Case law

Development Specialists, Inc. v. Kaplan

574 B.R. 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 26, 2017

Tiernan v. Barresi, 944 F.Supp. 35, 37 (D. … (quoting Barber v.

Canales v. University of Phoenix, Inc.

854 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 5, 2012

Canales also questioned whether the National Labor Relations Board decision, D. R. … But see Betts v.

Warren v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

495 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 2007

(citations omitted)); Maine Human Rights Comm’n v. … Indeed, Maine’s Law Court interpreted the law in 2006, Whitney v.

United Textile Workers v. Goodall-Sanford, Inc.

129 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 1, 1955

Considering Milk and Ice Cream Drivers and Dairy Employees Union, Local No. 98 v. Gillespie Milk Products Corp., 6 Cir., 203 F.2d 650 ; Textile Workers Union v. American Thread Co., D.C. … Mass., 113 F.Supp. 137 ; Local 207, etc., v. Landers, Frary & Clark, D.C.Conn., 119 F.Supp. 877 ; Insurance Agents’ International Union v. Prudential Ins. Co., D.C.Pa., 122 F.Supp. 869 ; Evening Star Newspaper Co. v.

In re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litigation

236 F.R.D. 48 · District Court, D. Maine · May 25, 2006

Hernandez-Colon, 951 F.2d 1325, 1336 (1st Cir.1991) (emphasis added) (citing Penson v. Terminal Transport Co., 634 F.2d 989, 993 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. … V. Conclusion After consulting with counsel, the Clerk’s Office shall schedule a hearing.

Springer v. Seaman

639 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 15, 1986

Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … In United Mine Workers v.

Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of South Portland

164 F. Supp. 3d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 11, 2016

Ass’n of Realtors v. … Citing United States v.

Mitchell v. Newryder

245 F. Supp. 2d 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 5, 2003

See Bell v. … See Oliver v.

Falmouth School Committee v. B. Ex Rel. P.B.

106 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 11, 2000

Roland M. v. Concord School Comm., 910 F.2d 983, 997-98 (1st Cir.1990). Accord Dell v. … No. 283 v.

DALTON-BRIGHT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 23, 2019

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … A diagnosis alone does not establish that an impairment is severe, Brown v. Colvin, No. 13-473, 2015 WL 58396, at *2 (D. Me.

The Etna

8 F. Cas. 803 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 20, 1838

Jur. c. 35; De Manneville v. De Manneville, 10 Ves. 52; Whitfield v. Hales, 12 Ves. 492; Wellesley v. Wellesley, 2 Bligh [N. S.] 128. … The Juliana, 2 Dod. 504; Harden v. Gordon [Case No. 6,047]; The Minerva, 1 Hagg. Adm. 347; Brown v. Lull [Case No. 2,018].

The Dawn

7 F. Cas. 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 21, 1839

Reid v. Darby, 10 East, 143; Morris v. Robison, 3 Barn. & C. 196. … This-was the case of Pool v.

LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MAINE v. Dunlap

659 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 16, 2009

Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 737 n. 8, 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974) (addressing an election issue since the question was “capable of repetition, but evading review”); New Hampshire Right to Life PAC v. … See, e.g., Nader v.

ELISENS

District Court, D. Maine · May 19, 2026

See also Ferranti v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997).

GOODWILL

District Court, D. Maine · Dec 19, 2025

AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG, 780 F.3d 429, 435 (1st Cir. 2015). III. … P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v) as a sanction for her discovery noncompliance.

Donovan v. Bank of America

574 F. Supp. 2d 192 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 29, 2008

See e.g., Nelson v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., 282 F.3d 1057, 1059 (9th Cir.2002); Brown v. Maine Medical Center, No. 98-444-P-C, 1999 WL 33117137 , at *3 (D.Me. … See e.g., Nelson, 282 F.3d at 1059-60 ; Bach v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 149 Fed.Appx. 354, 358-59 (6th Cir.2005) (unpublished); Brown, 1999 WL 33117137 , at *3; Akalwadi v. Risk Mgmt.

United States v. Sutherland

891 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1995

The robber was described by the bank teller as a white male, 5'10" tall, slim build, brown hair, twenty-five to thirty years of age, and wearing gray pants, a black leather jacket, and a grey, hooded sweatshirt. … See United States v.

United States v. Cochran

646 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 20, 1985

United States v. … United States v. Brown, 551 F.2d 236 (8th Cir. 1977); Wade v. United States, 457 F.2d 335 (9th Cir.1972); Smith v. United States, supra.

Purinton v. Hull of a New Ship

20 F. Cas. 67 · District Court, D. Maine · May 23, 1855

The authority, which appears to me to apply with the most stringency, is the case of Smith v. The Eastern Railroad [Case No. 13,039], decided by the circuit court in Massachusetts. … It was carried by appeal to the circuit court, and the decision of that court is reported under the name of Read v.

Estate of Emmons v. Peet

950 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 30, 1996

In Youngberg v. … In Board of Regents v.