2008

That is, there will be information provided to the appropriate taxing authorities, workers compensation board, etc. … Ty, Inc. v.

Monmouth Canning Co. v. Local Union 340, Truckdrivers, Warehousemen and Helpers Union

140 F. Supp. 304 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 14, 1956

And the Pocahontas case, supra, notwithstanding, it now appears to be firmly established that the prevention of unfair labor practices is a matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board. … Direct Transit Lines, Inc., v. Starr, 6 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 699 ; American Optical Co. v. Andert, D.C.W.D.Mo.1952, 108 F.Supp. 252 ; Walker v.

Cutler v. Federal Deposit Insurance

796 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 9, 1992

The PSA, including Plaintiff’s handwritten notation, was- not approved by the board of directors of MSB or its Loan Committee. … See, e.g., Fleet Bank of Maine v. Steeves, 785 F.Supp. 209 (D.Me.1992); Fleet Bank of Maine v. Wilson, 780 F.Supp. 841, 846 (D.Me.1991); New Maine National Bank v. Benner, 774 F.Supp. 36, 40 (D.Me.1991); Bateman v.

Brougham Ex Rel. Brougham v. Town of Yarmouth

823 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, D. Maine · May 28, 1993

In the seminal case under the IDEA, Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. … Rowley v. Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education, 632 F.2d 945 (2d Cir.1980).

Fleet Bank of Maine v. Matthews

795 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 29, 1992

Griffin, 935 F.2d 691, 698 (5th Cir.1991); FDIC v. Newhart, 892 F.2d 47, 50 (8th Cir.1989); Adams v. Walker, 767 F.Supp. 1099, 1106 (D.Kan.1991); Adams v. … of Directors or its loan committee nor reflected in the minutes of said board or committee.

Fitzpatrick v. Town of Falmouth

324 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, D. Maine · May 7, 2004

See Rose v. … As stated in Weber v.

James v. Day

646 F. Supp. 239 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 27, 1986

See Booker v. Brown, 619 F.2d 57 (10th Cir.1980) (naming Chief of National Guard Bureau and Secretary of Defense); Jones v. … See Fischer v. U.S.

Thompson v. City of Portland

620 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 22, 1985

Nadeau v. State, 395 A.2d 107, 116 (Me. 1978). … Clark v. Taylor, 710 F.2d 4 (1st Cir.1983).

Jane Doe v. Osseo Area Sch. Dist.

296 F. Supp. 3d 1090 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 31, 2017

In Doe v. … Miller v. S. Callaway R-II Sch.

Black v. Sullivan

561 F. Supp. 1050 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 13, 1983

Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 , 91 S.Ct. 780 , 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971) [access to divorce court]; Turner v. Fouche, 396 U.S. 346 , 90 S.Ct. 532 , 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970) [school board membership]; Cipriano v. … Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 , 92 S.Ct. 1208 , 31 L.Ed.2d 551 , a regulation, Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 , or a constitutional provision, Carrington v.

Theriault v. Magnusson

698 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 1988

As stated in Nachtigall v. … Nachtigall v. Board of Charities and Corrections, 590 F.Supp. at 1224 , citing Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 , 94 S.Ct. 2800 , 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (1974).

Ashmore v. Northeast Petroleum Division of Cargill, Inc.

925 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, D. Maine · May 16, 1996

Cooper, et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3847, at 368 (2d ed. 1986) (quoting Brown v. Woodring, 174 F.Supp. 640, 644 (D.C.Pa.1959)). See also Stewart Organization, Inc. v. … See e.g., Williams v. Kerr Glass Mfg.

United States v. Shinderman

432 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 16, 2006

United States v. LaRouche Campaign, 841 F.2d 1176, 1179 (1st Cir.1988) (quoting United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 , 94 S.Ct. 3090 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974)). … They cite United States v. Fields, 663 F.2d 880 , 881 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Cuthbertson, 651 F.2d 189 , 195 (3d Cir.1981); and United States v. Cherry, 876 F.Supp. 547, 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).

Graffam v. Town of Harpswell

250 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 26, 2003

Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … A federal court, after all, “should not ... sit as a zoning board of appeals.” Id. at 833 (quotation marks in original; quoting Village of Belle Terre v.

Blanchette v. United States

102 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 24, 1952

On October 25, 1943, the Army Retiring Board found the insured was incapacitated for further military duty due to his physical condition and recommended his release from active service. … As was recently said by the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in its opinion in the case of Hendricks v.

Ricci v. Applebee's Northeast, Inc.

297 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2003

Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 710 (2nd Cir.1998); Breland-Starling v. Disney Publishing Worldwide, 166 F.Supp.2d 826, 830 (D.C.N.Y.2001). Although Ms. … Ricci’s allegation is similar to the case of Mauro v. S. New Eng. Telcomms., Inc., 208 F.3d 384 (2nd Cir.2000), a case decided after Brown v. Coach Stores.