Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmed

1,681 results

0.86s

  • FEDEQ DV004 LLC v. CITY OF PORTLAND

    District Court, D. Maine · Apr 11, 2022

    See Lambert v. … Board of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). After showing a recognized property interest, “the plaintiff must next show that the challenged action caused an illegal taking of that interest.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Andrews

    381 F. Supp. 3d 1044 · District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 2019

    Brown , 634 F.3d 435 , 438 (8th Cir. 2011) ), the officers had probable cause to believe that a gun was in the car before they conducted a search. … Schawitsch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New England Surfaces v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

    517 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 14, 2007

    Edgemoor Iron Co. v. Brown Hoisting Mach. Co., 62 A. 1054, 1055-56 (Del.1906). 33 . Allied Equipment Company v. Weber Engineered Products, Inc. is also instructive. 237 F.2d 879 (4th Cir.1956). … In Cohen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • LEWIS v. SPURWINK SERVICES INC

    District Court, D. Maine · Dec 6, 2022

    Forestier Fradera v. … Barber v. Colo.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. the Ship Fernview

    455 F. Supp. 1043 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 10, 1978

    Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness Bridge, supra (wharfinger under no duty to warn ship of night fog); United States Trucking Corp. v. … The recorder for plant # 2 was located on an instrumentation board about 100 feet from the absorber. 24 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Silkman

    233 F. Supp. 3d 201 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 26, 2017

    v. … See United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • FOX v. MAKIN

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 10, 2025

    (citing Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 402 F. Supp. 2d 303, 308 (D. Me. 2005) (in turn quoting FED. R. EVID. 702 advisory committee note)). … Concepts, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BOULIER v. BLAUVELT

    District Court, D. Maine · Jun 10, 2025

    However, the First Circuit has directed district courts reviewing pro se pleadings to construe these submissions liberally, see Sanchez v. Brown Univ., No. 23-1983, 2024 U.S. App. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MCKENZIE v. BRANNAN

    District Court, D. Maine · Feb 1, 2023

    Okmyansky v. … Ex. 56, at 1–2; see Drinkwater v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • SIERRA CLUB v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

    District Court, D. Maine · Sep 26, 2023

    In Cousins v. … Board of Governors, 516 F.2d 1229, 1242 (D.C. Cir. 1975), or where the agency improperly supplemented the record with “post hoc rationalizations” supporting its actions, Walter O. Boswell Mem’l Hosp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION INC v. BELLOWS

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 28, 2023

    (citation omitted)); Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994) (“[T]here is a presumption that a given term is used to mean the same thing throughout a statute.”); Est. of Joyce v. Com. … Fish v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ROSS v. NEW RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LLC

    District Court, D. Maine · May 14, 2024

    See Dantzler, Inc. v. … TransUnion, 594 U.S. at 427 (quoting Spokeo, 578 U.S. at 345 (Thomas, J., concurring)); see also Browne v. Nat’l Collegiate Student Loan Tr., No. 21-CV-11871- KM-JSA, 2021 WL 6062306, at *1 (D.N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CTC Communications Corp. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.

    77 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 12, 1999

    Corp. v. … Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 310 U.S. 469, 501 , 60 S.Ct. 982 , 84 L.Ed. 1311 (1940). Because the antitrust laws were designed to protect competition, not competitors, Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • IMS Health Corp. v. Rowe

    532 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 2, 2008

    This data will have to be continually updated to make certain it captures new information that the PDIIs will receive from the Maine licensing boards. Mr. … In Whalen v.

    Reversed by IMS Health Inc. v. Mills, 616 F.3d 7 (2010)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • ROBERTSON v. BARBER FOODS LLC

    District Court, D. Maine · Jun 11, 2020

    Martínez-Rivera v. Puerto Rico, 812 F.3d 69, 77–78 (1st Cir. 2016) (internal quotations omitted); see also Black v. Brown Univ., 555 F. Supp. 880, 88485 (D.R.I. 1983) (Selya, J.) … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FURNITURE MATTRESSES & MORE LLC v. TEXAS RUSTIC INC

    District Court, D. Maine · Sep 25, 2019

    PREP Tours, 913 F.3d at 17 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tire Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)) (internal alterations and quotations omitted). … McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Ruzicka

    333 F. Supp. 3d 853 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 7, 2018

    V. … See United States v. Brown , 921 F.2d 785 , 793 (8 th Cir. 1990). B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LODER v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 3, 2021

    See Rodríguez-Reyes v. … On May 29, 2018, Loder was summoned to a meeting with Johnston and Ireland and was told that he needed to “get on board with the fusion center concept.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES

    District Court, D. Maine · Feb 29, 2024

    It is run by a board of directors and its executive officers, all of whom are United States citizens. CMP Compl. ¶ 18. … See also Morales v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Darling v. Western Thrift & Loan

    600 F. Supp. 2d 189 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 20, 2009

    Corp. v. … The disclosure requirements of the TILA are informed by Regulation Z, authored by the Federal Reserve Board. Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp., 485 F.3d 12,14 (1st Cir.2007).

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.