Case law

Town of Manchester v. Augusta Country Club

477 A.2d 1124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 23, 1984

In a letter to the Manchester Board of Selectmen dated February 24, 1981, the club informed the town that “we reluctantly are compelled to close the beach to all but club members and their invited guests commencing with the … See Smith v. Tonge, 377 A.2d 109 (Me.1977); Supruniuk v. Petriw, 334 A.2d 857 (Me.1975). Compare Maine Broadcasting Co. v.

State v. Stinson

424 A.2d 327 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 1981

In State v. … The record indicates that, without the benefit of a pre-sentence investigation and report by the State Board of Probation and Parole, pursuant to Rule 32(c)(1), M.R.

Kenneth W. Ross v. Acadian Seaplants, LTD.

2019 ME 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 2019

McGarvey v. … Moore v.

Colbath v. H. B. Stebbins Lumber Co.

127 Me. 406 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1929

Holdripp Exec. v. Otway, 2 Saunders, 106; French v. Campbell, 2 H. Black, 178; Hecht v. Taubel, 26 Atl., 20 (N. J.); B. & M. River R. R. Co. v. Boestler, 15 Ia., 555 ; Patterson v. … In Toole v.

State of Maine v. Samadi M. Hassan

82 A.3d 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 2013

United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir.1993); see also United States v. Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 21 (1st Cir.2012); United States v. Caro, 597 F.3d 608, 635 (4th Cir.2010); United States v. … Old Chief v.

McNally v. Nicholson Manufacturing Company

313 A.2d 913 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1973

(p. 275, 276, 128 A. at p. 189 ) Section 2-318 operated, product-wise, generally across the board; all “goods”, as defined by Section 2-105(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code, were affected. … The Permanent Editorial Board to the Uniform Commercial Code has continued to give the entire problem its attention.

State of Maine v. Daniel B. Tucci Sr.

2019 ME 51 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 2019

See State v. … See Brown v.

Rotch v. Livingston

91 Me. 461 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1898

Old Colony Railroad Co. v. Fall River, 147 Mass. 455 ; Hovey v. Mayo, 43 Maine, 322; Cyr v. Dufour, 68 Maine, 492; Briggs v. L. & A. Street R. R. Co., 79 Maine, 363; Burr v. Stevens, 90 Maine, 500. In Wellman v. … Appleton v. Fullerton, 1 Gray, 186 ; Brown v. Stone, 10 Gray, 61 ; Herman v. Roberts, 119 N. Y. 39 .

DeLong v. Maine Central Railroad

136 Me. 194 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 24, 1939

(Wash.), 27 P. (2d), 1082 (1933) (assistant cook to repair gang injured while carrying beef to boarding cars of work train) ; and Lynch v. Central Vermont Ry. … Co. v.

McLaughlin v. Superintending School Committee

832 A.2d 782 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 16, 2003

Stewart v. Aldrich, 2002 ME 16, ¶ 8 , 788 A.2d 603, 606 . The question of when a tort claim accrues is a legal question, see White v. … Patricia relies on our decisions in Bernier v. Raymark Industries, 516 A.2d 534 (Me.1986) 5 and Townsend v. Chute Chem.

State v. Crocker

435 A.2d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 18, 1981

If I told you that the desk was brown, would that be the truth or would that be a lie? A That would be the truth. Q Let me test you one more time to see if I can catch you. … A Brown. Q And what color is the Judge’s robe? A Black. Q I don’t have any further questions. .

Berry v. M. F. Donovan & Sons

120 Me. 457 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 10, 1921

Hine v. Trevor, supra; The Belfast, 7 Wall., 624, 19 Law Ed., 266; Taylor v. Carryl, 20 How., 583 , 15 Law Ed., 1028; Schoonmaker v. Gilmore, 102 U. S., 118 , 26 Law Ed., 95; Manchester v. Massachusetts, 139 U. … In tort the jurisdiction of the admiralty is not dependent upon the fact that the wrong or injury is inflicted by the vessel or on board the vessel; it depends upon whether the tort occurred upon the high seas or upon navigable

True v. Inhabitants of Freeman

64 Me. 573 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

unreasonable, and there were not facts enough alleged in the petition to make it appear that such refusal was unreasonable ; and because the plaintiff was one of the county commissioners at the time of the location by that board … The true construction of § 18, and the distinction between what is thereby required for town and what for private ways, is given Hall v. County Commissioners, 62 Maine, 325.

Gilman ex rel. Gilman v. Haviland

114 Me. 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 1915

Young v. Witham, 75 Maine, 536; Paul v. Frye; 80 Maine, 26; Railroad Co. v. Dubay, 109 Maine, 29. … lived in comparative seclusion from 1888 on, especially after she went to Hartford, avoiding meeting people generally; that she *309 appeared to have little means, was poorly dressed, and lived inexpensively at different boarding

Flood

139 Me. 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1942

Taylor v. Taylor, 174 Ind., 670 ; 93 N. E., 9 . “It will be presumed that the ruling of a Judge receiving or rejecting evidence was right unless the exceptions show affirmatively it was wrong.” Hill v. … Reference may be had to the following: Rich v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Hewins Travel Consultants, Inc.

622 A.2d 1163 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1993

See Advance Mortgage Corp. v. … Board of Educ., 93 Ill.App.3d 925 , 49 Ill.Dec. 460, 465 , 418 N.E.2d 104, 109 (1981), rev’d on other grounds, 92 Ill.2d 197 , 65 Ill.Dec. 281 , 441 N.E.2d 73 (1982).

State v. Inman

301 A.2d 348 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 13, 1973

In Rog v. … In Smith v.

Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.

2025 ME 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2025

v. CNC SYSTEMS, INC. … See Pelletier v.

Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.

2025 ME 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2025

v. CNC SYSTEMS, INC. … See Pelletier v.

Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Secretary of State

2020 ME 109 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 2020

V). … Square Park v.